-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
【Chemical Machinery and Equipment Network Market Analysis】According to incomplete statistics of Chemical Instrument Network, in June, there were 94 entries related to chromatography on the Chinese government procurement network, of which 54 sets of chromatography were counted, with a total amount of more than 19 million yuan in chromatography, involving 11 brands and 23 participating in procurement
.
It is worth mentioning that Shimadzu broke the record of Agilent's three-month consecutive hegemony and became the new winning bid in June, with a total of 3.
5178 million yuan, accounting for 25%
of the winning bid amount.
.
It is worth mentioning that Shimadzu broke the record of Agilent's three-month consecutive hegemony and became the new winning bid in June, with a total of 3.
5178 million yuan, accounting for 25%
of the winning bid amount.
(Note: This article is incomplete statistics, the data source is the clear public winning bid of the procurement amount and procurement quantity published on the Chinese government procurement website)
Since 2022, after the trough of the first four months, the chromatography market has shown a clear upward trend
since May.
In June, the amount of bids in the chromatography market fell by 16% compared to the same period last month, but the number of winning bids surged, up 108%
year-on-year.
Compared with May, although the number and amount of winning bids for chromatographs in June fell slightly, the entire chromatography market was relatively stable, especially the performance of domestic instruments
.
Among the 11 winning brands, 7 domestic instrument brands won the bid, which brought a successful end to the first half of 2022
.
since May.
In June, the amount of bids in the chromatography market fell by 16% compared to the same period last month, but the number of winning bids surged, up 108%
year-on-year.
Compared with May, although the number and amount of winning bids for chromatographs in June fell slightly, the entire chromatography market was relatively stable, especially the performance of domestic instruments
.
Among the 11 winning brands, 7 domestic instrument brands won the bid, which brought a successful end to the first half of 2022
.
From the point of view of chromatographic procurement
A total of 23 companies purchased chromatography
in June.
Among them, there are 9 universities, 5 quality inspection institutions, 3 environmental departments and 2 medical institutions
.
Only 1 research institute procures chromatography
.
in June.
Among them, there are 9 universities, 5 quality inspection institutions, 3 environmental departments and 2 medical institutions
.
Only 1 research institute procures chromatography
.
In terms of the proportion of purchased amount, a total of 23 sets of chromatography with the winning bid amount can be counted in June, with a total of 19.
894624 million yuan
.
Universities are also the main force in purchasing chromatography, purchasing a total of 21 sets of chromatography, with a total purchase amount of 7.
7449 million yuan, accounting for 39% of the total amount of chromatography won in June, ranking first
with absolute advantage.
The quality inspection agency purchased 7 sets of chromatography, with a total of 3.
7186 million yuan, accounting for 18% of
the total winning bid.
In third place was the environmental sector, which procured 14 chromatographic
kits.
Compared with quality inspection agencies, although the environmental department purchased a larger quantity, the purchase amount was lower, only 3.
6978 million yuan, accounting for 18%
of the total winning bid.
894624 million yuan
.
Universities are also the main force in purchasing chromatography, purchasing a total of 21 sets of chromatography, with a total purchase amount of 7.
7449 million yuan, accounting for 39% of the total amount of chromatography won in June, ranking first
with absolute advantage.
The quality inspection agency purchased 7 sets of chromatography, with a total of 3.
7186 million yuan, accounting for 18% of
the total winning bid.
In third place was the environmental sector, which procured 14 chromatographic
kits.
Compared with quality inspection agencies, although the environmental department purchased a larger quantity, the purchase amount was lower, only 3.
6978 million yuan, accounting for 18%
of the total winning bid.
Medical institutions and scientific research institutes purchased 4 sets and 1 set of chromatography respectively in June, with procurement amounts of 2,578,350 yuan and 775,000 yuan respectively, accounting for 19% and 4%
of the total winning bids.
of the total winning bids.
In the chromatography, where the winning bid amount can be counted, the average unit price of the instrument is 405,900
.
Among them, the highest amount of winning bid for a single unit came from medical institutions, and the Haifeng County Center for Disease Control and Prevention purchased the gas chromatograph Shimadzu GC-2030
for 1.
08 million yuan.
.
Among them, the highest amount of winning bid for a single unit came from medical institutions, and the Haifeng County Center for Disease Control and Prevention purchased the gas chromatograph Shimadzu GC-2030
for 1.
08 million yuan.
From the perspective of the winning brand of chromatography
In terms of quantity, 11 brands can compete in the market in June, including domestic brands such as Taiwan Zhangjia, Elit, Pengyu Changya, Qingdao Shenghan, Kezhe, Fuli, Hanbang, and imported brands Shimadzu, Agilent, Thermo Fisher, Waters, and Metrohm
.
Among them, Elit won the bid for 12 sets, Shimadzu won the bid for 8 sets, and Agilent and Taiwan Zhang Jia both won the bid for 6 sets
.
.
Among them, Elit won the bid for 12 sets, Shimadzu won the bid for 8 sets, and Agilent and Taiwan Zhang Jia both won the bid for 6 sets
.
From the perspective of the winning bid amount, Shimadzu's total winning bid amount reached 3.
5178 million yuan, accounting for 25%
of the winning bid amount.
Among them, the Haifeng County Center for Disease Control and Prevention purchased 3 sets of Shimadzu chromatography products at one time, and the winning bid amount reached 2.
03 million
.
5178 million yuan, accounting for 25%
of the winning bid amount.
Among them, the Haifeng County Center for Disease Control and Prevention purchased 3 sets of Shimadzu chromatography products at one time, and the winning bid amount reached 2.
03 million
.
Agilent's 2,838,800 winning bids ranked second, accounting for 20%
of the total number of bids.
The brand with the third largest winning bid amount is still the imported brand Worth, with a winning bid amount of 2.
141 million
.
of the total number of bids.
The brand with the third largest winning bid amount is still the imported brand Worth, with a winning bid amount of 2.
141 million
.
Judging from the winning bids of each brand from January to May, Agilent previously occupied the top
spot.
In June, the situation changed, and Shimadzu dominated the list and became the new "ring" winner
.
It is worth mentioning that compared with the fact that there was no domestic chromatographic instrument winning information in May, the domestic instrument performed well
in June.
In June, 7 domestic brands were listed on the winning list, with a total of 28 sets of winning chromatographs, with a total of 6.
6361 million
.
Although the form of domestic instrument brands is very good, from the perspective of the specific amount, it is not optimistic
.
spot.
In June, the situation changed, and Shimadzu dominated the list and became the new "ring" winner
.
It is worth mentioning that compared with the fact that there was no domestic chromatographic instrument winning information in May, the domestic instrument performed well
in June.
In June, 7 domestic brands were listed on the winning list, with a total of 28 sets of winning chromatographs, with a total of 6.
6361 million
.
Although the form of domestic instrument brands is very good, from the perspective of the specific amount, it is not optimistic
.
According to public data, although Taiwan Zhangjia and Agilent won the same number of bids, Taiwan Zhangjia won the bid amount of only 1.
3 million yuan; Elit won 12 sets of bids, with a total bid of only 999,600 yuan
.
In addition, the total number of successful bids reflects the same situation: the number of winning bids is higher, a total of 28 sets, but the total amount of winning bids is lower
.
Based on this background, on the one hand, it reflects that domestic instruments have been full of power and formed a good development trend
.
On the other hand, it also highlights the current problems of domestic instruments, that is, there are fewer high-end instruments, the single amount of instruments is low, and the innovation, competitiveness and market coverage are not strong
.
3 million yuan; Elit won 12 sets of bids, with a total bid of only 999,600 yuan
.
In addition, the total number of successful bids reflects the same situation: the number of winning bids is higher, a total of 28 sets, but the total amount of winning bids is lower
.
Based on this background, on the one hand, it reflects that domestic instruments have been full of power and formed a good development trend
.
On the other hand, it also highlights the current problems of domestic instruments, that is, there are fewer high-end instruments, the single amount of instruments is low, and the innovation, competitiveness and market coverage are not strong
.
From the perspective of the type of instrument that won the bid:
In June, ion chromatography won the largest number of bids, with a total of 15 sets, ranking first
.
Liquid chromatography and preparative liquid chromatography both won the bid for 13 sets, ranking second
.
10 sets of gas chromatography won the bid, and 2 sets of gel chromatography and 1 set
of thin layer chromatography won the bid.
In ion chromatography, the top three brands that can be counted as the number of winning bids are, Taiwan Zhangjia, Pengyu Changya, and Qingdao Shenghan, which won the bid for 6 sets, 5 sets and 2 sets
respectively.
.
Liquid chromatography and preparative liquid chromatography both won the bid for 13 sets, ranking second
.
10 sets of gas chromatography won the bid, and 2 sets of gel chromatography and 1 set
of thin layer chromatography won the bid.
In ion chromatography, the top three brands that can be counted as the number of winning bids are, Taiwan Zhangjia, Pengyu Changya, and Qingdao Shenghan, which won the bid for 6 sets, 5 sets and 2 sets
respectively.
From the perspective of the winning amount of various types of chromatography in June, the winning amount of liquid chromatography was 9,837,480, accounting for 49%
of the winning amount.
Compared with May, liquid chromatography increased by 322%
year-on-year.
The winning bid amounts of ion chromatography, gas chromatography, preparative liquid chromatography, gel chromatography and thin layer chromatography were 4,673,350, 3,764,694, 999,600, 470,000 and 149,500
respectively.
of the winning amount.
Compared with May, liquid chromatography increased by 322%
year-on-year.
The winning bid amounts of ion chromatography, gas chromatography, preparative liquid chromatography, gel chromatography and thin layer chromatography were 4,673,350, 3,764,694, 999,600, 470,000 and 149,500
respectively.
Chromatography is an important branch of analytical instruments, and it is also the core technology and key development point
of many instrument giants.
With the continuous improvement of analytical technology, the market competition of major analytical instrument companies has become more and more fierce
.
In the drastic market changes, especially for domestic instruments, only by taking into account the innovation trend and core technology, putting high-end products in the key position of development, and improving the value of individual products can we seize the competition point, improve the overall coverage of domestic instruments, and achieve the proportion advantage
of domestic products.
of many instrument giants.
With the continuous improvement of analytical technology, the market competition of major analytical instrument companies has become more and more fierce
.
In the drastic market changes, especially for domestic instruments, only by taking into account the innovation trend and core technology, putting high-end products in the key position of development, and improving the value of individual products can we seize the competition point, improve the overall coverage of domestic instruments, and achieve the proportion advantage
of domestic products.
Original: Market monthly reportJune chromatography winning bid data inventory Shimadzu becomes the new "master"
