echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > What are the types of multiple myeloma? What are the prognostic effects? See what the latest guide has to say!

    What are the types of multiple myeloma? What are the prognostic effects? See what the latest guide has to say!

    • Last Update: 2023-02-02
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Author: Blue Whale Xiaohu

    This article is authorized by the author to be published by Yimaitong, please do not reprint
    it without authorization.


    Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 1% of all cancers and about 10%
    of all hematologic malignancies.
    The incidence is slightly higher in men than in women, and the median age at diagnosis is about 65 years
    .


    Unlike metastatic bone tumors, osteolytic lesions caused by MM are not accompanied by new bone formation
    .
    Osteolytic lesions are the main cause of disability in MM and can be detected using low-dose whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI
    ).
    Other major clinical manifestations of MM include anemia, hypercalcaemia, renal failure, and increased
    risk of infection.
    About 1%~2% of patients have extramedullary lesions (EMD) at the initial diagnosis, and 8% of patients develop EMD
    later in the course of the disease.



    Evolution of the course of the disease: MGUS→SMM→MM


    Almost all patients with MM develop from an asymptomatic precancerous stage, monoclonal gammopathy (MGUS), which is of unknown significance
    .
    MGUS is seen in about 5% of people
    over the age of 50.
    MGUS progresses to MM and its associated malignancies
    at a rate of 1% per year.
    MGUS can progress to a more advanced asymptomatic precancerous stage called smoke-producing multiple myeloma (SMM).

    SMM progresses to MM at a rate of about 10% per year for the first 5 years after diagnosis, at a rate of 3% per year over the next 5 years, and at a rate of 1.
    5% per year thereafter, with a proportion of progression related to the type of cytogenetics of the disease, t (4; 14) Patients with translocation, del(17p) and gain(1q) are at higher risk of progression from MGUS or SMM to multiple myeloma
    .



    MM's inspection items


    The following surveillance programs are important guides for the diagnosis and molecular typing of MM and related diseases:

    • When MM is clinically suspected, a combination of assays should be used to detect the presence of M protein, including serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE), and serum free light chain (FLC).

    • Bone marrow examination should be performed at initial diagnosis and should include fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes designed to detect t(11; 14)、t(4; 14)、t(14; 16)、t(6; 14)、t(14; 20) Trisomy and del (17p) to clarify risk stratification

    • Gene expression profiling provides additional prognostic value

    • Osteolytic lesions are the main cause of disability in MM: focal osteolytic lesions can be detected using low-dose whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).



    Diagnostic criteria for MM


    The diagnosis of MM requires the presence of ≥ 1 myeloma-defining event (MDE), i.
    e.
    , end-organ damage (CRAB), and three specific markers (Table 1),
    in addition to bone marrow examination findings ≥ 10% clonal plasma cells or evidence of plasmacytoma confirmed by biopsy.
    Patients with MM have an approximately 80% risk of progressing to symptomatic end-organ damage in the presence of any of these markers, and testing these indicators can help diagnose MM and initiate treatment
    before end-organ damage occurs.


    Table 1.
    Myeloma defines events

    End Organ Damage (CRAB)

    Specific biomarkers

    • Hypercalcaemia (C): serum calcium above the upper limit of normal >0.
    25 mmol/L (1 mg/dL) or >2.
    75 mmol/L (11 mg/dL)

    • Renal insufficiency (R): creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min/1.
    73m2 or serum creatinine > 177 μmol/L (2 mg/dL)

    • Anemia (A): haemoglobin values below the lower limit of normal > 20 g/L, or hemoglobin < 100 g/L

    • Bone injury (B): CT/PET-CT shows ≥ 1 osteolytic lesion

    • Clonal bone marrow plasma cells≥ 60%

    • Serum free light chain (FLC) ratio≥ 100 (premised: FLC level≥ 100 mg/L)

    • MRI shows more than one focal lesion


    Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for MM should be diagnosed with plasma cell leukemia
    if the circulating plasma cells on the conventional peripheral blood smear ≥5%.
    The latest revised diagnostic criteria for MM and related diseases by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) are shown in Table 2
    .


    Table 2.
    Diagnostic criteria for MM and related diseases

    MM typing

    Diagnostic criteria

    MGUS

    All three criteria must be met:

    •Blood manifest clonal protein (non-IgM type) < 3 g/dL

    • Bone marrow clonal plasma cells < 10% a

    •Absence of end-organ damage associated with plasma cell proliferative disorders, such as hypercalcaemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone disease (CRAB)

    SMM

    Two criteria must be met:

    •Blood list clonal protein (IgG or IgA) ≥3 g/dL or urine monoclonal protein ≥500 mg/24 hours and/or clonal myeloid plasma cells 10%-60%

    •No myeloma-related events or amyloidosis

    MM

    Two criteria must be met:

    •Bone marrow clonal plasma cells ≥ 10% or biopsy-confirmed bone marrow/extramedullary plasmacytoma

    • Any one or more of the following MDEs:

    • End organ damage (CRAB) attributable to basal plasmacytic proliferative disorders

    • Percentage of clonal myeloid plasma cells≥ 60%

    • Involvement: unaffected serum free light chain (FLC) ratio≥ 100 (involved free light chain level must be ≥ 100 mg/L)

    • MRI shows > 1 focal lesion (≥5 mm)

    Plasma cell leukemia

    Two criteria must be met:

    •Meet diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma

    •Plasma cells ≥ 5 percent of routine peripheral smear leukocyte differential

    IgM monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (IgM MGUS)

    All three criteria must be met:

    •Serum IgM monoclonal protein <3 g/dL

    •Bone marrow lymphoplasma cell infiltration< 10%

    •Lack of evidence of anaemia, constitutional symptoms, hyperviscosity, lymphadenopathy, or hepatosplenomegaly attributable to an underlying lymphoproliferative disorder

    Light chain MGUS

    All criteria must be met:

    • Abnormal FLC ratio (< 0.
    26 or > 1.
    65)

    •Elevated levels of affected light chains (elevated κFLC in patients with a FLC ratio > 1.
    65 and lambdaflc in patients with an FLC ratio of < 0.
    26)

    •Immunofixation did not show immunoglobulin heavy chain expression

    •There is no end-organ damage attributable to plasmacytoproliferative disorders

    • Bone marrow clonal plasma cells< 10%

    •Urine monoclonal immunoglobulin < 500 mg/24 hours

    Solitary plasmacytoma

    All four criteria must be met

    •Biopsy-confirmed isolated bone or soft tissue lesions with evidence of clonal plasma cells

    •Normal bone marrow with no evidence of clonal plasma cells

    •Normal skeletal examination and MRI/CT of the spine and pelvis (except for primary isolated lesions)

    •Lack of end-organ damage (CRAB) attributable to lymphoplasmacytic disorders

    Solitary plasmacytoma with mild bone marrow involvement

    All four criteria must be met

    •Biopsy-confirmed isolated bone or soft tissue lesions with evidence of clonal plasma cells

    • Bone marrow clonal plasma cells< 10% b

    •Normal skeletal examination and MRI/CT of the spine and pelvis (except for primary isolated lesions)

    •Absence of end-organ damage (CRAB) attributable to lymphoplasmacytic disorders

    a For low-risk MGUS (IgG type, M protein <15 g/L, normal free light chain ratio) without clinical features of myeloma, bone marrow examination can be postponed b clonal plasma cell ≥ 10% of solitary plasma cell tumors should be classified as multiple myeloma
    MM molecular classification and prognostic impact



    Although MM is still considered a single disease, it is actually a collection of plasma cell malignancies formed by a variety of cytogenetically distinct (Table 3).


    Table 3.
    The main molecular cytogenetic classification of MM

    Cytogenetic subtypes

    Affected genes/chromosomes

    Approximate percentage in MM

    Hyperdiploid MMA

    Recurrent trisomy involving odd chromosomes, with the exception of chromosomes 1, 13, and 21

    45%

    IgH translocation MM

    40%

    t (11; 14) (q13; q32)

    CCND1 (cyclin D1)

    20%

    t (6; 14) (p21; q32)

    CCND3 (cyclin D3)

    5%

    t (4; 14) (p16; q32)

    NSD2

    10%

    t (14; 16) (q32; q23)

    C-MAF

    4%

    t (14; 20) (q32; q11)

    MAFB

    <1%

    Other IgH translocations (other cytogenetic abnormalities, or no abnormalities)

    5%

    a No IgH translocation is required; If an IgH translocation is present, it will be classified according to that abnormality


    Trisomy (hyperdiploid MM) is present in plasma cells in about 40% of MM patients, and most of the remaining translocations involve immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) sites (IgH translocation MM)
    on chromosome 14q32.
    A small proportion of patients have both trisomy and IgH translocations
    .
    Trisomy syndrome and IgH translocation are considered primary cytogenetic abnormalities and are present
    at the MGUS stage.
    Other secondary cytogenetic abnormalities can occur during the course of MM, including gain(1q), del(1p), del(17p), del(13), and secondary translocations
    involving MYC.


    Both primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities can affect disease course, response to treatment, and prognosis
    .
    Even for the same cytogenetic abnormality, patients have different prognostic effects depending on the stage of disease (Table 4).


    Table 4.
    Effect of cytogenetic abnormalities on the clinical course and prognosis of MM

    Cytogenetic abnormalities

    The clinical stage the patient was at when the abnormality was detected

    SMM

    MM

    Trisomy

    Moderate risk of progression with a median TTP of 3 years

    Prognosis is good, standard risk MM, median OS 7~10 years

    t (11; 14) (q13; q32)

    Standard progression risk, median TTP of 5 years

    Prognosis is good, standard risk MM, median OS 7~10 years

    t (6; 14) (p21; q32)

    Standard progression risk, median TTP of 5 years

    Prognosis is good, standard risk MM, median OS 7~10 years

    t (4; 14) (p16; q32)

    High risk of progression, median TTP of 2 years

    Intermediate MM with a median OS of 5 years

    t (14; 16) (q32; q23)

    Standard progression risk, median TTP of 5 years

    High-risk MM, median OS of 3 years

    t (14; 20) (q32; q11)

    Standard progression risk, median TTP of 5 years

    High-risk MM, median OS of 3 years

    gain (1q21)

    High risk of progression, median TTP of 2 years

    Intermediate MM with a median OS of 5 years

    del(17p)

    High risk of progression, median TTP of 2 years

    High-risk MM, median OS of 3 years

    Trisomy + any kind of IgH translocation

    Standard progression risk, median TTP of 5 years

    May improve poor prognosis and is associated with high-risk IgH translocation and del 17p

    Isolated chromosome 13/14

    Standard progression risk, median TTP of 5 years

    The effect on prognosis is unclear

    normal

    The risk of progression was low, and the median TTP was 7~10 years

    The prognosis is good, which may reflect a lower tumor burden, and the median OS > 7~10 years


    Reference: Rajkumar SV.
    Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.
    Am J Hematol.
    2022; 97(8):1086-1107.
    Reviewed: Quinta Typesetting: Cherry Executive: Moly



    Disclaimer: This platform is designed to deliver more medical information
    to healthcare professionals.
    The content published on this platform cannot replace professional medical guidance in any way, nor should it be regarded as diagnosis and treatment advice
    .
    If such information is used for purposes other than understanding medical information, this platform does not assume relevant responsibilities
    .
    The content published by this platform does not mean that it agrees with its description and views
    .
    If copyright issues are involved, please contact us and we will deal with
    it as soon as possible.



    Poke "Read Original" to see more

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.