Eating sugar is not the "culprit" of the high incidence of diabetes and obesity

Original: Eating sugar is not the "culprit" of diabetes and obesity

As the world's premier event in the field of diabetes scholarship, the ADA Congress (Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Society) has always been considered a bellwether

As the world's premier event in the field of diabetes scholarship, the ADA Congress (Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Society) has always been considered a bellwether

This year, two reports on artificial sweeteners have sparked heated discussions

"Artificial sweeteners not only do not reduce weight, but may also gain weight"? Maureen Chomko, from Neighborcare Health, was the first to speak out against artificial sweeteners

"Clinical studies shared by Chomko have shown that the intake of AS (artificial sweeteners), in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving a sample of 242 people, for a period of 6-24 months), did not reduce the body mass index (BMI), no weight loss effect .

"Clinical studies shared by Chomko have shown that the intake of AS (artificial sweeteners), in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving a sample of 242 people, for a period of 6-24 months), did not reduce the body mass index (BMI), no weight loss effect .

(AS: Artificial Sweetener)

(AS: Artificial Sweetener)

Richard Mattes of Purdue University affirmed safety and refuted some of the studies that the speakers had cited and did not cite, pointing out that these studies were insufficient in design or evidence, such as a study that concluded that AS gained weight, actually used sports drinks

Richard Mattes of Purdue University affirmed safety and refuted some of the studies that the speakers had cited and did not cite, pointing out that these studies were insufficient in design or evidence, such as a study that concluded that AS gained weight, actually used sports drinks

However, Richard Mattes also admitted that he accepted sponsorship from manufacturers

However, Richard Mattes also admitted that he accepted sponsorship from manufacturers

Unless "commercially sponsored," the results of the artificial sweetener study were "not good," as the former did

Unless "commercially sponsored," the results of the artificial sweetener study were "not good," as the former did

But which of the two experts is right? But which of the two experts is right? But which of the two experts is right?

In fact, from the above conclusions, the views of the two experts are actually not right or wrong

In fact, from the above conclusions, the views of the two experts are actually not right or wrong

The seemingly opposite view is due to the different

The first group of experts said that artificial sweeteners were bad because of water, coffee and tea

Her line of thinking about translating the evidence into clinical practice is roughly as follows — habitual intake of sugary drinks (SSBs) increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, and data have shown that routine intake of AS increases cardiometabolic risk, so replacing sugary drinks with water, coffee, or tea but not artificial sweetener beverages (ASBs) can reduce the risk

Obviously: this "allegation" of artificial sweeteners is not direct evidence

The second group of experts compared more free sugars (manufacturers added additional monosaccharides or disaccharides
).

The second group of experts compared more free sugars (manufacturers added additional monosaccharides or disaccharides
).

"Some sweeteners can indeed play a role in reducing body weight, and there are significant differences compared with sucrose, such as the yellow line as AS sucralose in the figure below, and the black line as sucrose.
.
.
The saccharin represented by the red line also produced a statistical difference
in weight change with sucralose.
”
。

"Some sweeteners can indeed play a role in reducing body weight, and there are significant differences compared with sucrose, such as the yellow line as AS sucralose in the figure below, and the black line as sucrose.
.
.
The saccharin represented by the red line also produced a statistical difference
in weight change with sucralose.
”
。

While the opposite is true, both groups of experts have come to the "correct" conclusion, with the former seemingly saying "cars are faster than bicycles" and the latter saying "bicycles are faster than walking.
"
There is no right or wrong between
the two.

While the opposite is true, both groups of experts have come to the "correct" conclusion, with the former seemingly saying "cars are faster than bicycles" and the latter saying "bicycles are faster than walking.
"
There is no right or wrong between
the two.
There is no one
right or wrong.

Understanding the research of the two experts with the mentality of selecting the best and the worst can lead to the following practical conclusions

To understand the research of the two experts with the mentality of selecting the best and the worst, you can understand the research of the two experts with the mentality of selecting the best and the worst, and you can understand the following practical conclusions

Drinking water (including coffee and tea) is better
than drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners.

Drinking water (including coffee and tea) is better
than drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners.
Drinking water (including coffee and tea) is better
than drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners.

Drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners may be better
than drinking beverages with added free sugar.

Drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners may be better
than drinking beverages with added free sugar.
Drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners Drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners Drinking beverages with artificial sweeteners may probably be better
than drinking beverages with added free sugars.
Better than drinking a drink with added free sugar
.
Better than drinking a drink with added free sugar
.

However, try to replace sugary drinks with water, tea, and coffee instead of drinks with artificial sweeteners
.

However, try to replace sugary drinks with water, tea, and coffee instead of drinks with artificial sweeteners
.
However, try to replace sugary drinks with water, tea, and coffee instead of drinks with artificial sweeteners
.

However, experts have said that there are many types of artificial sweeteners, such as banned saccharin, aspartame, which has caused safety controversy, sucralose, acesulfame potassium, cyclamate and so on
.

However, experts have said that there are many types of artificial sweeteners, such as banned saccharin, aspartame, which has caused safety controversy, sucralose, acesulfame potassium, cyclamate and so on
.

The problems that artificial sweeteners can cause have always been controversial, and even if they seem safe, we have reason to worry and doubt, after all, they are synthetic chemicals
.

The problems that artificial sweeteners can cause have always been controversial, and even if they seem safe, we have reason to worry and doubt, after all, they are synthetic chemicals
.

Of course, in addition to chemically synthesized sweeteners, there are also extracts from natural plants
.
Sugar is a kind of sugar, but under the current sugar reduction policy and social atmosphere, sugar has become the "enemy of the whole people"
.
So some new sugars that seem safer are used in large quantities, like erythritol
that is on fire by the Yuanqi Forest.
This type of sugar substitute has only been widely used in recent years, and there are not many authoritative studies, so whether it is good or bad speculation, it lacks convincing evidence
.

Of course, in addition to chemically synthesized sweeteners, there are also extracts from natural plants
.
Sugar is a kind of sugar, but under the current sugar reduction policy and social atmosphere, sugar has become the "enemy of the whole people"
.
So some new sugars that seem safer are used in large quantities, like erythritol
that is on fire by the Yuanqi Forest.
This type of sugar substitute has only been widely used in recent years, and there are not many authoritative studies, so whether it is good or bad speculation, it lacks convincing evidence
.

At present, the broad consensus is that 0 calories and 0 sugars can occasionally relieve hunger, but it is not recommended for long-term consumption
.
Moreover, if sugar is considered to be the only cause of obesity and diabetes, it may be unfair
.
Do you think that anyone who likes sweets, how many do not like other snacks and meals?

At present, the broad consensus is that 0 calories and 0 sugars can occasionally relieve hunger, but it is not recommended for long-term consumption
.
Moreover, if sugar is considered to be the only cause of obesity and diabetes, it may be unfair
.
Do you think that anyone who likes sweets, how many do not like other snacks and meals?

Sugar first appeared in Papua New Guinea about 10,000 years ago, and then is said to have reached the Americas, where European colonists brought it back to Europe and began to become a specialty
for the nobility and royalty.
Sugar is a symbol of a good life, and mr.
Lu Xun used sugar in an article to describe rich people
.

Sugar first appeared in Papua New Guinea about 10,000 years ago, and then is said to have reached the Americas, where European colonists brought it back to Europe and began to become a specialty
for the nobility and royalty.
Sugar is a symbol of a good life, and mr.
Lu Xun used sugar in an article to describe rich people
.

With the development of the economy and society, the number of obese and diabetic people is increasing
year by year.
For China, the trend of diabetes and the trend of economic development are almost synchronized
.
Sugar is representative of the era of material abundance and overnutrition, but not the only one
.

With the development of the economy and society, the number of obese and diabetic people is increasing
year by year.
For China, the trend of diabetes and the trend of economic development are almost synchronized
.
Sugar is representative of the era of material abundance and overnutrition, but not the only one
.

Author: Sugar Circle Sun Zhiming

Author: Sugar Circle Sun Zhiming

Responsible Editor: