Notice of the Tianjin Municipal Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission on the Issuance of Municipal Supervision and Inspection Information on Food Production (11th Batch 2018)

Recently, the Tianjin Municipal Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission organized the Tianjin Food Safety Inspection Technology Research Institute and other 4 food testing institutions, in accordance with the "Tianjin food production link municipal sampling monitoring work programme", sampling sugar, pastries, soy products, meat products, convenience food, food additives, frozen Food, frozen beverages, cooking oil, grease and its products, grain processing products, starch and starch products, tea and related products, bee products and other 13 categories of 232 batches of samples, sampling and inspection items qualified samples 224 batches, unqualified samples 8 batches.
according to national standards for food safety, individual items are not qualified, its products are judged to be unqualified products.
specific information is as follows: First, the overall situation: sugar 7 batches, unqualified samples 1 batch; pastry 37 batches, unqualified samples 1 batch; soy products 17 batches, unqualified samples 1 batch; meat products 38 batches, unqualified samples 1 batch; convenient food 8 batches, unqualified samples 1 batch; food products Additives 29 batches, unqualified samples 3 batches; frozen food 31 batches; frozen drinks 6 batches; edible oil, grease and its products 20 batches; food processing products 23 batches; starch and starch products 8 batches; tea and related products 4 batches; bee products 4 batches, all did not detect unqualified samples.
II, non-conforming product situation: (1) Tianjin Zhongkang Huasheng Food Co., Ltd. produced the "Mian white sugar" label is not qualified (label marked net content character height of less than 4mm, does not meet GB 7718-2011 "National Standards for Food Safety Prepackaged Food Labeling General Principles" standard requirements).
inspection agency for the national light industrial food quality supervision and testing Tianjin station.
(ii) The label "Hamburg Bread Embryo" produced by Tianjin Xiangerma Food Co., Ltd. is not qualified (the energy content in the nutritional content table as a percentage of the nutrient reference value (NRV) is miscalculated.
does not meet the standard requirements of GB 28050-2011 National Standards for Food Safety Prepackaged Food Nutrition Labeling General Principles).
inspection institutions are the product quality supervision and inspection institutes in Wuqing District of Tianjin.
(3) The label of "sauce tofu" produced by the old man's bean products factory in Yanxian County, Tianjin, is not qualified (the defystant in the ingredients table does not indicate the universal name).
does not meet the standard requirements of GB 7718-2011 National Standards for Food Safety Prepackaged Food Labeling General Principles).
inspection institutions for the Tianjin Food Safety Testing Technology Research Institute.
(4) Tianjin Pengshunyuan Food Co., Ltd. produced the "Yuding grilled ridge meat" label is not qualified (label labeled edible glucose, sodium caramelate, D-iso-asseptic acid sodium and other ten ingredients do not conform to the raw materials specified in the product standards;
does not meet the standard requirements of GB 7718-2011 National Standards for Food Safety Prepackaged Food Labeling General Principles).
inspection agency for the national light industrial food quality supervision and testing Tianjin station.
(5) Tianjin Kaier Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd. produced the "red date black rice purple potato powder" label is not qualified (the implementation of product standards have expired.
does not meet the standard requirements of GB 7718-2011 National Standards for Food Safety Prepackaged Food Labeling General Principles).
inspection agency is the Food Quality Supervision and Inspection Testing Center (Tianjin) of the China Federation of Commerce.
(6) Tianjin Sida Zeyi Biotech Co., Ltd. produced "pork cream" label is not qualified (the label is not labeled with "food flavor"; the ingredients "nucleotides" do not belong to GB2760-2014, food additives product quality specifications standards and the national authorities approved the use of food additives in the name;
does not meet the standard requirements of GB29924-2013 National Standards for Food Safety Food Additives Labeling.
inspection institutions for the Tianjin Food Safety Testing Technology Research Institute.
(7) Tianjin Hongxingyuan Food Co., Ltd. produced "pork flavor" label is not qualified (the label is not labeled "food flavor" words.
does not meet the standard requirements of GB29924-2013 "National Standards for Food Safety Food Additives Labeling").
inspection institutions for the Tianjin Food Safety Testing Technology Research Institute.
(viii) Tianjin Xiangyuan fragrance and fragrance factory production of "flavor powder flavor" label is not qualified (the label is not labeled with the word "food flavor"; the production date is the form of affling; the implementation of standard QB/T2640-2014 is not an effective domestic standard).
does not meet the standard requirements of GB29924-2013 "National Standards for Food Safety Food Additives Labeling").
inspection institutions for the Tianjin Food Safety Testing Technology Research Institute.
3. For the non-conforming products found in the above-mentioned sampling, the Tianjin Municipal Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission requires the inspection and disposal department to urge enterprises to identify the batch, quantity and cause of unqualified products, to take measures such as recalling unqualified products, to control risks, and to investigate and punish them in accordance with the law.
shall be reported to the Municipal Market Supervision Commission and published to the public within 3 months from the date of the issuance of the circular.
he heeds this notice.
annex .rar:1. This inspection item 2. Sugar supervision sampling qualified product information 3. Sugar supervision sampling unqualified product information 4. Pastry supervision sampling qualified product information 5. Pastry supervision sampling qualified product information 6. Soybean products supervision sampling qualified product information 7. Soy products supervision sampling unqualified product information 8. Meat products supervision sampling qualified product information 10. Convenient food supervision sampling unqualified product information 12. Food additives supervision sampling qualified product information 13. Food additives supervision sampling non-conforming product information 14. Frozen food supervision sampling qualified product information 15. Frozen beverage supervision sampling qualified product information 16. Edible oil, grease and its products supervision sampling qualified product information 17. Food processing products supervision sampling qualified product information 18. Starch and starch products supervision sampling qualified product information 19. Tea and related products supervision sampling qualified product information 20. Bee product supervision sampling qualified product information October 15, 2018 (this active disclosure)