-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
The 2022 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) will be held in offline + online format from August 6 to 9, 2022
>>>>
Research Background
Alectinib is the standard treatment option for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC
>>>>
Research methods
ALTA-2 (NCT03535740) and J-ALTA (NCT03410108) are open-label, single-arm, multicenter studies in patients with advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC
Figure 1 Study Design
>>>>
Research result
The analysis included 133 patients (ALTA-2, n=86; J-ALTA main cohort, n=47) with a median follow-up of 11.
Table 1 Patient baseline information
As shown in Table 2, after brigatinib treatment, the ORR of patients was 30.
Table 2 Treatment benefits of patients
The median PFS assessed by BIRC was 5.
2 months (95% CI, 3.
7-7.
3).
The PFS performance is shown in Figure 2, and the median OS was not reached
.
Figure 2 PFS manifestations of patients
The safety analysis showed that 66.
2% of patients experienced ≥ grade 3 adverse events during treatment, the most common being increased serum creatine phosphokinase (11.
3%), hypertension (10.
5%), and increased lipase (7.
5%) and pneumonia (5.
3%)
.
Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis of any grade occurred in 8 (6.
0%) patients, of which 2 (1.
5%) were early-onset
.
12% of patients discontinued due to adverse events
.
Analysis conclusion
In the ALTA-2 and J-ALTA trials, brigatinib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC whose disease had progressed after treatment with ALK inhibitors such as alectinib
.
Safety results were consistent with known analyses of brigatinib, and no new safety signals were observed
.
Progression patterns, drug resistance mechanisms and subsequent treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC²
>>>>Research Background
In the real world, data on progression patterns, resistance mechanisms, and subsequent therapy in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC are limited
.
Research methods
The investigator's center retrospectively collected data on patients who failed treatment with second-generation ALK-TKIs, including patients with disease progression after first-line alectinib therapy and enrolled in cohort 1 (n=20), followed by crizotinib Patients with disease progression after treatment with second-generation ALK-TKIs were included in cohort 2 (n=52)
.
Research result
The proportion of patients with central nervous system (CNS) progression (15% vs.
57.
7%, p=0.
001) and symptomatic CNS progression (5% vs.
32.
7%, p=0.
016) in cohort 1 was much lower than first-line crizole patients treated with tinib
.
The main resistance mechanism of second-generation ALK-TKIs is the resistance mutation in the ALK kinase domain (24/43, 55.
8%), especially G1202R (15/43, 34.
9%)
.
In addition, MET amplification, BRAF fusion, BRAF V600E mutation, KRAS amplification, KRAS mutation, and squamous cell transformation may also contribute to drug resistance
.
Subsequent ALK-TKIs were more effective in patients with ALK secondary mutations (excluding patients with ALK compound mutations) than those without ALK secondary mutations (242d vs.
75d, p=0.
05, HR=0.
46, 95%CI: 0.
18- 1.
2)
.
The ALK compound mutation that emerges after multiple ALK-TKIs treatment is the main mechanism of lorlatinib resistance
.
Some patients who received ALK-TKIs without a second biopsy had a poor response to subsequent ALK-TKIs, and biopsy results after multiple lines of therapy in such patients suggest that patients may be in the process of initial ALK-TKI therapy.
resistance has developed
.
For patients without ALK resistance mutations, 57.
2% of the overall population and 51.
8% of the deceased population received at least first-line chemotherapy, and chemotherapy resulted in better PFS than ALK-TKIs (median PFS 168d vs.
.
75d, p=0.
035, HR=0.
47, 95%CI: 0.
19-1.
2)
.
Analysis conclusion
Patients receiving first-line alectinib were less likely to have CNS and symptomatic CNS progression than first-line crizotinib
.
In the era of second-generation ALK-TKIs, secondary biopsy should be highly valued, and secondary biopsy may be beneficial to the selection of clinical programs and the evaluation of subsequent treatment effects
.
Patients should not lose the opportunity to chemotherapy, which remains an important treatment strategy, especially for patients who are not sensitive to targeted therapy
.
references
1.
MA13.
03 - Integrated Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib Following Alectinib Treatment in the ALTA-2 and J-ALTA Studies.2.
EP08.
02-009 - Progression Pattern, Resistance Mechanism and Subsequent Therapy for ALK Positive NSCLC in the Era of Second—Generation ALK—TKIs.
Edit: Youshi
Reviewer: Jiang Zhou
Typography: Youshi
Execution: Uni
END