echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Oncologist: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with complete neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) did not improve prognosis

    Oncologist: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with complete neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) did not improve prognosis

    • Last Update: 2022-04-22
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Complete neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) improves tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone
    .


    However, the effect of TNT on patient survival has not been adequately studied


    Complete neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) improves tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone


    The study retrospectively included 311 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ChemoRT) + surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy, while 313 patients received TNT (fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy.
    chemotherapy) ± surgery
    .


    The CR rate after neoadjuvant therapy was evaluated in the two groups, and the disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were compared between the two groups


    The study retrospectively included 311 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ChemoRT) + surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy, while 313 patients received TNT (fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy.


    The average age of the patients in the ChemoRT group was older than that in the TNT group (P<0.
    001); the proportion of cT4 patients and lymph node positive in the TNT group was higher than that in the chemoRT group
    .


    The 2-year overall CR rate (pathologic CR or cCR) was higher in the TNT group than in the ChemoRT group (27% vs.


    The average age of the patients in the ChemoRT group was older than that in the TNT group (P<0.


    Median follow-up was similar in both groups: 4.


    We found that across the entire cohort, complete responders had significantly improved DFS compared with incomplete responders (Wald and log-rank P<0.
    0001), and also in the ChemoRT (log-rank P=0.
    016) and TNT groups Same (log-rank P<0.
    0001).

    We found that across the entire cohort, complete responders had significantly improved DFS compared with incomplete responders (Wald and log-rank P<0.
    0001), and also in the ChemoRT (log-rank P=0.
    016) and TNT groups The same (log-rank P<0.
    0001).
    We found that in the entire cohort, complete responders had significantly improved DFS compared with incomplete responders (Wald and log-rank P<0.
    0001), and also in the ChemoRT group (log -rank P = 0.
    016) as well as the TNT group (log-rank P < 0.
    0001).

    Univariate analysis found that DFS was not significantly associated with the type of neoadjuvant therapy (HR=1.
    3; 95%CI 0.
    93-1.
    80; P=0.
    11)
    .

    Univariate analysis found that DFS was not significantly associated with the type of neoadjuvant therapy (HR=1.
    3; 95%CI 0.
    93-1.
    80; P=0.
    11)
    .


    Univariate analysis found that DFS was not significantly associated with the type of neoadjuvant therapy (HR=1.


    In conclusion, the study showed that the application of TNT modality in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not improve prognosis, but the high response rate may give more patients the opportunity to preserve the rectum
    .

    In conclusion, the study showed that the application of TNT modality in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not improve prognosis, but the high response rate may give more patients the opportunity to preserve the rectum
    .


    Studies have shown that the use of TNT modality in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not improve prognosis, but a high response rate may give more patients the opportunity to preserve the rectum


    Original source:

    Original source:

    Kim JK, Marco MR, Roxburgh CSD,  et al .


    Kim JK, Marco MR, Roxburgh CSD,  et al .
    Survival After Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
    Oncologist.
    2022 Mar 12:oyac025.
    doi: 10.
    1093/oncolo/oyac025.
    Epub ahead of print.
    PMID: 35278070.
    Kim JK, Marco MR, Roxburgh CSD,  et al .
    Survival After Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
    Oncologist.
    2022 Mar 12:oyac025.
    doi: 10.
    1093/oncolo/oyac025.
    Epub ahead of print.
    PMID: 35278070.
    Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.