Reflection on Fujian Daquan lysine company after losing the anti-dumping lawsuit

Introduction: Qiu meihui, Qiu meihui and VRA in 2002 is an extraordinary year for Fujian Quanzhou Daquan lysine Co., Ltd At the beginning of the year, the company filed the first anti-dumping lawsuit after China's accession to the WTO Near the end of the year, the industrial injury investigation bureau of the State Economic and Trade Commission sent a fax to the company to formally report the investigation results: the sales of feed grade L-lysine in China of the United States, South Korea and Indonesia had dumping behavior, but there was no substantial harm This result means that the anti-dumping lawsuit led by Daquan company ended in failure VRA talked about the anti-dumping experience of feed grade L-lysine industry Dong Yijun, general manager of Daquan lysine Co., Ltd admitted that he felt helpless about the result But he also said that he has gained a lot of experience from this anti-dumping lawsuit and realized that our ability to adapt to the new rules needs to be improved after China's accession to the WTO In particular, it is necessary to establish an enterprise financial system in line with the international financial system as soon as possible For example, in cost accounting, which should be included in the cost, which should not be included in the cost and so on He reflected that, this time, we largely lost in the way of calculating the cost of products that did not meet the requirements of WTO rules, which led to high cost According to Dong Yijun, VRA, since 1998, the sales volume of lysine market in China has declined sharply The main reason is that a large amount of lysine from the United States, South Korea and Indonesia has poured into China's market, and the volume growth rate is amazing Under the impact of foreign products, China's lysine enterprises have lost most of their profits and even lost money Quanzhou Daquan lysine Co., Ltd is no exception, the company once shut down for three months In this case, Quanzhou Daquan lysine Co., Ltd., Sichuan ChuanHua weizhisu Co., Ltd and Guangxi Guiyuan lysine Co., Ltd started to fight back together On May 13, 2001, on behalf of China's feed grade L-lysine hydrochloride industry, three major manufacturers filed an application for anti-dumping investigation of imported feed grade L-lysine hydrochloride originating in the United States, South Korea and Indonesia The industrial damage investigation bureau of the State Economic and Trade Commission formally filed a case on June 19, 2001 It is reported that this is the first anti-dumping hearing held in China after China became a member of WTO, and also the first anti-dumping hearing after the new anti-dumping regulations come into force But after nearly a year's expectation, VRA was defeated Dong Yijun was surprised, disobeyed and wronged at first, but when he calmly understood the reason of losing the lawsuit, he fell into a deep reflection Mr Dong Yijun said, "I didn't understand until I lost the lawsuit At present, the cost of domestic lysine enterprises is too high." 2.8 tons of starch can produce 1 ton of lysine, and the price per ton of starch is up to 2000 yuan In fact, if we use sugarcane leftovers, 7 tons of molasses can produce 1 ton of lysine, and the price per ton of molasses is only 500 yuan But for a long time, the domestic enterprises have not paid attention to the technical innovation in this area, only know to concentrate on production, but have not studied and improved the acid production rate and the proposed rate In fact, taking Daquan lysine Co., Ltd as an example, for every 1% increase in acid production rate, the enterprise can increase its monthly income by 400000 yuan By contrast, the low price of foreign enterprises is lower in the cost According to the officials participating in the survey, when people decompose the product composition, the proportion of cost in the total price is much lower than that of domestic products, so they can't complain about the low price According to the reporter, VRA, so far, in the case of domestic enterprises losing anti-dumping, although there are various reasons, there is one thing in common, that is, domestic enterprises have not introduced the international common practice in financial calculation, and enterprises are fascinated by their "usual algorithm", thinking that their cost is very low, thinking that they are being bullied The experience of Daquan company gives a revelation to domestic enterprises: anti-dumping is indeed a handy weapon to defend the market, but when using this weapon, we must first make ourselves impeccable to win The key is to improve the core competitiveness of enterprises To improve the competitiveness, we must try our best to reduce costs As long as the cost is really reduced, we are not afraid of any calculation VRa