echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Int J Urol: Which is better between percutaneous ablation and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1a renal tumors?

    Int J Urol: Which is better between percutaneous ablation and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1a renal tumors?

    • Last Update: 2022-01-23
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Currently, detected RCCs are getting smaller in size, leading to increasing adoption of minimally invasive PN as the preferred treatment for T1 RCC


    The use of local tumor ablation is increasing in the treatment of small kidney masses


    Researchers from Italy published an article in the journal Int J Urol comparing oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy and local tumor ablation in patients with T1 kidney masses .


    To reduce intrinsic differences between patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (n = 405) and local tumor ablation (n = 137), we used a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis


    Multivariate logistic regression and competing risks regression models were used to identify predictors of complications, recurrence, and death from other causes, respectively Multivariate logistic regression and competing risks regression models were used to identify predictors of complications, recurrence, and death from other causes, respectively

    RESULTS: Partial nephrectomy was associated with higher disease-free survival compared with local tumor ablation (92.


    In competing risks analysis, age (hazard ratio 0.


    Multivariate regression analysis

    Multivariate regression analysis

     

    In conclusion, compared with partial nephrectomy, local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence and lower risk of complications, with comparable overall survival


    Local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence and lower risk of complications compared with partial nephrectomy , with comparable overall survival rates Local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence compared with partial nephrectomy and lower risk of complications, comparable overall survival

     

    Original source:

    Original source:

    Lorenzo Bianchi, Francesco Chessa, Pietro Piazza et al.


    Percutaneous ablation or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for cT1a renal masses? A propensity score-matched analysis

    Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.