-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
The synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate is an important goal in the chemical industry due to its potential use as a precursor for the synthesis of various chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and other products.
There are several synthetic routes available for the synthesis of this compound, which can be broadly classified into three categories: organic, inorganic, and integrated.
Organic Synthetic Routes:
The organic synthetic routes for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate can be broadly classified into two categories: traditional and modern.
Traditional Organic Synthesis:
The traditional organic synthesis route for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate involves several steps, starting with the reaction of acetylene and phenylmagnesium bromide to form a Grignard reagent.
This reagent is then treated with an activated carbonyl compound, such as a derivative of acetaldehyde, to form the α-hydroxyketone.
This intermediate is then transformed into the target compound using a series of further reactions, such as the Wolff-Kishner reduction and the Wittig reaction.
Modern Organic Synthesis:
The modern organic synthesis route for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate involves the use of more efficient and selective reagents and catalysts.
One such route involves the use of a palladium catalyst in the presence of a phosphine ligand to cyclize an aromatic aldehyde to form a phenylprop-2-en-1-one, which is then hydroxyalkylated using a hydroxyalkylation reagent, such as a phenol or an alcohol, to form the α-hydroxyketone.
This intermediate is then transformed into the target compound using a series of further reactions, such as the Wolff-Kishner reduction and the Wittig reaction.
Inorganic Synthetic Routes:
The inorganic synthetic routes for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate involve the use of inorganic reagents and catalysts, such as metal hydroxides and metal carbonates.
One such route involves the reaction of phenylaldehyde with sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate to form the α-hydroxyketone, which is then transformed into the target compound using a series of further reactions, such as the Wolff-Kishner reduction and the Wittig reaction.
Integrated Synthetic Routes:
The integrated synthetic routes for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate involve the use of a combination of organic and inorganic reagents and catalysts.
One such route involves the reaction of acetylene and phenylmagnesium bromide in the presence of sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate to form the α-hydroxyketone, which is then transformed into the target compound using a series of further reactions, such as the Wolff-Kishner reduction and the Wittig reaction.
Advantages and Limitations:
The organic synthetic routes for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl 3-oxobutanoate offer several advantages, such as the ability to form complex molecules and to modify the molecule's properties, but also have several limitations, such as the need for expensive and toxic reagents, the low yield and purity of the product, and the potential for