echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Immunology News > J Rheumatol: Comparison of low-field magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and clinical outcomes of psoriasis arthritis

    J Rheumatol: Comparison of low-field magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and clinical outcomes of psoriasis arthritis

    • Last Update: 2020-06-05
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Inflammation Control Trials (TICOPA; isrctn.com: ISRCTN30147736) compared standard treatment (StdC) for early psoriasis arthritis (PSA) with strict control (TC) and showed that TC outcomes betterThis sub-study assessed the performance indicators of modern imaging results and compared them with clinical dataassessed non-comparative 0.2T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; one-handed) using a combined overall inflammation score of the Rheumatology Outcomes (OMERACT) PsA MRI Scoring System (PsAMRIS)These scores are scored and added to ultrasound (US; the same hand) grayscale, power Doppler, and erosion of the palm knuckles (MCP) and near-side knuckles (PIP)78 patients had paired US data (baseline and 48 weeks), 61 patients had paired MRI data, and 50 had matching clinical, MR, and US dataAt MCP levels, there were significant intra-group changes in the inflammatory PsAMRIS components: MRI overall inflammation (median difference (range), standardized response average (SRM): TC and StdC were 3.25 (-5.0 to 12.0), 0.68; 1.0 (-4.5 to 17.5), 0.45The differences in the US group are similar: TC and StdC are 1.0 (-13.0 to 23.0), 0.45; 3.0 (-6.0 to 21.0), 0.77There were no differences between treatment groupsThe study found a significant correlation between baseline and changes in MRI and US scoresThere was a significant correlation between the baseline PsA disease activity score and the overall INFLAMMATION score of MRI (MCP, PIP's Spearman, respectively: 0.46, 0.63)There is no difference in the progress of erosionPsAMRIS and US inflammation scores showed good reactivenessNo intergroup differences were found, but the sub-study may not be sufficient to determine the difference between the two treatment strategies
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.