-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
A computer analysis of nearly 12,000 genetics papers found that-
Research on human gene function is riddled with "shocking" errors
Our reporter Zhang Mengran
Today's viewpoint
A computer-aided analysis of nearly 12,000 papers on human genetics found that papers on the function of human genes were full of "shocking" errors, and the percentage of nucleotide sequence errors in the papers was unacceptably high
In fact, the wrongly identified nucleotide sequence represents a "double hazard"-the incorrect sequence itself and its related results may mislead ongoing experiments and the direction of future research
It may be accidental or academic fraud
According to a report from the British "Nature" website, this analysis found that in nearly 12,000 human genetics papers, more than 700 studies contained errors in DNA or RNA sequences
Researchers believe that the occurrence of these errors may be accidental, but there may also be academic fraud
Brian first discovered the problem in five research papers
Brian suspects that they may come from a "paper factory", that is, papers delivered by a third-party company based on "orders
At present, 4 of these 5 papers have been withdrawn
The error rate is unacceptably high
In 2017, Bryan collaborated with computer scientists at the University of Grenoble in France to create a software called "Seek&Blastn", which can identify and flag potential errors in research
For example, the software can extract short nucleotide sequences from papers and compare them with data in the open nucleotide database "Blastn" to check whether they match the human genome expected by the research
The research team used the software to screen related papers in the journals "Gene" and "Reports of Oncology" that had previously published problematic papers, including 7,400 original papers published in "Gene" from 2007 to 2018, and 3800 open access papers published in Oncology Reports from 2014 to 2018
After manual screening, the researchers found that about 12% of the nucleotide sequences in the "Report of Oncology" paper had problems; 2% of the "Gene" papers had the above problems
In addition, Brian and the research team also screened research papers in the subfield of cancer genetics that had problems before, and found that out of about 600 related papers, more than 25% of the papers contained errors in their nucleotide sequences
The researchers said that the percentage of papers with errors in the nucleotide sequence found this time is unacceptably high.
Is it just the tip of the iceberg?
Nucleotide sequence refers to the sequence of bases in DNA or RNA, and is the basis of a series of molecular genetics techniques
However, according to researchers’ estimates this time, about a quarter of the problematic papers may mislead or distract the development of human disease treatments in the future.
The team has sent e-mails to all relevant journals or publishers that can find the editor's contact information, and some of them have responded that they will investigate these problematic papers
But at the same time, the researchers also hope that this study will inspire other researchers and journals to find more problematic papers on human gene function, because they have greater concerns-the wrong papers found this time are just problematic.
The tip of the iceberg
.