-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
"Laolai" did not repay his debts.
After repeated efforts by the Longjing City Court's enforcement judge, he reached a repayment agreement with the applicant for enforcement.
Later, "Laolai" broke his promise and refused to repay the debt.
Seeing that the judge decided to impose judicial detention on him
.
Recently, the Executive Bureau of Longjing City People's Court successfully concluded a case using judicial detention.
"Lao Lai" quickly repaid the 5,400 yuan of pesticide money owed to the plaintiff
.
It is understood that in July 2009, the defendant Qin purchased two pesticides on credit from the plaintiff’s production materials company, valued at 17,600 yuan.
Part of the pesticide payment was 12,200 yuan, and the pesticide payment still owed 5,400 yuan.
The plaintiff repeatedly asked for it.
The defendant still defaulted on various reasons, so the original complaint went to the court
.
The court ordered the defendant Qin to repay 5,400 yuan for the pesticide immediately.
However, after the judgment took effect, Qin has not fulfilled the obligation of repayment, and the plaintiff applied for enforcement on June 30, 2014
.
After the case entered the enforcement procedure, the enforcement judge Wu Yunfeng learned that the person being enforced, Qin, was from Dunhua.
In recent years, he had contracted apple pear trees in Longjing to sell pears to make ends meet, but he did not inquire about Qin’s property available for enforcement.
The execution applicant also failed to provide clues about Qin's property and whereabouts, and the court terminated the execution procedure according to law
.
In October 2016, the execution applicant provided clues to the court about the whereabouts of the executor Qin.
Through multiple searches by the execution judge, the executor Qin was finally found in the place where the pears were sold
.
At first, Qin was lucky, claiming that he was currently in financial difficulties and had no ability to perform.
After the execution judge patiently explained the law, he agreed to send the money to the court the next day
.
However, the enforced Qin did not keep his word and did not pay the money in the court.
The enforcement judge visited the defendant's home for many times to communicate and negotiate.
Qin still refused to cooperate, which meant that he refused to insist
.
Because Qin had property and refused to perform the effective legal judgment of the people’s court, the court’s executive bureau decided to impose judicial detention on Qin in accordance with the law.
When Qin was taken to the court, he suddenly realized the seriousness of the matter, and Qin’s attitude happened 180 Du Changchang repeatedly stated that he had recognized his mistakes and asked the enforcement judge to give him a chance, and took the initiative to deposit 5,400 yuan for the enforcement case into the special case fund account
.
After repeated efforts by the Longjing City Court's enforcement judge, he reached a repayment agreement with the applicant for enforcement.
Later, "Laolai" broke his promise and refused to repay the debt.
Seeing that the judge decided to impose judicial detention on him
.
Recently, the Executive Bureau of Longjing City People's Court successfully concluded a case using judicial detention.
"Lao Lai" quickly repaid the 5,400 yuan of pesticide money owed to the plaintiff
.
It is understood that in July 2009, the defendant Qin purchased two pesticides on credit from the plaintiff’s production materials company, valued at 17,600 yuan.
Part of the pesticide payment was 12,200 yuan, and the pesticide payment still owed 5,400 yuan.
The plaintiff repeatedly asked for it.
The defendant still defaulted on various reasons, so the original complaint went to the court
.
The court ordered the defendant Qin to repay 5,400 yuan for the pesticide immediately.
However, after the judgment took effect, Qin has not fulfilled the obligation of repayment, and the plaintiff applied for enforcement on June 30, 2014
.
After the case entered the enforcement procedure, the enforcement judge Wu Yunfeng learned that the person being enforced, Qin, was from Dunhua.
In recent years, he had contracted apple pear trees in Longjing to sell pears to make ends meet, but he did not inquire about Qin’s property available for enforcement.
The execution applicant also failed to provide clues about Qin's property and whereabouts, and the court terminated the execution procedure according to law
.
In October 2016, the execution applicant provided clues to the court about the whereabouts of the executor Qin.
Through multiple searches by the execution judge, the executor Qin was finally found in the place where the pears were sold
.
At first, Qin was lucky, claiming that he was currently in financial difficulties and had no ability to perform.
After the execution judge patiently explained the law, he agreed to send the money to the court the next day
.
However, the enforced Qin did not keep his word and did not pay the money in the court.
The enforcement judge visited the defendant's home for many times to communicate and negotiate.
Qin still refused to cooperate, which meant that he refused to insist
.
Because Qin had property and refused to perform the effective legal judgment of the people’s court, the court’s executive bureau decided to impose judicial detention on Qin in accordance with the law.
When Qin was taken to the court, he suddenly realized the seriousness of the matter, and Qin’s attitude happened 180 Du Changchang repeatedly stated that he had recognized his mistakes and asked the enforcement judge to give him a chance, and took the initiative to deposit 5,400 yuan for the enforcement case into the special case fund account
.