-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
According to reports, small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a common disease, with a population prevalence of 53 per 100,000 in a large study
In the United States, a specific SFN ICD-10 diagnostic code (G628) has only recently been provided (October 2015)
Diagnostic screening
Most of the early studies of SFN alone or in combination did not include longitudinal results, detailed neurological examination, or exclude patients who developed large fiber involvement
A study used the SF-36 questionnaire to check the quality of life and found that the physical function scores were significantly worse at the time of evaluation
In this way, Stephen A Johnson of the Mayo Clinic and others evaluated the incidence and prevalence of SFN patients without large fiber involvement (pure) at the time of onset, and longitudinally evaluated the patients’ comorbidities and cumulative nervous system from a population perspective.
They compared test-confirmed SFN patients in Olmsted, Minnesota and neighboring counties with a matched control group (January 1, 1998-December 31, 2017) 3:1
A total of 94 SFN patients were found, with an incidence rate of 1.
diabetes
Compared with the control group (median 3, range 1-9), Charlson had more comorbidities (median 6, range 3-9), P<0.
Myocardial infarction
17 people developed foot ulcers, 71% of them had DM
36% of people developed large fiber neuropathy, an average of 5.
The median neuropathy impairment score (NIS) at onset is 2 (range 0 to 8), and the change/year is +1.
The proportion of SFN patients who died due to symptom onset was higher, 19%, compared with 12% in the control group, P<0.
The important significance of this study lies in the discovery: Isolated SFN is not common, but the incidence is increasing
Isolated SFN is not common, but the incidence is increasing
Leave a message here