The Ministry of Ecology and Environment reported three cases of FAL fraud

Global Coatings Network News: The quality of environmental impact assessment documents (hereinafter referred to as "environmental impact assessment documents") is the "lifeline" of the environmental impact assessment system, which is directly related to the credibility and effectiveness

On August 26, 2022, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment announced three typical cases of Falsification of EIA documents, and praised

【Brief Introduction of the Case】

On July 2, 2021, during the on-site inspection of Nanjing Red Sun Biochemical Co.

After investigation, the wastewater biochemical sewage treatment station and its waste gas treatment facilities of the construction unit were actually completed and put into use

The above-mentioned acts of the construction unit and the unit that prepared the EIA documents violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 19 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of

At present, the construction unit, the responsible person, and the EIA preparation unit have paid the fine on time, and after the construction unit revised the EIA document and submitted it to the approval department and obtained approval, the organization organized the completion and acceptance

【Revelation Significance】

The environmental impact assessment system is a legal guarantee that restricts the environmental access of projects and planning, is the first line of defense to guard the green waters and green mountains in development, and plays an important role

【Brief Introduction of the Case】

In February 2020, Sichuan Tongyao New Material Technology Co.

【Investigation and handling】

The acts of the construction unit and the unit preparing the EIA violated the provisions
of the first paragraph of Article 20 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Environmental Impact Assessment.
According to the first paragraph of Article 32 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China, the Mianyang Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment decided to impose a fine of 500,000 yuan on the construction unit Sichuan Tongyao New Material Technology Co.
, Ltd.
and a fine of 50,000 yuan on the legal representative Deng
Mou.
Mianyang Qingxing Environmental Protection Technology Development Co.
, Ltd.
, the unit that prepared the environmental impact assessment, was fined
100,000 yuan.
At the same time, according to the untrustworthy scoring measures, the EIA preparation unit and the preparation host Xiao Mou were dealt with
separately.

At present, under the help and guidance of the Mianyang Beichuan Ecological and Environmental Bureau, the company corrected the illegal acts in a timely manner, signed a rental contract with 13 villagers and was no longer used for residential purposes, and the project has now obtained an environmental impact assessment and passed the acceptance
.

【Revelation Significance】

The ecological environment department regards the public's reporting clues as an important way to discover illegal problems, promptly initiates the investigation procedure, locks the facts of the falsification of environmental impact assessment documents and punishes them according to law, reflecting the resolute attitude
of the ecological environment department to strictly access the environment and strengthen supervision and law enforcement.

Third, Hainan Zhichuang Renewable Resources Recycling Co.
, Ltd.
environmental impact assessment documents fraud case

【Brief Introduction of the Case】

According to the Notice of the Department of Ecology and Environment of Hainan Province on investigating and handling the suspected illegal acts of environmental impact assessment documents in accordance with the law, the Qionghai Municipal Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau verified
the recycling and temporary storage project of waste lead-acid batteries of Hainan Zhichuang Renewable Resource Recycling Co.
, Ltd.
on February 25, 2022 。 It was found that the environmental impact report form of the construction project entrusted by the company to Guangxi Taisheng Environmental Protection Technology Co.
, Ltd.
was copied from the "Hainan Jiaxiang Kangqing Renewable Resources Recycling Co.
, Ltd.
Environmental Impact Report Form" of Qionghai City, and the parameters
of "particulate matter estimation of the reservoir exhaust cylinder" "sulfur dioxide" and "nitrogen dioxide" that were not related to the project appeared in the report table.
The Qionghai Municipal Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau opened an investigation
into the company's environmental impact report form for suspected fraud.

【Investigation and handling】

The act of copying and fabricating the value of pollutant parameters unrelated to the project in the environmental impact report form of Hainan Zhichuang Renewable Resources Recycling Co.
, Ltd.
violates the provisions
of the first paragraph of Article 20 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China.
According to the first paragraph of Article 32 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China, and with reference to the Provisions on the Discretionary Criteria for Administrative Penalties for The Ecological Environment of Hainan Province, the Qionghai Municipal Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau imposed a fine of 600,000 yuan on the company and 86,000 yuan on the legal representative of the company
on April 29, 2022.
The Department of Ecology and Environment of Hainan Province scored 20 points
on the untrustworthiness of the staff member Zhang Mou.
The Qionghai Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment revoked the EIA approval document
.
At present, the company has paid the fine on time, the project has stopped construction, and the re-preparation of environmental impact assessment documents is in the process of being submitted
for approval.

The Qionghai Municipal Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau simultaneously filed an investigation
into Guangxi Taisheng Environmental Protection Technology Co.
, Ltd.
, which was entrusted with the preparation of the report form.

【Revelation Significance】

Construction units should earnestly perform their main responsibilities, strengthen the constraints on the entrusted establishment units, clarify the responsibilities of all parties, and cannot "entrust them with one committee" and "throw their hands in charge" to avoid "losing their wives and folding soldiers.
"

(Source: Ministry of Ecology and Environment, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete)