-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Afatinib is an option for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm + ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a randomized controlled study
.
However, patients treated in real-world clinical practice, including elderly patients, patients with brain metastases, or patients with poor ECOG scores , were often excluded from these studies
Afatinib is an option for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm + ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a randomized controlled study
Recently, Professor Wu Yilong from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, as the corresponding author, published a prospective phase IIIb study (NCT01953913) in the journal Targeted Oncology , mainly to evaluate the treatment of Afatinib (afatinib) in the near real world.
The study is a single-arm, open-label Phase IIIb, near-real-world study conducted at 34 centers in Asia
.
Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day until tumor progression, no clinical benefit, or poor tolerance
The study is a single-arm, open-label Phase IIIb, near-real-world study conducted at 34 centers in Asia
Of the 577 patients enrolled in the trial, 541 received afatinib
Of the 541 patients, 412 were from China
In the overall population, nearly all patients (98.
In the overall population, the median TTSP was 14.
0 months (95% CI 12.
9-15.
9) and the median PFS was 12.
1 months (95% CI 11.
0-13.
6)
.
0 months (95% CI 12.
9-15.
9) and the median PFS was 12.
1 months (95% CI 11.
0-13.
6)
.
In the overall population, the median TTSP was 14.
Overall population TTSP and PFS
Overall Population TTSP and PFS Overall Population TTSP and PFSThe median TTSP (13.
8 months, 95% CI 12.
7 16.
1) and PFS (11.
4 months, 95% CI 10.
9 13.
7) of Chinese patients were similar to the overall population
.
8 months, 95% CI 12.
7 16.
1) and PFS (11.
4 months, 95% CI 10.
9 13.
7) of Chinese patients were similar to the overall population
.
The median TTSP (13.
Chinese population TTSP and PFS
China Chinese population TTSP and PFS population TTSP and PFSThe ORR for the overall population was 59.
1% (95% CI 54.
9-63.
3)
.
A total of 13 patients (2.
The ORR for the overall population was 59.
1% (95% CI 54.
9-63.
3)
.
A total of 13 patients (2.
4%) achieved a complete response and 307 patients (56.
7%) achieved a partial response
.
The median duration of objective response was 12.
2 months (95% CI 11.
1 to 13.
5)
.
The ORR for the overall population was 59.
1% (95% CI 54.
9-63.
3)
.
A total of 13 patients (2.
4%) achieved a complete response and 307 patients (56.
7%) achieved a partial response
.
The median duration of objective response was 12.
2 months (95% CI 11.
1 to 13.
5)
.
Among Chinese patients, progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.
9 months in patients with dose reductions, which was significantly longer than 11.
1 months in patients without dose reductions (HR 1.
46; 95% CI 1.
04-2.
04; P = 0.
0275)
.
The median TTSP was 11.
0 months for patients with brain metastases at baseline and 14.
4 months for patients without brain metastases (HR, 1.
29; 95% CI 0.
96-1.
73; P = 0.
0869)
.
Compared with patients without brain metastases, patients with brain metastases had significantly shorter progression-free survival (9.
2 months vs.
12.
9 months; HR 1.
45; 95% CI 1.
10-1.
90; P = 0.
0075)
.
9 months in patients with dose reductions, which was significantly longer than 11.
1 months in patients without dose reductions (HR 1.
46; 95% CI 1.
04-2.
04; P = 0.
0275)
.
The median TTSP was 11.
0 months for patients with brain metastases at baseline and 14.
4 months for patients without brain metastases (HR, 1.
29; 95% CI 0.
96-1.
73; P = 0.
0869)
.
Compared with patients without brain metastases, patients with brain metastases had significantly shorter progression-free survival (9.
2 months vs.
12.
9 months; HR 1.
45; 95% CI 1.
10-1.
90; P = 0.
0075)
.
Among Chinese patients, progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.
9 months in patients with dose reductions, which was significantly longer than 11.
1 months in patients without dose reductions (HR 1.
46; 95% CI 1.
04-2.
04; P = 0.
0275)
.
The median TTSP was 11.
0 months for patients with brain metastases at baseline and 14.
4 months for patients without brain metastases (HR, 1.
29; 95% CI 0.
96-1.
73; P = 0.
0869)
.
Compared with patients without brain metastases, patients with brain metastases had significantly shorter progression-free survival (9.
2 months vs.
12.
9 months; HR 1.
45; 95% CI 1.
10-1.
90; P = 0.
0075)
.
Taken together, the study shows that the safety data of afatinib (afatinib) in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC close to the real world are consistent with the known safety profile
.
Tolerability-guided dose reductions of afatinib allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit
.
.
Tolerability-guided dose reductions of afatinib allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit
.
Taken together, the study shows that the near-real-world study shows that the near-real-world study shows that the safety data of afatinib (afatinib) in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC in the near- real world are consistent with the known safety profile .
Tolerability-guided dose reductions of afatinib allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit .
The safety data for afatinib in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC were consistent with the known safety profile .
Tolerability-guided dose reductions of afatinib allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit .
Original source:
Original source:Tu HY, Feng J, Shi M, Zhao J, Wang Y, Chang J, Wang J, Cheng Y, Zhu J, Tan EH, Li K, Zhang Y, Lee V, Yang CT, Su WC, Lam DC, Srinivasa BJ , Rajappa S, Ho CL, Lam KC, Hu Y, Bondarde SA, Liu X, Tian Y, Xue Z, Cseh A, Huang DC, Zhou C, Wu YL.
A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: Final Analysis, with a Focus on Patients Enrolled at Sites in China.
Target Oncol.
2022 Jan;17(1):1-13.
doi:10.
1007/s11523-021-00859-6 .
Epub 2022 Jan 12.
PMID: 35020119; PMCID: PMC8783858.
A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: Final Analysis, with a Focus on Patients Enrolled at Sites in China.
Target Oncol.
2022 Jan;17(1):1-13.
doi:10.
1007/s11523-021-00859-6 .
Epub 2022 Jan 12.
PMID: 35020119; PMCID: PMC8783858.
Leave a comment here