-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Recently, researchers compared the effects of ventral or dorsal surgical approaches on postoperative physical function of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Recently, researchers compared the effects of ventral or dorsal surgical approaches on postoperative physical function of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
There was no significant difference in the average improvement of SF-36 PCS after 1 year in the ventral surgical approach group (5.
9 points) and the dorsal surgical approach group (6.
2 points).
The ventral surgical approach group (5.
9 points) and the dorsal surgical approach group (6.
2 points) There was no significant difference in the average improvement of SF-36 PCS after 1 year.
The complication rate of the ventral and dorsal surgical approach group was 48% and 24% , respectively.
48% and 24% of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who require cervical spine surgery, the ventral and dorsal surgical approaches have no significant effect on the patient’s body function at 1 year after surgery, but the dorsal surgical approach is complicated Significantly lower risk of disease.
For patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who need cervical surgery, the ventral and dorsal surgical approaches have no significant impact on the patient’s body function at 1 year after surgery, but the dorsal surgical approach has complications Significantly lower risk Original Source com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2777236" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Leave a message here
Recently, researchers compared the effects of ventral or dorsal surgical approaches on postoperative physical function of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
There was no significant difference in the average improvement of SF-36 PCS after 1 year in the ventral surgical approach group (5.
9 points) and the dorsal surgical approach group (6.
2 points).
The ventral surgical approach group (5.
9 points) and the dorsal surgical approach group (6.
2 points) There was no significant difference in the average improvement of SF-36 PCS after 1 year.
The complication rate of the ventral and dorsal surgical approach group was 48% and 24% , respectively.
48% and 24% of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who require cervical spine surgery, the ventral and dorsal surgical approaches have no significant effect on the patient’s body function at 1 year after surgery, but the dorsal surgical approach is complicated Significantly lower risk of disease.
For patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who need cervical surgery, the ventral and dorsal surgical approaches have no significant impact on the patient’s body function at 1 year after surgery, but the dorsal surgical approach has complications Significantly lower risk Original Source com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2777236" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Leave a message here
