-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
The synthesis of 3-thiophenecarboxylic acid, methyl ester is a crucial step in the chemical industry due to its broad range of applications in various fields such as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and dyes.
There are several synthetic routes to synthesize this compound, and each route has its own advantages and limitations.
In this article, we will discuss three of the most commonly used synthetic routes for the synthesis of 3-thiophenecarboxylic acid, methyl ester.
Route 1: via Weinreb Amide Synthesis
The first route involves the synthesis of a Weinreb amide, which is then reduced to the desired product.
The Weinreb amide is synthesized by treating phthalimidochloride with methylthiophenecarboxylate.
The resulting product is then heated with sodium hydroxide to cleave the phthalimide ring, yielding the Weinreb amide.
The Weinreb amide is then reduced with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst such as palladium on barium carbonate to yield 3-thiophenecarboxylic acid, methyl ester.
Advantages of Route 1:
- The Weinreb amide synthesis route is straightforward and relatively simple.
- It involves the use of readily available reagents.
- The yield of the desired product is good.
Limitations of Route 1:
- The Weinreb amide synthesis route requires the use of toxic reagents such as phthalimidochloride.
- The reduction step requires the use of hydrogen gas, which can be costly and dangerous.
Route 2: via Claisen Condensation
The second route involves the synthesis of 3-thiophenecarboxylic acid, methyl ester via the Claisen condensation reaction.
The synthesis of the compound involves the condensation of salicylic aldehyde and methyl thiophenecarboxylate in the presence of an acid catalyst such as sulfuric acid.
The resulting product is then treated with sodium hydroxide to yield the desired product.
Advantages of Route 2:
- The Claisen condensation route is a simple and safe synthetic route.
- The reaction is highly selective, and the yield of the desired product is high.
- The reaction can be easily scaled up.
Limitations of Route 2:
- The Claisen condensation route requires the use of a strong acid catalyst, which can be expensive and dangerous to handle.
- The synthesis of the starting materials, methyl thiophenecarboxylate and salicylic aldehyde, can be difficult and time-consuming.
Route 3: via Wharton's Trick
The third route involves the use of Wharton's trick, which involves the reduction of an acyl chloride using sodium in liquid ammonia.
The synthesis of 3-thiophenecarboxylic acid, methyl ester via Wharton's trick involves the treatment of methyl thiophenecarboxylate with sodium in liquid ammonia.
The resulting product is then treated with hydrogen chloride to cleave the ester group, yielding the desired product.
Advantages of Route 3:
- The Wharton's trick route is highly selective and yields the desired product in high yield.
- The reaction can be easily scaled up.
- The use of liquid ammonia as a reagent is relatively safe and easily handled.
Limitations of Route 3:
- The Wharton's trick route requires the use of liquid ammonia, which can be costly and difficult to handle.
- The reduction step requires the use of hydrogen chloride, which can