-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
From the perspective of social sciences, the difference between the two is a commonplace ethical issue
.
Human consciousness determines social relations and psychological feelings, which in turn determines ethical orientation.
In the long process of natural evolution, humans have climbed to the top of the food chain pyramid
.
" The choices made based on this position are understandable .
"
Are relevant laws perfect?
During World War II, German Nazis used scientific experiments and eugenics to kill 6 million Jews, prisoners of war, and other innocent people through human experiments
.
After the defeat of Germany, the Nuremberg Tribunal formulated the basic principles of human testing while trying these war criminals as the international code of conduct for human testing, that is, the "Nuremberg Code", which was promulgated to the world in 1946
.
Then, the World Medical Association formulated the "Declaration of Helsinki", which formulated the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, and it was also the second international document on human testing, which was more comprehensive, specific and complete than the "Nuremberg Code
.
"
"In addition to the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, the three major international regulations involving human testing include the Belmont Report
.
" said Tang Huadong, a lawyer from Beijing Zhide Law Firm, "From a purely legal point of view, This British experiment should have been verified, but we don’t know whether unethical or even illegal behavior will occur at the specific implementation level
.
"
The report sparked heated discussion among netizens
As soon as the report of "the world's first human trial of the new coronavirus" was published, it quickly became a hot topic on the Internet and sparked enthusiastic discussions among netizens
.
On the one hand, netizens believe that this is a "human body as a guinea pig", and even the basic human right-the right to life has been given up.
It is a realistic version of "Unit 731"
.
On the other hand, some netizens believe that the United Kingdom can climb the peak of science by conducting human challenge tests in areas such as AIDS, Ebola virus, and mad cow disease, and make a great death test for human pathology!