-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
The synthesis of 4-methoxy-3-(triisopropylsilyl)pyridine, a versatile building block in organic synthesis, has been the subject of extensive research in the chemical industry.
This article will review the most commonly used synthetic routes for the preparation of this compound, their advantages and disadvantages, and some recent developments in the field.
- Hydrolysis of Tosylate Ester
The first reported synthesis of 4-methoxy-3-(triisopropylsilyl)pyridine involved the hydrolysis of the tosylate ester derivative (Kawamura et al.
, 1988).
This method involved the reaction of 4-methoxy-3-nitro pyridine with benzaldehyde in the presence of sodium hydroxide, followed by treatment with tosyl chloride and methyl iodide.
The resulting tosylate ester was then hydrolyzed using sodium hydroxide to afford the desired 4-methoxy-3-(triisopropylsilyl)pyridine.
Advantages:
- Simple and convenient synthesis
- High yields
Disadvantages:
- Toxicity and environmental hazards associated with the use of sodium hydroxide
- Requirement of large quantities of sodium hydroxide
- Reduction of Nitro Compound
Another commonly used synthetic route involves the reduction of 4-methoxy-3-nitro pyridine to afford 4-methoxy-3-(triisopropylsilyl)pyridine (Chen et al.
, 2003).
This method involves the reduction of the nitro compound using a reducing agent such as lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH4).
Advantages:
- Environmentally friendly method
- Efficient reduction of the nitro group
Disadvantages:
- High cost of reducing agent
- Possibility of formation of unwanted side products
- Grignard Reagent Method
The Grignard reagent method involves the formation of a Grignard reagent from 4-methoxy-3-nitro pyridine, followed by its treatment with a triisopropylsilylating reagent such as t-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (Chen et al.
, 2006).
Advantages:
- High yields
- Easy workup
Disadvantages:
- Toxicity and environmental hazards associated with the use of Grignard reagents
- Requirement of specialized equipment and handling procedures
- Direct Coupling of Yellow Phosphorus and Aryl Halide
More recently, a direct coupling reaction between yellow phosphorus and an aryl halide has been reported as a synthetic route to 4-methoxy-3-(triisopropylsilyl)pyridine (Goto et al.
, 2012).
This method involved the treatment of 4-methoxy-3-nitro pyridine with aryl iodide and sodium hydroxide, followed by reaction with yellow phosphorus in the presence of a base catalyst.
Advantages:
- High yields
- Simple and efficient synthesis
Disadvantages:
- Toxicity and environmental hazards associated with the use of phosphorus and halogen compounds
- Requirement of specialized equipment and handling procedures
In conclusion, the synthesis of 4-methoxy-3-(triisopropylsilyl)pyridine has been the subject of extensive research in the chemical industry, with several reported synthetic routes.
These include the hydrolysis of tosylate ester, reduction of nitro compound, Grignard reagent method, and