Analysis of the market competition pattern of China's leading modified plastics technology enterprises in 2021

In terms of the number of patent applications, as of August 2021, the number of patent applications for modified plastics technology by Kingfa Technology was 158, and the number of patent applications for Plitter was 96

From a trend point of view, from 2010 to August 2021, Kingfa Technology was ahead of Plitter most of the time in the number of patent applications in the field of modified plastics

2) Kingfa Technology VS Plit-Comparison of patent market value in the modified plastics industry: Kingfa Technology’s patent market value is higher

As of August 2021, the total value of Kingfa's modified plastics patents is higher than that of Plitte, and the total value of Kingfa's modified plastics patents is US$11.

3) Kingfa Technology VS Plitte - Regional comparison of patent applications in the modified plastics industry: both patent applications are in China

At present, the application areas for the patents of Kingfa Technology and Plitte modified plastics are in China, as of August 2021

Statistical caliber description: Statistics are carried out according to the deduplication rule that each application displays a public text, and the latest text on the public date is selected for calculation

4) Kingfa Technology VS Plit-Comparison of patent types in the modified plastics industry: the two are mainly invention patents

As of August 2021, the patent application types of Kingfa Technology and Plitte modified plastics are mainly invention patents

5) Comparison of the composition of patented technologies in the modified plastics industry between Kingfa Technology and Plitte: The subdivisions of the two layouts are the same, but the focus area of ​​Kingfa Technology is more obvious

From the perspective of patent technology composition, as of August 2021, Kingfa and Plitter have the same type of TOP5 patent applications, "C08L23 homopolymer or copolymer of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons with only one carbon-carbon double bond.

From the perspective of the fields of modified plastic patents, Kingfa's modified plastic patents focus on the fields of polypropylene, composite materials, antioxidants and other fields

6) Kingfa Technology VS Plitter-Comparison of key patent layouts in the modified plastics industry: Kingfa Technology’s key patent layouts are cited more frequently

In terms of key patent layout, Kingfa's patent titled "Stress Whitening and Stress Cracking-Resistance Filled Modified Polypropylene and Its Production Method and Application" was cited the most, reaching 10 times

Plitter's patent titled "a chemical microcellular foamed long glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composite material with high melt strength and its preparation method" has been cited the most, 4 times

Note: ① When the analysis preference is selected as [All search results (not grouped)], [Show one publication per application], and [One patent representative per PatSnap family], this chart patent family uses the PatSnap family, and selects the publication The latest text calculations of the day

②Analysis preference When selecting [one patent representative per group of simple family] and [one patent representative per group of INPADOC family], this chart patent family uses the set deduplication method, and selects the latest text calculation on the publication date

7) Kingfa Technology VS Plitte - Summary of Patent Innovation Strategy in Modified Plastics Industry: Both are equivalent in terms of specialization and market promotion

On the whole, Plitter's modified plastics technology has a relative competitive advantage in terms of quantity growth, quality improvement and diversification, while Kingfa's modified plastics technology has a relative competitive advantage in academic drive
.
The two modified plastics technologies are comparable in terms of specialization and market promotion
.