echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Study of Nervous System > Trends in Cognitive Sciences Editor's Pick: 12 best reviews of 2020

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences Editor's Pick: 12 best reviews of 2020

    • Last Update: 2021-10-02
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    ▲ Click on the blue text above to follow CellPress Cell Science ▲ I am happy to show you our carefully selected 2020 Trends in Cognitive Sciences (IF 20.
    229) best articles
    .

    This collection includes reviews and opinion articles, reflecting the breadth of the field of cognitive science
    .

    Topic rich, the impact from the nature of consciousness and perception of language, to the depth of the neural network is to mimic the human learning process, as well as the existence of the "social brain" ( 'social' brain) and so on
    .

    This collection includes the most downloaded and cited articles of Trends in Cognitive Sciences in 2020, as well as some editorial recommendations
    .

    Hope you like this series
    .

    For comments, please contact tics@cell.
    com
    .

     Interested in publishing your review article in Trends in Cognitive Sciences? Please scan and submit the paper proposal (presubmission)
    .

    Perception prediction paradox Our brain needs to construct a real perception that can reflect the real state of the world from the noisy information that impacts the senses, as well as information perception that can convey unknown content
    .

    Some far-reaching theories believe that both perceptions are shaped by anticipation of the possible state of the world
    .

    However, the current interpretation models contradict each other as to how expectations affect the real perception or the shaping of information perception
    .

    The former (real perception) believes that perception is dominated by expectations, and the latter (information perception) believes that the intuition of event expectations is suppressed
    .

    In order to solve this paradox, Clare Press, Peter Kok and Daniel Yon from the University of London published opinions and proposed a two-process model
    .

    According to the interpretation of this model, probabilistic knowledge initially biases perception towards the expectation of possible things, and then biases it towards events that trigger a high degree of surprise
    .

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.