-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Science and Technology Daily reporter Liu Xia
According to a recent report from the US Daily Science website, American scientists wrote in the latest issue of the British "E Biomedicine" magazine that they conducted a systematic review of relevant papers and literature, analyzed data from 3432 respiratory samples, and analyzed the nasopharynx Three methods of swab, oropharyngeal swab and sputum collection were compared
Early and accurate detection is essential to stop the spread of the new coronavirus and provide patients with appropriate care
In the latest study, a team of Dr.
Li said: "The gold standard inside and outside the hospital is nasopharyngeal swabs, but there are still many confusions as to which sampling method is the best and most sensitive
The researchers explained that nasopharyngeal swabs collect samples through the nasal cavity; oropharyngeal swabs collect samples by inserting a tube in the mouth; and sputum samples are usually collected by allowing patients to cough deeply to produce and expel sputum
Of course, this meta-analysis only includes studies on hospitalized patients, and other studies are needed for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients