Don't worry about the embarrassment of food

Introduction: December 18, 2001 Guizhou Daily News: at present, all kinds of "safe food" are competing on the stage, and the enterprise is proud to win this laurel But I think this kind of name should not be used again, because it may backfire and increase the psychological pressure of consumers Imagine, if we don't buy the product of "rest assured food", it means it's hard to rest assured? It's a sad thing After all, we smoke and burn among cannibals every day, and most people are unable to buy so-called "safe food" RIS in this case, if someone is still preaching reassuring food in our ears every day, what do you think? There is only one result, that is, it will become a luxury for some people to show off, and laugh at the fact that most people are swallowing low-grade food for survival and may threaten survival every day In addition, how does the selection come out? This is not really reassuring in itself If we really face a rare business credit crisis, how reliable is this business evaluation? After all, the pressure from environmental pollution is comprehensive It's easy to think that this kind of selection is just a selection of good or better apples from a pile of rotten apples RIS is the most urgent thing to protect the environment The selection is only a passive acceptance rather than an active solution Therefore, this kind of selection does not matter The most reluctant possibility is how will consumers bear the fact that "reassuring food" falls apart in a large area? The psychological trauma in front of us is bound to be a severe challenge, and this self satire will be haunting for a long time Its harm is extremely unpleasant to the government and the people, and it will never stop at the aspect of diet RIS, therefore, whether focusing on material or spiritual, "ease food" is not an easy term for us to bear This name is not recommended until the environment is resolved RIS