echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Blood System > Lancet oncol: Comparison of the efficacy of kafazomi with boronitzomi in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

    Lancet oncol: Comparison of the efficacy of kafazomi with boronitzomi in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

    • Last Update: 2020-10-03
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Boronitazome, loramine and dexamison (VRd) are standard treatments for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    second-generation protease inhibitor kafezometham and KRd have shown promising results in Phase 2 trials and may further improve efficacy compared to VRd.
    this study is intended to assess whether the KRd option is superior to the VRd option for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who do not consider immediate self-stem cell transplantation (ASCT).
    trial was a multicenter, open-label Phase 3 randomized controlled trial that recruited newly diagnosed patients over the age of 18 with multiple myeloma who were unsuitable or did not intend to perform ASCT directly, randomly assigned to the KRd or VRd group at 1:1 for 36 weeks of treatment.
    end point of the induction phase is the progress-free survival and the overall survival of the maintenance phase.
    December 6, 2013 - December 6, 2019, a total of 1,087 patients (542 in the VRd group and 545 in the KRd group) were recruited.
    followed for 9 months (IQR 5-23), and at the time of the second interim analysis, the medium progress-free survival periods of the KRd and VRd groups were 34.6 months (95% CI 28.8-37.8) and 34.4 months (30.1-failed; 95% CI 0.83-1.31; p=0.74).
    survival of the two groups was not reached.
    the most common non-haematological adverse reactions associated with level 3-4 treatment were fatigue (VRd 6% vs KRd 6%), hyperglycemia (4% vs 6%), diarrhea (5% vs 3%), peripheral neuropathy (8% vs vs. 1%), breathing difficulties (2% vs 7%) and thrombosis events (2% vs 5%).
    2 and 11 treatment-related deaths were reported in the VRd group and the KRd group, respectively.
    the KRd programme failed to extend the progression-free survival of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma and had more toxic side effects than the VRd programme.
    VRd triple program remains the standard induction program for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with standard risk and moderate risk, and is the appropriate foundation for the development of a four-drug joint.
    .
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.