-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
After more than ten years of popularization and application, stable fertilizer has formed an industry, with an annual consumption of more than 1.
4 million tons, and it has become a well-deserved new fertilizer leader in the corn growing areas of the northeast, southwest and central plains.
The use of stable fertilizers can achieve one-time application of corn base fertilizer without top dressing, which is the key to its popularity among farmers.
As stable fertilizer technology has become a hot spot in the new fertilizer market, many companies see business opportunities and invest in this field one after another.
This is a good thing, because it can further promote the rapid development of the stable fertilizer industry.
However, due to the lack of national supervision and the decline in agricultural planting efficiency, plus the overcapacity of the fertilizer industry and the fierce competition in the circulation link, the stable fertilizer industry A large number of fake and inferior products have appeared in the market, and false propaganda has emerged one after another, especially in the northeast and southwest regions.
There are mainly five cases of counterfeit and inferior stable fertilizers on the market: First, there are no distinctions between the models of stable fertilizers.
Type 1 and Type 2 stable fertilizers are produced with a single inhibitor (urease inhibitor or nitrification inhibitor), which has low inhibitor addition cost (some products), and has a short release time for controlling nitrogen fertilizers.
It is generally suitable for vegetables and other crops.
Only type 3 stable fertilizers have a long controlled release time for nitrogen fertilizers, which are suitable for corn planting.
The second is insufficient addition of inhibitors.
Inhibitors are "medicine" for microorganisms such as urease and nitrifying bacteria in the soil.
If the amount of "medicine" is insufficient, the effect will be compromised.
Third, no inhibitor was added at all.
In recent years, the random inspections of the market have found that some companies have labeled stable fertilizers on their product packages.
However, in actual inspections, it was found that the difference rate of urea residues and the nitrification inhibition rate were both zero.
That is, no inhibitor is added at all.
Fourth, the chemical nutrient content is insufficient.
In the past sample inspections of stable fertilizers in the market, it was found that cases of single nutrient or total nutrient failure have appeared, and individual small companies even secretly reduced the nutrient content by more than 5.
Fifth, falsely use the name of the Chinese Academy of Sciences or the Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology for publicity.
Some fertilizer companies did not have any technical cooperation with the Shenyang Applied Ecological Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and printed the names of the Chinese Academy of Sciences or the Shenyang Institute of Ecology on the packaging bags, falsely propagating.
If these problems in the current market are not stopped, it will inevitably affect the image of stable fertilizers in the minds of farmers and destroy the industry over time.
Especially in 2017, corn planting areas are facing the risk of continued decline in food prices, while the price of chemical fertilizers has skyrocketed, and farmers' willingness to invest has been frustrated.
Production and operation companies all want to use differentiated products to make profits, and they do not carry out technological and production innovations.
The new fertilizers on the current market have become unscrupulous companies making and selling fakes and fakes.
4 million tons, and it has become a well-deserved new fertilizer leader in the corn growing areas of the northeast, southwest and central plains.
The use of stable fertilizers can achieve one-time application of corn base fertilizer without top dressing, which is the key to its popularity among farmers.
As stable fertilizer technology has become a hot spot in the new fertilizer market, many companies see business opportunities and invest in this field one after another.
This is a good thing, because it can further promote the rapid development of the stable fertilizer industry.
However, due to the lack of national supervision and the decline in agricultural planting efficiency, plus the overcapacity of the fertilizer industry and the fierce competition in the circulation link, the stable fertilizer industry A large number of fake and inferior products have appeared in the market, and false propaganda has emerged one after another, especially in the northeast and southwest regions.
There are mainly five cases of counterfeit and inferior stable fertilizers on the market: First, there are no distinctions between the models of stable fertilizers.
Type 1 and Type 2 stable fertilizers are produced with a single inhibitor (urease inhibitor or nitrification inhibitor), which has low inhibitor addition cost (some products), and has a short release time for controlling nitrogen fertilizers.
It is generally suitable for vegetables and other crops.
Only type 3 stable fertilizers have a long controlled release time for nitrogen fertilizers, which are suitable for corn planting.
The second is insufficient addition of inhibitors.
Inhibitors are "medicine" for microorganisms such as urease and nitrifying bacteria in the soil.
If the amount of "medicine" is insufficient, the effect will be compromised.
Third, no inhibitor was added at all.
In recent years, the random inspections of the market have found that some companies have labeled stable fertilizers on their product packages.
However, in actual inspections, it was found that the difference rate of urea residues and the nitrification inhibition rate were both zero.
That is, no inhibitor is added at all.
Fourth, the chemical nutrient content is insufficient.
In the past sample inspections of stable fertilizers in the market, it was found that cases of single nutrient or total nutrient failure have appeared, and individual small companies even secretly reduced the nutrient content by more than 5.
Fifth, falsely use the name of the Chinese Academy of Sciences or the Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology for publicity.
Some fertilizer companies did not have any technical cooperation with the Shenyang Applied Ecological Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and printed the names of the Chinese Academy of Sciences or the Shenyang Institute of Ecology on the packaging bags, falsely propagating.
If these problems in the current market are not stopped, it will inevitably affect the image of stable fertilizers in the minds of farmers and destroy the industry over time.
Especially in 2017, corn planting areas are facing the risk of continued decline in food prices, while the price of chemical fertilizers has skyrocketed, and farmers' willingness to invest has been frustrated.
Production and operation companies all want to use differentiated products to make profits, and they do not carry out technological and production innovations.
The new fertilizers on the current market have become unscrupulous companies making and selling fakes and fakes.
