echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Professor Zhou Caicun: First-line treatment of immune combined chemotherapy brings long-term hope to NSCLC patients

    Professor Zhou Caicun: First-line treatment of immune combined chemotherapy brings long-term hope to NSCLC patients

    • Last Update: 2022-11-04
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    *For medical professionals reading only refers to the physician's obligation to inform patients of the 5-year survival rate
    .


    2018 is the "first year" of first-line immune therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and four recognized landmark phase III clinical studies: KEYNOTE-189, KEYNOTE-407, KEYNOTE-042, and CheckMate-227 have successively announced the results of the study
    。 Among them, KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-407 are global multicenter, randomized double-blind controlled phase III clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with platinum-containing chemotherapy that have reached the primary study endpoint.



    During these four years, immunotherapy has rewritten the treatment guidelines for advanced squamous and non-squamous NSCLC, including in China and the United States, making immuno+chemotherapy the standard first-line treatment
    for patients with advanced NSCLC.


    FIVE-YEAR OS DATA FOR KEYNOTE-189 AND KEYNOTE-407, PRESENTED AT THE 2022 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (ESMO) ANNUAL MEETING [1,2], SHOWED THAT PEMBROLIZUMAB (K DRUG) COMBINED WITH PLATINUM-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMEN CONFINED BETTER LONG-TERM SURVIVAL THAN PLATINUM-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY, WITH A 5-YEAR OS OF 19.
    4% AND 18.
    4% FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED NON-SQUAMOUS NSCLC OR SQUAMOUS NSCLC, RESPECTIVELY, AND 11.
    3% FOR CHEMOTHERAPY.
    and 9.
    7%.


    The K-drug combination chemotherapy regimen became the world's first immuno-combination
    chemotherapy first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with 5-year OS rate data.


    FIGURE 1 KEYNOTE-189 5 YEARS OS1


    FIGURE 2 KEYNOTE-407 5 YEARS OS2


    Also published are 5-year PFS (survival without disease progression) data
    from the KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-407 studies.
    At year 5, 7.
    5% and 10.
    8% of patients with non-squamous and squamous NSCLC still had no disease progression, respectively, compared with 0.
    6% and 3.
    5%
    of the 5-year PFS rates in the control chemotherapy group.


    FIGURE 3 KEYNOTE-189 5 PFS1


    FIGURE 4 KEYNOTE-407 5 YEAR PFS2


    At present, 4 original PD-1 monoclonal antibodies have been approved for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC
    in combination with chemotherapy.
    These phase III clinical studies of PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, whether in squamous or non-squamous NSCLC, had the primary endpoint PFS, not OS, and included varying proportions of patients with stages IIIB and IIIC [3-8].


    At present, only the 2-year OS rate (53.
    4% vs 35.
    0%) and 3-year OS rate (42.
    8% vs 23.
    7%) data of the first-line clinical study of carrelizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of stage III.
    b-IV.
    squamous NSCLC (CameL-sq) were presented orally by Professor Zhou Caicun of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital affiliated to Tongji University at the 2022 European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC) [9].


    Overlapping indications are a common situation faced by clinicians, and how to evaluate the efficacy of different PD-1 monoclonal antibody treatments has become a key to choosing a
    treatment plan.


    Is the 5-year OS rate of KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-407 meaningful to guide the current clinical practice of advanced NSCLC treatment in China? Is it necessary to follow KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-407 with the many PD-(L)1 combination chemotherapy regimens that are currently widely used in clinical practice to demonstrate long-term follow-up OS and PFS data to demonstrate long-term survival benefits?


    CAN PATIENTS IN THE KEYNOTE-189 AND KEYNOTE-407 STUDIES WHO HAVE NO DISEASE PROGRESSION AT YEAR 5 AFTER TREATMENT WITH DRUG K-THERAPY CONSIDERED CLINICALLY CURED?


    Recently, this platform invited Professor Zhou Caicun to answer
    these questions.


    Is long-term survival a true indicator of the efficacy of immunotherapy?


    Professor Zhou Caicun: In the era of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced lung cancer, we all use OS as the main evaluation index
    of anti-tumor drugs.


    In the era of chemotherapy, the OS benefit of chemotherapy was limited, with a median OS extension of only two months
    .
    Later, the antiangiogenic drug bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy extended median OS by two months to six months
    .
    Although many targeted therapies prolong PFS compared with chemotherapy, the overall OS benefit is similar
    to that of chemotherapy.


    Therefore, in the era of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced lung cancer, we can see changes in median OS, but we rarely see 3-year or 5-year survival data
    .
    However, the revolution brought about by immunotherapy has given us a glimpse of 5-year survival rates
    for patients with advanced lung cancer.


    The 5-year survival rate is a criterion for clinical cure of tumors, and the 5-year survival rate has improved, which also means that more tumor patients have been
    cured clinically.
    Therefore, in the era of immunotherapy, it is obviously not sufficient to evaluate the improvement of OS, and we need to evaluate the 3-year and 5-year survival rates
    brought by PD-1 treatment.
    That is to say, in the era of immunotherapy, whether a regimen can improve the 3-year and 5-year survival rates, and how many patients can be clinically cured, is a more important question
    than how much the median OS is prolonged.


    Currently, for immunotherapy, we need long-term follow-up to obtain data
    on 4-year and 5-year survival.
    Long-term survival should become a very important efficacy assessment index
    for future clinical research.


    PD-L1 stratified OS data from the KEYNOTE-189 study showed that the 5-year OS rate for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% was 29.
    6% (control 21.
    4%, HR = 0.
    68 [0.
    40-0.
    96]), which was higher than PD-L1 in 1% to 49% of PD-L1 TPS population (control group 7.
    7%, HR=0.
    65 [0.
    46-0.
    90] and PD-L1 TPS <1% 9.
    6% of the population (control 5.
    3%, HR = 0.
    55 [0.
    39-0.
    76]).

    The KEYNOTE-407 study also showed that the 5-year OS rate decreased
    with PD-L1 expression.
    How do you see the significance of this set of data?


    Prof.
    Caicun Zhou:
    The 5-year OS data results of KEYNOTE-024 show that the 5-year OS rate of 50% of the population with the first-line treatment of PD-L1 TPS ≥with K drug alone is 31.
    9%, while the 5-year OS rate data of 29.
    6% of the corresponding population in the KEYNOTE-189 study is similar in value, which tells us that for this group of people, the first-line treatment of K drug is sufficient without adding chemotherapy
    .


    However, in clinical practice, it is still necessary to analyze on a case-by-case basis
    .
    For example, if the patient has a large tumor burden or does not smoke, despite PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, I think it may be safer
    to choose a treatment regimen with K drugs combined with chemotherapy.
    Because of the high tumor burden and the need for rapid tumor shrinkage, the effect of K drug combined with chemotherapy will be faster; Patients who do not smoke tend to have a low tumor mutation burden (TMB) and may be less effective with immunomonotherapy, so choosing K drug plus chemotherapy may be more effective than K drug monotherapy
    .


    Another important significance for clinical practice is that although the 5-year OS rate of non-squamous NSCLC with low or negative expression of PD-L1 is lower than that of people with high expression of PD-L1, it is also significantly improved
    compared with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens.
    This set of data means that the combination of K and chemotherapy regimens can also bring 5-year survival to a subset of this group of patients, supporting this regimen as standard first-line treatment
    for patients with PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC.


    Reporter: With so many PD-1 combination chemotherapy regimens, how should doctors communicate with patients about the efficacy of different regimens? Do you need to inform long-term survival data?


    Prof.
    Caicun Zhou:
    Patients with advanced NSCLC in China are lucky because there are so many immune treatment options
    available.
    But if there are more solutions, it will also bring "happy troubles"
    .
    Physicians should fully explain to patients the short-, medium- and long-term efficacy and safety
    of different PD-1s.


    The median OS data of several PD-1 combination chemotherapy regimens that have been applied to clinical practice are similar, and the survival and mortality risk reduction brought by chemotherapy regimens are similar, but in addition to fully informing patients of these data, we must also inform patients in an easy-to-understand way whether each PD-1 has long-term survival data
    .


    As a patient, it's important to live a few months longer, but it's even more important to know what the chances are that treatment options can help achieve survival
    for 3, 5, or even longer.
    If a regimen can give patients a 20% chance of survival at 5 years, then of course the patient will choose this regimen
    .


    Can patients who remain disease progression at 5 years of follow-up be considered clinically cured? There is no answer to
    this question at the moment.
    Although, in clinical practice, we have found that patients who live longer than 3 years tend to have a greater probability of surviving 4 or even 5 years, to answer this question, we need to look at longer follow-up
    .


    SO, I ALSO EXPECT THAT IN THE FUTURE, KEYNOTE-189 AND KEYNOTE-407 WILL BRING US 7 AND 10 YEARS OF OS RATE DATA
    .
    This is of great significance
    to patients, doctors and clinical researchers.


    Expert profile
    Professor Zhou Caicun


    Title: chief physician, professor, doctoral supervisor, enjoy special allowance of the State Council;

    : Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Cancer Institute of Tongji University School of Medicine

    CSCO Institute Appointments: Executive Committee

    Other societies: Chairman of CSCO Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Committee, Chairman of Thoracic Tumor Branch of China Medical Promotion Association, Chairman of Lung Cancer Molecular Targeting and Immunotherapy Committee of Shanghai Anti-Cancer Association, Member of Education Committee of International Lung Cancer Federation (IASLC), Member of Tobacco Control Committee of International Lung Cancer Union (IASLC), Member of Standing Committee of Lung Cancer Professional Committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Vice Chairman of Cancer Drug Clinical Research Professional Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association, Member of the Standing Committee of the Oncology Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Vice President of the Oncology Branch of the Shanghai Medical Doctor Association, and Vice Chairman of the Oncology Branch of the Shanghai Medical Association

    Areas of expertise/long-term engagement: precision treatment of lung cancer, immunotherapy for lung cancer, early diagnosis of lung cancer, and research on lung cancer transformation

    Major achievements: Shanghai leading talent, head of Shanghai's top priority respiratory disease key discipline, has been funded by nearly 20 various scientific research projects, including the National 863 Program, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, etc
    .
    LED OR PARTICIPATED IN MORE THAN 30 LARGE-SCALE CLINICAL STUDIES, INCLUDING OPTIMAL, BEYOND, ETC
    .

    Publications: More than 200 publications, Lancet Oncology, JCO, Annals of Oncology, JTO, IJC, Cancer, etc

    Awards: First Prize of Science and Technology Award of China Anti-Cancer Association, First Prize of Huaxia Medical Science and Technology Award, Second Prize of China Medical Science and Technology Award, Second Prize of Shanghai Anti-Cancer Science and Technology Award, First Prize of Shanghai Medical Science and Technology Award, Second Prize of Chongqing Science and Technology Progress Award


    Resources:

    [1].
    M.
    C.
    Garassino et al.
    , KEYNOTE-189 5-year update: First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) + pemetrexed (pem) and platinum vs placebo (pbo) + pem and platinum for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, 2022 ESMO, Abs #973MO

    [2].
    S.
    Novello et al.
    , 5-year update from KEYNOTE-407: Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 2022 ESMO,Abs # 974MO

    [3].
    Caicun Zhou et al.
    , Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CameL): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial, Published Online December 18, 2020 https://doi.
    org/10.
    1016/ S2213-2600(20)30365-9

    [4].
    Zhou CC, Ren SX, Chen JH, et al.
    Camrelizumab or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced squamous NSCLC (CameL-sq): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase Ⅲ trial[EB/OL].
    ELCC 2021, abstract 96O.

    [5].
    Yang YP et al.
    , Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum as First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-squamous NSCLC: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study (Oncology pRogram by InnovENT anti-PD-1-11), J Thorac Oncol.
    2020 Oct; 15(10):1636-1646.
    doi: 10.
    1016/j.
    jtho.
    2020.
    07.
    014.
    Epub 2020 Aug 8.

    [6].
    Zhou C et al.
    , Sintilimab Plus Platinum and Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial (ORIENT-12).
    J Thorac Oncol.
    2021 Sep; 16(9):1501-1511.
    doi: 10.
    1016/j.
    jtho.
    2021.
    04.
    011.
    Epub 2021 May 25.

    [7].
    Lu S, Yu Y, Yu X, et al.
    Tislelizumab+ chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (nsqNSCLC)[C]//ESMO Annual Meeting.
    2020

    [8].
    Wang J.
    , Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone as First-line Treatment for Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA Oncol.
    2021 May 1; 7(5):709-717.
    doi: 10.
    1001/jamaoncol.
    2021.
    0366.

    [9].
    Zhou CC, First-line camrelizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated overall survival results from the phase III CameL-sq trial.
    3MO.
    2022 ELCC.


    *This article is only for providing scientific information to medical professionals and does not represent the views of this platform


    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.