Social Evaluation II: - What do we see from the dietary guide plate?

's just-released 2015 U.S. Dietary Guidelines have been met with unprecedented debate from all walks of life, with comments about what should be encouraged to eat? What are you restricted from eating? Each has concern and affection. The last time we published a representative article in the "praise" category, this issue we have collected some "criticism" comments, in particular, this article does not represent the views of the translator and the public number, only hope to bring you a "meal guide" multi-angle thinking.the U.S. Dietary Guidelines are appointed by a team of experts from the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health to first complete the collection of scientific evidence and write scientific reports, which are then reported to the Government Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health. The content of the final dietary guidelines is then developed by the relevant government departments on the basis of scientific reports. Some experts believe that the Scientific Committee report on which the U.S. dietary guidelines are based may not be perfect, but it is not. The scientific committee's excellent work has been subject to political compromise, a lament in the field of american nutrition policy and a disgrace in the field of public health.
. Dr. David L. Katzs is director of the Center for Preventive Medicine at Yale University and is an influential and well-known scientist at home and abroad specializing in public health areas such as public nutrition, weight control, and chronic disease prevention. His comments were sharp and poignent and widely disseminated in the circle of experts and society.

following is Professor Dr. David's criticism of the technical views of the new version of the guide, please refer to the attached web address.
2015 U.S. Dietary Guidelines retain key recommendations from scientific reports: such as healthy eating patterns, certain restrictive nutrients such as limiting saturated fatty acids and adding sugars1. But in the guide, the very exact words in the original scientific report are replaced with a lot of vague and uncertain language. For example, the guide recommends nutrient-dense foods several times, a term that seems to specify some exact food, but when you think about it, it's like saying nothing. Foods with high nutritional density may refer to orchids, or whole grains, or they may be Italian spicy sausages (editor's note: Americans like to eat pizza with Italian spicy sausage pepperoni).
2. This edition of the guide emphasizes ingesting from all food categories (eat from all food group) 2, but this means vague. The scientific report makes it clear that the American people in general eat less meat and more plant-based food. This recommendation is not clearly reflected in this edition of the guide.
and my colleagues have made several efforts to include sustainability in scientific reports. But in the published government version of the new American Dietary Guidelines, there is no such thing. Wondering why the basic principle of sustainable food supply cannot be adopted?
recommend limiting saturated fat and adding sugar, but do not indicate which foods should be avoided. There is only one possible reason, both to emphasize that eating less of a certain food would offend the interests of some large companies. Obviously the leadership of the council doesn't want to upset the bosses.
5. The content of the entire new dietary guidelines is not uniform. Surprisingly, the dietary guidelines don't specify the intake of processed meats, but say you can eat as long as restricted nutrient intake (sodium, added sugar, saturated fatty acids, and total calories) is within the recommended range. This statement, especially after the WHO report on processed meat products, is even more absurd.guidelines tell us to pay more attention to food than nutrients, but here we are told that as long as the nutrient levels we consume look good, it's no problem to eat unhealthy foods. The 2015 edition of the U.S. Dietary Guidelines doesn't take into account the national official nutrition policy and the "clear" dietary behavior recommendations advocated in the scientific report, especially when it comes to recommending what foods to eat more and what foods to eat less, using a variety of vague language,
After reading the whole article, we were most impressed that we might be able to eat whatever we want, and then all of us would be healthy. The reality, however, is that we are burning to prevent chronic diseases, and our health is being eaten up a little bit. And we are eating up the health of our children and grandchildren, eating up their food and drinking their water. In a deal, we are destroying our planet. If we keep the status quo and don't make any changes, health will be empty talk.people see politics, not scientific guidance, on this plate. The bad news is that the guide is bad, and the good news is that a guide is not a guide if no one follows it. So, let's go to the Report of the Scientific Committee on Dietary Guidelines (DGAC).
source: .. David L. Katz, MD, MPH, FACPM, FACP, FACLM
Director, Yale University Prevention Research Center; Griffin Hospital
President, American College of Lifestyle Medicine
Founder, The True Health Initiative
Follow at: LinkedIN; Twitter; Facebook
Read at: INfluencer Blog; Huffington Post; US News and World Report; About.comcompiled: Zhu Xinya : Original address and 2015 U.S. Dietary Guidelines are
1.
.
2.
.
3.
..