-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
The Synthetic Routes of 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one(9CI) in the Chemical Industry: A Comprehensive Overview
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one, also known as compound 9CI, is an important synthetic intermediate used in a variety of chemical reactions.
It is a key component in the synthesis of a range of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and other specialty chemicals.
Due to its versatile nature and wide range of applications, the synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one are of great interest to chemists and chemical engineers working in the industry.
In this article, we will explore the various synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one, starting with the classical methods and moving on to the more modern approaches.
We will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method and highlight any potential challenges that may arise during the synthesis process.
Classical Synthetic Routes
The classical synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one typically involve several steps and can be rather complex.
One of the most common methods involves the use of nitrous acid to convert aniline into a nitro compound, which is then reduced to form the desired oxazine.
Another classical method entails the use of a condensation reaction between aniline and malonic acid, followed by a series of reactions to form the oxazine.
Advantages of Classical Synthetic Routes
The classical synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one have been well-established for many years, and they are still widely used in the chemical industry.
One of the primary advantages of these methods is their ability to produce large quantities of the desired compound at a relatively low cost.
Additionally, many of the raw materials used in these reactions are readily available and relatively inexpensive, which makes the synthesis process more economical.
Disadvantages of Classical Synthetic Routes
However, the classical synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one also have several disadvantages.
One of the major challenges with these methods is the potential for unwanted side reactions, which can lead to low yields and impurities in the final product.
Additionally, some of the reagents used in these reactions can be hazardous, requiring special handling and disposal procedures, and the overall synthesis process can be quite time-consuming.
Modern Synthetic Routes
In recent years, several modern synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one have been developed, offering several advantages over the classical methods.
One of the most common modern methods involves the use of microwave irradiation to accelerate the synthesis process, reducing the number of steps and the overall time required for the synthesis.
Another modern approach involves the use of transition metal catalysts, such as copper or palladium, to catalyze the synthesis reaction.
These methods are generally more efficient and produce less waste compared to classical methods, and they are also less likely to produce impurities in the final product.
Advantages of Modern Synthetic Routes
The modern synthetic routes for 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]oxazin-2(3H)-one offer several advantages over the classical methods.