-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
When a road and bridge maintenance department sprayed pesticides on poplar trees along a highway in Gaoling Town, Miyun, the pesticides fell on the hives of beekeeper Cao, causing a large number of bees to die
.
Cao sued the Conservation Department to the court for a claim of 60,000 yuan
.
Yesterday, the reporter learned that the Miyun Court ordered the Conservation Department to compensate Cao with 39,000 yuan
.
Beekeeper Cao introduced that on August 18 last year, when a road and bridge maintenance department sprayed pesticides on poplars on the side of the road, the pesticides were sprayed on his hives and the bees flying outside the hives.
The bees were poisoned and died in large numbers, causing direct economics.
The loss was 60,000 yuan
.
When Cao found the conservation office for compensation, the conservation office admitted the fact of spraying, but did not agree to compensation
.
Cao sued a road and bridge maintenance office to the court for a claim of 60,000 yuan
.
The conservation department argued in the court hearing that they sprayed pesticides on the trees in accordance with the contract with the Miyun Highway Branch.
The trees were sprayed at a distance of 10 meters from the horizontal distance of the hives.
The day of the spraying was windless, so it could not prove that the bees were because The spray died, so he did not agree to the plaintiff's claim
.
After the trial, the Miyun Court found that Cao was a professional beekeeper and held a beekeeping certificate issued by the Landscaping Bureau
.
On the day of the incident, the conservation department sprayed pesticides on poplars along the roadside of a highway in Gaoling Town, Miyun.
Cao’s beekeeping site was located on the south side of the highway in Gaoling Town.
After spraying with pesticides, a large number of bees died
.
After investigating the site and understanding beekeeping, the court held that, based on the facts ascertained and combined with the on-site video, when the maintenance department sprayed poplars on the highway, the pesticides would inevitably fall in Cao’s deposit.
On the beehive and the surrounding grass, pesticides falling on the beehive will inevitably lead to a large number of deaths of bees
.
In summary, the court ruled that the conservation department should compensate Cao’s bee with an economic loss of 30,000 yuan and a beehive’s economic loss of 9,000 yuan, totaling 39,000 yuan
.
.
Cao sued the Conservation Department to the court for a claim of 60,000 yuan
.
Yesterday, the reporter learned that the Miyun Court ordered the Conservation Department to compensate Cao with 39,000 yuan
.
Beekeeper Cao introduced that on August 18 last year, when a road and bridge maintenance department sprayed pesticides on poplars on the side of the road, the pesticides were sprayed on his hives and the bees flying outside the hives.
The bees were poisoned and died in large numbers, causing direct economics.
The loss was 60,000 yuan
.
When Cao found the conservation office for compensation, the conservation office admitted the fact of spraying, but did not agree to compensation
.
Cao sued a road and bridge maintenance office to the court for a claim of 60,000 yuan
.
The conservation department argued in the court hearing that they sprayed pesticides on the trees in accordance with the contract with the Miyun Highway Branch.
The trees were sprayed at a distance of 10 meters from the horizontal distance of the hives.
The day of the spraying was windless, so it could not prove that the bees were because The spray died, so he did not agree to the plaintiff's claim
.
After the trial, the Miyun Court found that Cao was a professional beekeeper and held a beekeeping certificate issued by the Landscaping Bureau
.
On the day of the incident, the conservation department sprayed pesticides on poplars along the roadside of a highway in Gaoling Town, Miyun.
Cao’s beekeeping site was located on the south side of the highway in Gaoling Town.
After spraying with pesticides, a large number of bees died
.
After investigating the site and understanding beekeeping, the court held that, based on the facts ascertained and combined with the on-site video, when the maintenance department sprayed poplars on the highway, the pesticides would inevitably fall in Cao’s deposit.
On the beehive and the surrounding grass, pesticides falling on the beehive will inevitably lead to a large number of deaths of bees
.
In summary, the court ruled that the conservation department should compensate Cao’s bee with an economic loss of 30,000 yuan and a beehive’s economic loss of 9,000 yuan, totaling 39,000 yuan
.
