-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Lorazepam, also known by its brand name Ativan, is a benzodiazepine medication that is commonly used to treat anxiety and insomnia.
It is a synthetic compound that is created through several synthetic routes in the chemical industry.
The following article will discuss the various synthetic routes of lorazepam.
One of the most common methods for synthesizing lorazepam involves the use of p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH) as a catalyst.
This route involves the reaction of bromoethane with benzaldehyde in the presence of TsOH, followed by hydrolysis of the resulting intermediate with sodium hydroxide.
The product is then treated with sodium hypophosphite to form the desired benzodiazepine.
Another synthetic route for lorazepam involves the use of hydrochloric acid (HCl) as a catalyst.
This route involves the reaction of chloroethane with benzaldehyde in the presence of HCl, followed by hydrolysis of the resulting intermediate with sodium hydroxide.
The product is then treated with sodium hypophosphite to form the desired benzodiazepine.
Another synthetic route for lorazepam involves the use of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a catalyst.
This route involves the reaction of ethyl bromide with benzaldehyde in the presence of NaOH, followed by hydrolysis of the resulting intermediate with HCl.
The product is then treated with sodium hypophosphite to form the desired benzodiazepine.
Each of these synthetic routes for lorazepam has its own advantages and disadvantages.
For example, the TsOH-based route is generally considered to be the most efficient and economical, as it uses readily available reagents and avoids the need for expensive chromatography columns.
However, it is also more hazardous to handle, as it involves the use of toluene-based solvents.
The HCl-based route, on the other hand, is less hazardous to handle, as it involves the use of less toxic reagents.
However, it is also less efficient, as it generates a large amount of hydrochloric acid that