 Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Int J Urol: Which is better between percutaneous ablation and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1a renal tumors?

Int J Urol: Which is better between percutaneous ablation and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1a renal tumors?

 Last Update: 2022-01-23
 Source: Internet
 Author: User

Tags

strogens disease

kidney stone ablation

Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

Currently, detected RCCs are getting smaller in size, leading to increasing adoption of minimally invasive PN as the preferred treatment for T1 RCC

The use of local tumor ablation is increasing in the treatment of small kidney masses

Researchers from Italy published an article in the journal Int J Urol comparing oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy and local tumor ablation in patients with T1 kidney masses .

To reduce intrinsic differences between patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (n = 405) and local tumor ablation (n = 137), we used a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis

Multivariate logistic regression and competing risks regression models were used to identify predictors of complications, recurrence, and death from other causes, respectively Multivariate logistic regression and competing risks regression models were used to identify predictors of complications, recurrence, and death from other causes, respectively

RESULTS: Partial nephrectomy was associated with higher disease-free survival compared with local tumor ablation (92.

In competing risks analysis, age (hazard ratio 0.

Multivariate regression analysis

In conclusion, compared with partial nephrectomy, local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence and lower risk of complications, with comparable overall survival

Local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence and lower risk of complications compared with partial nephrectomy , with comparable overall survival rates Local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence compared with partial nephrectomy and lower risk of complications, comparable overall survival

Original source:

Lorenzo Bianchi, Francesco Chessa, Pietro Piazza et al.

Percutaneous ablation or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for cT1a renal masses? A propensity score-matched analysis

Leave a message here

This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.