The 20th National Congress once again set the dual carbon goal, reassuring the dual carbon industry

Recently, due to the Russian-Ukrainian war, some EU countries have restarted coal power, and many marketing accounts have taken this to lead the rhythm and say "the EU has abandoned carbon neutrality!" Many people doubt
whether China's dual carbon goals will continue to be implemented.

In the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China just released, China's dual carbon goal was once again emphasized, indicating that it would actively and steadily promote carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, and made specific arrangements
in terms of dual control of carbon emissions, energy revolution, improving the carbon market, and improving carbon sink capacity.
This undoubtedly dispels
those doubts about China's dual carbon goals.
I will use the report of the 20th National Congress to analyze the necessity and inevitability of achieving carbon neutrality in the world, so that everyone should not be led by the rhythm
so easily.

1.
Carbon neutrality is in China's interest

The main goal of carbon neutrality is to end the fossil energy civilization of mankind for more than 200 years and evolve into a renewable energy civilization
.
Its most important manifestation is the conversion of energy use based on coal, oil and natural gas to energy use
dominated by renewable electricity.
The biggest difference is that the source of energy has changed from natural resources to industrial resources
.

As far as natural resources are concerned, although China has a lot of coal, it lacks oil and gas
.
And industrial resources, that is, the existence of self-sacrifice.

With the most important technologies and industries in renewable electricity, such as photovoltaic, wind power, electric vehicles, power grids and other related technologies, China is unique in
the world in terms of technical level and industrial capacity.
The relevant production capacity basically accounts for more than half of the world, which is equivalent to half of the world's kerosene gas in China
.

You know, China's annual trade surplus is about 500 billion US dollars, just buying oil will cost half of the money, in the era of carbon neutrality, not only do not have to spend this money, but also by exporting clean energy to make money exponentially.

Carbon neutrality is the only way out for EU energy

The main reason for the recent negative public opinion on carbon neutrality is the restart of coal power in the European Union, because the Russian-Ukrainian war has led to a significant reduction
in the supply of Russian oil and gas to Europe.
Then some people ridiculed that the EU would not engage in carbon neutrality, and lifted a stone to drop it on its own feet
.
In fact, anyone who pays attention to the EU's carbon neutrality policy knows that the EU's carbon neutrality goal has never changed, but there is really no energy available in the short term, only what is used, even firewood
.

Even if we don't pay attention to the carbon neutrality policy, think about it with the back of our head, the EU is so miserable this time because the energy is stuck by others, and coal is not rich in Europe, to switch to coal must not be stuck by others? Therefore, to get rid of this dilemma and avoid repeating this mistake, the only way
is to take renewable energy.

In fact, because of the Russian-Ukrainian war, Europe has accelerated the process of
renewable energy construction.
But because this news cannot detonate the emotions of the melon-eating masses, the marketing number does not like to write
.
The result is that "the EU abandons carbon neutrality" is overwhelming, and "the EU accelerates new energy construction" is rarely seen
.

Third, what kind of logic is it that if others do not engage in it, we will not engage in it

This is a soul torture, I want to ask those who doubt life when they hear that the EU does not engage in carbon neutrality, why should others follow us? If others don't engage us, we won't do it? Is this a conventional rule or a piece of genetic information engraved in our genes? Do we have to follow someone else's ass? This is our great power self-confidence?

China did have a certain resistance to carbon reduction in the early days of rapid development, but after air pollution became a topic of long-term concern for the whole people, China has changed from passive to active, and China's high-level has repeatedly stated that carbon neutrality is not what others want us to do, but we have to do
it ourselves.

Fossil energy is only a stage in the development of human civilization in the process of energy use, it can not be equated with civilization, and when human civilization's demand for energy rises to a level, it will sooner or later be swept into the garbage heap
of history.
China's national strength is rapidly expanding, and it is gradually moving to the center of
the world stage.
They are already standing at the center of the world stage, and isn't it a joke to follow what others do? Although carbon neutrality was not proposed by China first, we have become the main force
in the world to achieve carbon neutrality.
This means that the way forward may not be how others say how we go, but we have to come up with a plan and let others follow us
.

Not only carbon neutrality, but also in other areas, especially international
issues.
I think that in order to become a real power, we must first fundamentally change the inertia of thinking that "others propose me to follow", take the initiative to propose problems and solutions, and have enough appeal to call on the world to solve this problem, which is the real sense of the world power
.

Carbon neutrality is not a multiple-choice question, but a mandatory question

Regarding carbon neutrality, many people think "Is the EU still engaged in carbon neutrality?" "Is the United States still engaged in carbon neutrality?" "If Europe and the United States do not engage in carbon neutrality, will we still engage in carbon neutrality?" ”
。 I feel that carbon neutrality is just like a pure international political game, everyone will engage in it when the relationship is good, and everyone will break up
when the relationship is not good.
Completely forgetting the original purpose of carbon neutrality – to solve the climate crisis
.

Many people around the world have personally experienced the extreme heat this year, and the extreme heat is really away from the air conditioner and wants to explode
on the spot.
We have entered the era of the climate crisis
.
This extreme heat will only get worse in the future, like a leaky ship, everyone is fighting over who should do more to scoop water, and it does not affect the slow sinking
of the ship at all.
The current situation is that the water may have just reached the neck of the foot, so everyone still has room to discuss who should contribute more, who should contribute less, and by the way
, there will be fights.
When the water really reaches the neck, I am afraid that everyone will have no energy to do other things except to use the strength to eat milk to scoop the water out
.

To sum up, whether from the statement of the 20th Congress or from a realistic point of view, carbon neutrality must be achieved and will be achieved, no longer have doubts, find the subdivision track of carbon neutrality, practice hard when the economic situation is bad, roll up your sleeves and work hard when the economic situation is good, I believe you and I will witness the arrival of that day
.