echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Feed Industry News > Genetically modified feed feed pigs, China-Australia test conclusions are the opposite

    Genetically modified feed feed pigs, China-Australia test conclusions are the opposite

    • Last Update: 2020-07-01
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Introduction:Recently, 61 academicians of the Chinese mainland requested the industrialization of gm rice, based on the 90-day pig feeding test made with genetically modified rice by China Agricultural University showing that GM rice was not found to be a problemBut in June 2013, Australian scientists extended the time it took to feed pigs from genetically modified to 159 days, and found that males had 400 per cent more severe gastritis than those fed traditional feeds, with an average 25 per cent increase in the weight of the uterus47Jmainland expert study: pig "test eating" genetically modified rice test safety47JAccording to the Beijing News, recently, Huang Kunlun, professor of the School of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering of China Agricultural University, said that 90 days of small pig feeding tests showthat transgene BT anti-worm rice and non-gMO rice have the same nutrition and safety for pigs47J
    Why use pigs for testing? Huang Kunlun, an expert on genetically modified rice at the Agricultural University of China, who led the experiment, explained that in terms of nutrition and toxicology, the digestive process of the gastrointestinal tract in pigs is very similar to that of humans and can be used to study the dynamics of drugs in the body, and their physiology and omnivores are similar to humans, which also contribute to nutrition researchTherefore, the use of pigs to do the test can be a greater reflection of the safety of genetically modified rice for human consumption47J
    "The experimental pig was fed for 90 days without poisoning or death, smooth fur, flexible movement, normal diet, and good growth and developmentHuang Kunlun said47J
      The findings of the experiment have been widely questioned by the Chinese mainland public Some people directly disclose, why only 90 days of testing? Why don't you do it a little longer? It's because it's a long time, it's a problem 47J
      Another public questioned, the test of pigs 90 days without poisoning or death, can prove that GM rice is safe? Genetically modified rice is not a strong poison, the toxic properties are revealed so soon? 47J
      There are people said that the people who do the experiment itself is the study of genetically modified, both athletes, but also referees, such a test can have credibility? 47J
      Another people joked that pigs can try to eat 3 months on behalf of genetically modified rice safety, can only say that either the Ministry of Agriculture to the people's IQ thought too low, or the Ministry of Agriculture's IQ is too low 47J Western scientists: Genetically modified feed affects pig health 47J just four months ago, the same pig for genetically modified feed test, Australian scientists have come to a different conclusion from mainland experts 47J
      A new study in June, conducted in collaboration with Australian and US researchers, found that pigs fed from genetically modified feed had a much higher incidence of gastritis than those fed on conventional feed, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported 47J
      The study's lead researcher was Judy Carman, dean of the Adelaide School of Health and Environmental Research, epidemiologist and biochemist The researchers studied 168 weaned piglets in a commercial pig farm in the United States for 22.7 weeks (159 days) 47J
      They fed half of the piglets with GENETICally modified soybeans and corn from commercial suppliers, and 84 of them were fed on the same amount of non-GMO feed, and both pigs were fed in the same environment and conditions 47J
      Five months later, they slaughtered the pigs and were dissected by two veterinarians The two veterinarians did not know which pigs were fed from genetically modified feed and which were not 47J
      The two groups of pigs were no different in terms of food intake, weight gain, mortality and routine biochemical measurements of blood, but there were differences in the stomach and uterus, the researchers said 47J
      Pigs fed genetically modified feed were much more likely to develop severe gastritis, at 32% to 12%, and the difference was more pronounced in male pigs, where the prevalence of gm feed-fed male pigs was four times higher than that of non-GMO-fed males and 2.2 times that of female pigs The uterine weight of female pigs fed by genetically modified feed is also 25% heavier than that of non-GMO feed-fed female pigs 47J
      For years, critics have pointed out that new proteins built by DNA transformations in genetically modified plants can cause digestive problems in animals and may cause the same problems in humans Proponents of GM have so far failed to provide data on a trial that fed experimental animals with GENETICally modified foods for more than four months 47J
    Share it on the feed's twitter feed
    document.getElementById ("bdshell_js") src .""""""""New Date(new Date.)/3600000); Introduction: recently, 61 academicians of the Chinese mainland requested the industrialization of GM rice, based on the 90-day pig feeding test made with genetically modified rice by the Agricultural University of China showing that GM rice was not found But in June 2013, Australian scientists extended the time it took to feed pigs from genetically modified to 159 days, and found that males had 400 per cent more severe gastritis than those fed traditional feeds, with an average 25 per cent increase in the weight of the uterus 47J mainland expert study: pig "test eating" genetically modified rice test safety 47J According to the Beijing News, recently, Huang Kunlun, professor of the School of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering of China Agricultural University, said that 90 days of small pig feeding tests showthat transgene BT anti-worm rice and non-gMO rice have the same nutrition and safety for pigs 47J
      Why use pigs for testing? Huang Kunlun, an expert on genetically modified rice at the Agricultural University of China, who led the experiment, explained that in terms of nutrition and toxicology, the digestive process of the gastrointestinal tract in pigs is very similar to that of humans and can be used to study the dynamics of drugs in the body, and their physiology and omnivores are similar to humans, which also contribute to nutrition research Therefore, the use of pigs to do the test can be a greater reflection of the safety of genetically modified rice for human consumption 47J
      "The experimental pig was fed for 90 days without poisoning or death, smooth fur, flexible movement, normal diet, and good growth and development Huang Kunlun said 47J
      The findings of the experiment have been widely questioned by the Chinese mainland public Some people directly disclose, why only 90 days of testing? Why don't you do it a little longer? It's because it's a long time, it's a problem 47J
      Another public questioned, the test of pigs 90 days without poisoning or death, can prove that GM rice is safe? Genetically modified rice is not a strong poison, the toxic properties are revealed so soon? 47J
      There are people said that the people who do the experiment itself is the study of genetically modified, both athletes, but also referees, such a test can have credibility? 47J
      Another people joked that pigs can try to eat 3 months on behalf of genetically modified rice safety, can only say that either the Ministry of Agriculture to the people's IQ thought too low, or the Ministry of Agriculture's IQ is too low 47J Western scientists: Genetically modified feed affects pig health 47J just four months ago, the same pig for genetically modified feed test, Australian scientists have come to a different conclusion from mainland experts 47J
      A new study in June, conducted in collaboration with Australian and US researchers, found that pigs fed from genetically modified feed had a much higher incidence of gastritis than those fed on conventional feed, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported 47J
      The study's lead researcher was Judy Carman, dean of the Adelaide School of Health and Environmental Research, epidemiologist and biochemist The researchers studied 168 weaned piglets in a commercial pig farm in the United States for 22.7 weeks (159 days) 47J
      They fed half of the piglets with GENETICally modified soybeans and corn from commercial suppliers, and 84 of them were fed on the same amount of non-GMO feed, and both pigs were fed in the same environment and conditions 47J
      Five months later, they slaughtered the pigs and were dissected by two veterinarians The two veterinarians did not know which pigs were fed from genetically modified feed and which were not 47J
      The two groups of pigs were no different in terms of food intake, weight gain, mortality and routine biochemical measurements of blood, but there were differences in the stomach and uterus, the researchers said 47J
      Pigs fed genetically modified feed were much more likely to develop severe gastritis, at 32% to 12%, and the difference was more pronounced in male pigs, where the prevalence of gm feed-fed male pigs was four times higher than that of non-GMO-fed males and 2.2 times that of female pigs The uterine weight of female pigs fed by genetically modified feed is also 25% heavier than that of non-GMO feed-fed female pigs 47J
      For years, critics have pointed out that new proteins built by DNA transformations in genetically modified plants can cause digestive problems in animals and may cause the same problems in humans Proponents of GM have so far failed to provide data on a trial that fed experimental animals with GENETICally modified foods for more than four months 47J
    With "Gm, Feed, Feed Pigs, China-Australia Experiments, on the contrary" related article: recommended topics: News Click: Top Picture News: News Review List: Seven Mouths Forum:
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.