-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
The standard treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer is EGFR-TKI inhibitors
.
But it is inevitable that the problem of drug resistance
The standard treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer is EGFR-TKI inhibitors
The study included patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations who were treated in the hospital between March 2015 and March 2020
.
All patients received first-line or second-line treatment with EGFR-TKI, NGS analysis was performed after progression, and patients with EGFR mutations and MET amplification were subjected to final analysis
The study included patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations who were treated in the hospital between March 2015 and March 2020
A total of 70 patients were included in the study, of which 38 were treated with EGFR-TKI+crizotinib, 10 were treated with crizotinib alone, and 22 were treated with chemotherapy
Among the 38 patients who received EGFR-TKI and crizotinib combination therapy, only 35 patients could be evaluated for efficacy
Efficacy and prognosis
Efficacy and prognosisThe median real-world PFS (rwPFS) of patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib was compared with crizotinib monotherapy (5.
0 vs.
2.
3 months; p = 0.
007; HR = 0.
88, 95% CI (0.
42-2.
42) ), adjusted p = 0.
036) and chemotherapy (5.
0 vs.
2.
9 months; p = 0.
038; HR = 0.
72, 95% CI (0.
32, 2.
06), adjusted p = 0.
024) were significantly longer
.
However, the median OS of patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib was higher than that of crizotinib alone (10 vs.
The median real-world PFS (rwPFS) of patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib was compared with crizotinib monotherapy (5.
Patients with TP53 mutations, who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib (n = 17) for median rwPFS bicrizotinib monotherapy (n = 8) (6.
Prognosis with TP53 mutation
Prognosis with TP53 mutationThe median rwPFS of patients with EGFR amplification who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib (n = 13) was longer than that of crizotinib alone (5.
0 vs 1.
2 months, p = 0.
017, adjp = 0.
046), The median OS was also significantly longer (10.
0 vs.
3.
0 months, p = 0.
02, adjp = 0.
019)
.
Compared with chemotherapy (n = 12) treatment, median rwPFS (5.
The median rwPFS of patients with EGFR amplification who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib (n = 13) was longer than that of crizotinib alone (5.
Prognosis of combined EGFR amplification
Prognosis of combined EGFR amplificationPotential acquired resistance mechanisms after EGFR-TKI+crizotinib treatment include: EGFR-T790M (n= 2), EGFR- 1718q (n=1), EGFR-s645c (n=1), MET-D1228H ( n=1), BRAF-V600E(n=1), NRAS-Q61H(n=1), KRAS-amp(n=1), ERBB2-amp(n=1), CDK4-amp(n=1), MYC-amp (n=1)
.
.
The most common treatment-related toxicities are neutropenia (n = 16, 22.
9%) and fatigue (n = 13, 18.
6%)
.
In 38 patients treated with EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib, grade 1-2 neutropenia (n=5), grade 1-3 transaminase elevation (n=4), grade 1-2 vomiting (n=4), grade 1-2 diarrhea (n=4) and grade 1-3 rash (n=4) are the most common adverse reactions
.
Among the 10 patients who received crizotinib monotherapy, the most common adverse reactions were grade 1-2 vomiting (n = 3) and diarrhea (n = 2)
.
Among 22 patients who received chemotherapy, grade 1-3 neutropenia (n = 10) and fatigue (n = 8) were the most common adverse reactions
.
Six patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib (15.
8%) and three patients receiving chemotherapy (13.
6%) observed treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or above (p = 0.
591)
.
No adverse events of grade IV, fatal or unexpected were observed
.
9%) and fatigue (n = 13, 18.
6%)
.
In 38 patients treated with EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib, grade 1-2 neutropenia (n=5), grade 1-3 transaminase elevation (n=4), grade 1-2 vomiting (n=4), grade 1-2 diarrhea (n=4) and grade 1-3 rash (n=4) are the most common adverse reactions
.
Among the 10 patients who received crizotinib monotherapy, the most common adverse reactions were grade 1-2 vomiting (n = 3) and diarrhea (n = 2)
.
Among 22 patients who received chemotherapy, grade 1-3 neutropenia (n = 10) and fatigue (n = 8) were the most common adverse reactions
.
Six patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib (15.
8%) and three patients receiving chemotherapy (13.
6%) observed treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or above (p = 0.
591)
.
No adverse events of grade IV, fatal or unexpected were observed
.
Adverse reactions
Adverse reactionsIn summary, this real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment resistance
.
.
This real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment of drug resistance
.
This real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment of drug resistance
.
Original source:
Original source:Liu L, Qu J, Heng J, Zhou C, Xiong Y, Yang H, Jiang W, Zeng L, Zhu S, Zhang Y, Tan J, Hu C, Deng P and Yang N (2021) A Large Real-World Study on the Effectiveness of the Combined Inhibition of EGFR and MET in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Development of EGFR-TKI Resistance.
Front.
Oncol.
11:722039.
doi: 10.
3389/fonc.
2021.
722039
.
.
722039 doi:.
10.
3389 / fonc.
2021.
722039 in this message