The Department of Ecological Environment intensifies the investigation and punishment of EIA issues and severely punishes fraudulent acts in the field of EIA

Recently, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment transferred the illegal clues found in the review of the environmental impact assessment documents in the second quarter of 2020 to the ecological environment departments of 7 provinces (regions) including Zhejiang, Anhui, Shandong, Henan, Hunan, Guangxi, and Xinjiang.

The 8 typical cases are:

1.

Hangzhou Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment fined Zhejiang Wending Environmental Engineering Co.

2.

Anqing Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment fined Anhui Zhongtian Environmental Impact Assessment Consulting Service Co.

3.

Jining City Ecological Environment Bureau fined Shandong Meiyu Engineering Consulting Co.

4.

Xinyang Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment intends to impose a fine of 200,000 yuan on the compiling unit Jiangxi Sunya Environmental Protection Technology Co.

5.

Xinyang City Ecological Environment Bureau intends to fine the compiling unit Anhui San's Environmental Technology Co.

6.
Case of serious quality problems in the environmental impact assessment documents of the International Industrial Park for APIs and Preparations in Changde National Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hunan Province

After investigation, the environmental impact report form has plagiarized the "Chongqing Yaoyou•Dongting Pharmaceutical "API International Industrial Base" Standardized Plant Project Environmental Impact Report Form" behavior and serious quality problems
.
The area, address, and surrounding environment of the two projects are different, but the area, address, surrounding environment, environmental quality status and the project plan and monitoring point map in the project overview chapter of the two report forms are mainly All the environmental protection goals and relative position relationships in the chapter of environmental protection goals and the project names in the chapter of project feasibility analysis are exactly the same
.

The Changde Ecological Environment Bureau revoked the environmental assessment approval of the former Changde Economic and Technological Development Zone Environmental Protection Bureau for the project, fined Hunan Zhenxin Environmental Protection Technology Co.
, Ltd.
, the compiling unit, and 10 points for dishonesty
.
At the same time, the Changde City Economic Development Zone Working Committee and the Changde City Ecological Environment Bureau Party Group organized and dealt with the responsible persons responsible for the project and the environmental assessment approval in accordance with the cadre and personnel management authority
.

7.
Case of serious quality problems in environmental impact assessment documents for the expansion project of Minhong Wood Co.
, Ltd.
in Guigang City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

After investigation, the environmental impact report form had plagiarized the "Environmental Impact Report Form for the Expansion Project of Guangxi Guigang Wanfeng Wood Industry Co.
, Ltd.
" and serious quality problems
.
The two projects are actually 9,800 meters from the Yujiang River in the southwest and 7,000 meters from the Yujiang River in the northwest.
The two environmental impact assessment documents describe the main environmental protection objectives of the project evaluation area as "The surface water environment of the Yujiang River is north relative to the plant site, and the relative plant site distance is 3930 meters”; in the engineering analysis of the two report forms, there was a misrepresentation of “the newly added plywood production capacity of some expansion projects was 20,000 cubic meters per year”, and the actual new production capacity was 30,000 cubic meters of plywood and 10,000 cubic meters of plywood each year.

.

The Guigang Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment fined Jiangxi Yuecheng Environmental Technology Service Co.
, Ltd.
, the compiling unit of the environmental impact assessment, of 40,000 yuan, 10 points for the compiling unit for dishonesty, and 20 points for the compiling unit Guo Huimin, which was included in the blacklist of dishonesty and prohibited from engaging in environmental impact within five years.
Report (table) preparation work
.

8.
A case of serious quality problems in environmental impact assessment documents for the road reconstruction project between Shawan County and Hongtuzhuangzi Village in Tacheng District, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

After investigation, the environmental impact report form had plagiarized the "Environmental Impact Report Form of Shaliu Highway Road Project in Shawan County" and serious quality problems
.
The construction sites of the two projects are different, but the descriptions of the starting and ending points of the project (section on environmental quality) and the distance between the project starting point and the same material yard (section on engineering earthwork) in the two report forms are exactly the same; the location of the monitoring point for the current atmospheric environmental quality It is different from the monitoring date, but the daily average concentration monitoring values ​​of PM10 and NO2 in the attached monitoring report are exactly the same; the location of the current acoustic environment monitoring points are different, but the noise monitoring values ​​of the first three monitoring points are exactly the same day and night; the traffic volume forecasts are different , The design speed is different, but the traffic noise prediction results during the operation period of the two are exactly the same
.

The Ecology and Environment Bureau of Tacheng Prefecture fined Xinjiang Lvjiayuan Environmental Technology Co.
, Ltd.
, the compiling unit of the environmental assessment, 233,600 yuan, and scored 10 points for dishonesty
.
The main compiling staff Li Shihai and Cai Bo were scored 20 points for dishonesty, and they were included in the blacklist of dishonesty
.
The preparation of environmental impact reports (tables) is prohibited for five years .
In response to Xinjiang Lvjiayuan Environmental Protection Technology Co.
, Ltd.
suspected of falsifying monitoring data, the Tacheng District Ecological Environment Bureau transferred the case to the local public security agency
.
At the same time, the former deputy director and staff of the Shawan County Eco-Environmental Bureau were notified and criticized, and an in-depth inspection was ordered
.

In the next step, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment will further strengthen the review of environmental impact assessment documents, regularly transfer relevant illegal clues to local ecological environment departments, urge local ecological environment departments to strictly investigate serious quality problems in environmental assessment documents, crack down on fraud in the field of environmental assessment, and earnestly maintain environmental assessment technical services Market order
.