Jiangsu 1.97 billion topped the list! National environmental administrative penalties amounted to 13.6 billion yuan in the first 11 months

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">On December 25, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment notified the implementation of environmental administrative penalty cases and supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">On December 25, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment notified the implementation of environmental administrative penalty cases and supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">On December 25, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment notified the implementation of environmental administrative penalty cases and supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018:

On December 25, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment notified the implementation of environmental administrative penalty cases and supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">National Environmental Administrative Penalty Cases

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Total penalty decision issued 166,210 copies

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscated was 13.
597 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide is 36,302

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">1.
78% increase over the same period last year

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">National Environmental Administrative Penalty Cases

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Total penalty decision issued 166,210 copies

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscated was 13.
597 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide is 36,302

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">1.
78% increase over the same period last year

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">National Environmental Administrative Penalty Cases

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Total penalty decision issued 166,210 copies

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscated was 13.
597 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide is 36,302

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">1.
78% increase over the same period last year

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">National Environmental Administrative Penalty Cases

National Environmental Administrative Penalty Cases

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Total penalty decision issued 166,210 copies

Total penalty decision issued 166,210 copies 166,210 copies

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscated was 13.
597 billion yuan

The amount of fines and confiscated was 13.
597 billion yuan and 13.
597 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide is 36,302

The total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide is 36302 36302

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">1.
78% increase over the same period last year

An increase of 1.
78% 1.
78% over the same period last year

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The provinces with greater administrative penalties are: Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hebei, Shandong, and Zhejiang.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The provinces with greater administrative penalties are: Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hebei, Shandong, and Zhejiang.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The provinces with greater administrative penalties are: Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hebei, Shandong, and Zhejiang.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The provinces with greater administrative penalties are: Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hebei, Shandong, and Zhejiang.

The provinces with greater administrative penalties are: Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hebei, Shandong, and Zhejiang.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Jiangsu (1.
973 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangdong (1.
537 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Hebei (1.
253 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Shandong (1.
025 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscations in the above four provinces exceeded 1 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Jiangsu (1.
973 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangdong (1.
537 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Hebei (1.
253 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Shandong (1.
025 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscations in the above four provinces exceeded 1 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Jiangsu (1.
973 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangdong (1.
537 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Hebei (1.
253 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Shandong (1.
025 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscations in the above four provinces exceeded 1 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Jiangsu (1.
973 billion yuan)

Jiangsu (1.
973 billion yuan) Jiangsu (1.
973 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangdong (1.
537 billion yuan)

Guangdong (1.
537 billion yuan) Guangdong (1.
537 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Hebei (1.
253 billion yuan)

Hebei (1.
253 billion yuan) Hebei (1.
253 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Shandong (1.
025 billion yuan)

Shandong (1.
025 billion yuan) Shandong (1.
025 billion yuan)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of fines and confiscations in the above four provinces exceeded 1 billion yuan

The amount of fines and confiscated in the above four provinces exceeded 1 billion yuan and the amount of fines and confiscated in the above four provinces exceeded 1 billion yuan

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by region

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by region

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by region

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by region

Divide by region Divide by region

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment cases top ten of cities as:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangzhou, Shijiazhuang, Dongguan, Suzhou, Shenzhen, Handan, Weifang, Chengdu, Foshan, Wuxi

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment cases top ten of cities as:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangzhou, Shijiazhuang, Dongguan, Suzhou, Shenzhen, Handan, Weifang, Chengdu, Foshan, Wuxi

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment cases top ten of cities as:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangzhou, Shijiazhuang, Dongguan, Suzhou, Shenzhen, Handan, Weifang, Chengdu, Foshan, Wuxi

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment cases top ten of cities as:

The number of administrative punishment cases top ten of cities as:
the number of administrative punishment cases top ten the number of administrative punishment cases top ten cities cities

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Guangzhou, Shijiazhuang, Dongguan, Suzhou, Shenzhen, Handan, Weifang, Chengdu, Foshan, Wuxi

Guangzhou, Shijiazhuang, Dongguan, Suzhou, Shenzhen, Handan, Weifang, Chengdu, Foshan, Wuxi

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of cities as:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan City, Suzhou City, Shenzhen City, Wuxi City, Guangzhou City, Nantong City, Xuzhou City, Dongguan City, Shijiazhuang City, Foshan City

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of cities as:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan City, Suzhou City, Shenzhen City, Wuxi City, Guangzhou City, Nantong City, Xuzhou City, Dongguan City, Shijiazhuang City, Foshan City

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of cities as:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan City, Suzhou City, Shenzhen City, Wuxi City, Guangzhou City, Nantong City, Xuzhou City, Dongguan City, Shijiazhuang City, Foshan City

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of cities as:

The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of cities as: administrative penalties amount of the top ten the amount of the administrative penalty of the top ten cities cities

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan City, Suzhou City, Shenzhen City, Wuxi City, Guangzhou City, Nantong City, Xuzhou City, Dongguan City, Shijiazhuang City, Foshan City

Tangshan City, Suzhou City, Shenzhen City, Wuxi City, Guangzhou City, Nantong City, Xuzhou City, Dongguan City, Shijiazhuang City, Foshan City

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment case, the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Baiyun District of Guangzhou, Shunde District of Foshan, Shouguang City of Weifang, Wuqing District of Tianjin, Zengcheng District of Guangzhou, Jiangyin City of Wuxi, Daxing District of Beijing, Wujiang District of Suzhou, Bao'an District of Shenzhen, Fangshan District of Beijing;

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan Qian’an City, Shenzhen Bao’an District, Foshan Shunde District, Wuxi Jiangyin City, Shanghai Chongming District, Zibo Linzi District, Changzhou Wujin District, Taizhou Taixing City, Suzhou Kunshan City, Guangzhou Zengcheng District.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment case, the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Baiyun District of Guangzhou, Shunde District of Foshan, Shouguang City of Weifang, Wuqing District of Tianjin, Zengcheng District of Guangzhou, Jiangyin City of Wuxi, Daxing District of Beijing, Wujiang District of Suzhou, Bao'an District of Shenzhen, Fangshan District of Beijing;

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan Qian’an City, Shenzhen Bao’an District, Foshan Shunde District, Wuxi Jiangyin City, Shanghai Chongming District, Zibo Linzi District, Changzhou Wujin District, Taizhou Taixing City, Suzhou Kunshan City, Guangzhou Zengcheng District.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment case, the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Baiyun District of Guangzhou, Shunde District of Foshan, Shouguang City of Weifang, Wuqing District of Tianjin, Zengcheng District of Guangzhou, Jiangyin City of Wuxi, Daxing District of Beijing, Wujiang District of Suzhou, Bao'an District of Shenzhen, Fangshan District of Beijing;

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan Qian’an City, Shenzhen Bao’an District, Foshan Shunde District, Wuxi Jiangyin City, Shanghai Chongming District, Zibo Linzi District, Changzhou Wujin District, Taizhou Taixing City, Suzhou Kunshan City, Guangzhou Zengcheng District.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The number of administrative punishment case, the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

The number of administrative punishment case, the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) are: the number of administrative punishment cases top ten the number of administrative punishment cases top ten counties (cities, districts) counties (cities, districts)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Baiyun District of Guangzhou, Shunde District of Foshan, Shouguang City of Weifang, Wuqing District of Tianjin, Zengcheng District of Guangzhou, Jiangyin City of Wuxi, Daxing District of Beijing, Wujiang District of Suzhou, Bao'an District of Shenzhen, Fangshan District of Beijing;

Baiyun District of Guangzhou, Shunde District of Foshan, Shouguang City of Weifang, Wuqing District of Tianjin, Zengcheng District of Guangzhou, Jiangyin City of Wuxi, Daxing District of Beijing, Wujiang District of Suzhou, Bao'an District of Shenzhen, Fangshan District of Beijing;

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) as follows:

The amount of administrative penalties for the top ten of the counties (cities, districts) to: the amount of the top ten administrative penalties amount of administrative punishment of the top ten counties (cities, districts) counties (cities, districts)

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Tangshan Qian’an City, Shenzhen Bao’an District, Foshan Shunde District, Wuxi Jiangyin City, Shanghai Chongming District, Zibo Linzi District, Changzhou Wujin District, Taizhou Taixing City, Suzhou Kunshan City, Guangzhou Zengcheng District.

Tangshan Qian’an City, Shenzhen Bao’an District, Foshan Shunde District, Wuxi Jiangyin City, Shanghai Chongming District, Zibo Linzi District, Changzhou Wujin District, Taizhou Taixing City, Suzhou Kunshan City, Guangzhou Zengcheng District.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by type

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by type

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by type

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by type

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">Divided by type

Divided by type Divided by type

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">From January to November, the total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide was 36,302 , an increase of 1.
78% over the same period last year (35,667) .

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">among them,

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">691 consecutive cases were punished on a daily basis , a decrease of 33.
94% compared with the same period last year (1046), and the amount of fines was 985 million yuan, which was a decrease of 8.
41% compared with the same period last year (1.
075 billion yuan);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">19,903 cases of seizures and seizures , an increase of 21.
15% over the same period last year (16,429);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">There were 6196 cases of production restriction and production suspension , a decrease of 20.
99% compared with the same period last year (7842);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">7,145 cases of administrative detention were transferred , a decrease of 8.
71% compared with the same period last year (7827);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">2367 cases of suspected environmental pollution crimes were transferred , a decrease of 6.
18% compared with the same period last year (2523).

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">From January to November, the total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide was 36,302 , an increase of 1.
78% over the same period last year (35,667) .

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">among them,

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">691 consecutive cases were punished on a daily basis , a decrease of 33.
94% compared with the same period last year (1046), and the amount of fines was 985 million yuan, which was a decrease of 8.
41% compared with the same period last year (1.
075 billion yuan);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">19,903 cases of seizures and seizures , an increase of 21.
15% over the same period last year (16,429);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">There were 6196 cases of production restriction and production suspension , a decrease of 20.
99% compared with the same period last year (7842);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">7,145 cases of administrative detention were transferred , a decrease of 8.
71% compared with the same period last year (7827);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">2367 cases of suspected environmental pollution crimes were transferred , a decrease of 6.
18% compared with the same period last year (2523).

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">From January to November, the total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide was 36,302 , an increase of 1.
78% over the same period last year (35,667) .

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">among them,

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">691 consecutive cases were punished on a daily basis , a decrease of 33.
94% compared with the same period last year (1046), and the amount of fines was 985 million yuan, which was a decrease of 8.
41% compared with the same period last year (1.

075 billion yuan);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">19,903 cases of seizures and seizures , an increase of 21.

15% over the same period last year (16,429);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">There were 6196 cases of production restriction and production suspension , a decrease of 20.
99% compared with the same period last year (7842);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">7,145 cases of administrative detention were transferred , a decrease of 8.
71% compared with the same period last year (7827);

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">2367 cases of suspected environmental pollution crimes were transferred , a decrease of 6.
18% compared with the same period last year (2523).

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">From January to November, the total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide was 36,302 , an increase of 1.
78% over the same period last year (35,667) .

From January to November, the total number of five types of cases implemented nationwide was 36,302 , an increase of 1.
78% over the same period last year (35,667) .
36302 cases 36302 cases increased by 1.
78% increased by 1.
78%

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">among them,

among them,

75em; word-wrap: break-word ;">691 consecutive cases were punished on a daily basis , a decrease of 33.
94% compared with the same period last year (1046), and the amount of fines was 985 million yuan, which was a decrease of 8.
41% compared with the same period last year (1.

075 billion yuan);

Consecutive daily penalty cases 691, (1046) 33.
94% decrease over last year, fines 985 million yuan, 8.

Seizure, detention cases 19,903, an increase of 21.

Production restriction and production suspension cases were 6196, a decrease of 20.

Transferred to administrative detention 7145, down by 8.

2367 cases of suspected environmental pollution crimes were transferred , a decrease of 6.

75em; word-wrap: break-word ; text-align: center;">Regional distribution table of the implementation of supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018

75em; word-wrap: break-word ; text-align: center;">Regional distribution table of the implementation of supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018

75em; word-wrap: break-word ; text-align: center;">Regional distribution table of the implementation of supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018

75em; word-wrap: break-word ; text-align: center;">Regional distribution table of the implementation of supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law from January to November 2018

Regional distribution of the implementation of supporting measures of the Environmental Protection Law 544px; line-height: 22.

4px; text-align: center; widows: 1; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: , SimSun; font-size: 18px;">from January to November 2018 Table of the 544px; line-height: 22.
4px; text-align: center; widows: 1; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: , SimSun; font-size: 18px;">number of general administrative penalty cases and the amount of fines from January to November 2018544px; line-height: 22.
4px; text-align: center; widows: 1; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);'>544px; line-height: 22.
4px; text-align: center; widows: 1; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);'>