-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Scientists from many countries jointly write an article to refute the "laboratory origin theory" of the new coronavirus |
The open scientific data platform Zenodo released a preprinted paper jointly signed by more than 20 scientists from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and other countries on the 7th.
It pointed out that there is no evidence that the new crown virus originated in the laboratory, and there is no evidence.
It shows that any early cases of new crowns have any connection with Wuhan virus research
.
The authors of this review paper include Edward Holmes of the Mary Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety, University of Sydney, Australia; Stephen Goldstein of the Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, USA; Saskatchewan, Canada vaccine and infectious Disease organization University Angela Rasmussen, the British Medical Research Council Center of the University of Glasgow viruses such as David Robertson
.
The paper reviewed a large number of published studies on the traceability of the new coronavirus and concluded that, like most viruses that can infect humans, the most direct explanation for the origin of the new coronavirus is from animals
.
The known epidemiological history of the virus is similar to previous coronavirus outbreaks related to animal markets
The paper said that there is currently no evidence that the new coronavirus originated in the laboratory, there is no evidence that any early new coronavirus cases have any connection with the Wuhan virus research, and there is no evidence that the Wuhan Virus Research Institute owned or is studying the "predecessor" of the new coronavirus before the pandemic.
.
The author finally emphasized that there is a large amount of scientific evidence to support the animal origin of the new coronavirus
.
Although the possibility of the new coronavirus from accidental laboratory accidents cannot be completely ruled out, compared with the frequent human-animal contact that often occurs in the wildlife trade, the path of laboratory origin is extremely unlikely
Focus on the new crown pneumonia epidemic