echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Colorectal cancer treatment: FOLFOXIRI + panituzumab vs. FOLFOX + panitumab

    Colorectal cancer treatment: FOLFOXIRI + panituzumab vs. FOLFOX + panitumab

    • Last Update: 2022-10-25
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    This article is from NEJM Journal Watch
    FOLFOXIRI/Panitumumab No Better Than FOLFOX/Panitumumab for Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer Treatment: FOLFOXIRI+ Panitumab is not superior to FOLFOX+Panitumab

    Review by David H.
    Ilson, MD, PhD


    The triple regimen failed to improve response or survival and was more
    toxic.


    Standard first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer includes modified FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted agents for patients with the left primary of RAS wild-type without BRAF V600E
    mutations.
    Studies have shown that initial treatment with the triple regimen FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab improves response rates and survival compared with dual chemotherapy (J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3314)


    Italian researchers conducted a randomized phase 3 trial of patients with advanced RAS and BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer that compared dual mFOLFOX + panitumab with triple mFOLFOXIRI + panitumab
    .
    The median age of the 435 patients was 59 years, 4% had received adjuvant therapy, 47% had the primary resected, and 88% had the left primary lesion
    .


    At a median follow-up of 26.
    5 months, there was no difference in all treatment outcomes between triple regimen and dual regimen, including objective response rate for the primary endpoint (73%~76%; odds ratio, 0.
    87; P = 0.
    526), progression-free survival (median, 12.
    7 and 12.
    3 months; hazard ratio, 0.
    88; P = 0.
    277), and eventual resection of metastases R0 (25% and 29%; Odds ratio, 0.
    81; P=0.
    317).

    In patients with the left primary lesion, there was no difference in response rates between dual and triple therapy (odds ratio, 1.
    07).

    mFOLFOXIRI was more toxic, with higher rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia (32% vs.
    20%), diarrhoea (23% vs.
    7%), and rash (29% vs.
    19%), as well as more treatment-related deaths (3 vs.
    0).

    comments

    The trial showed no advantage
    of triple mFOLFOXIRI+ panitumab versus dual mFOLFOX+ panitumab treatment for patients with wild-type advanced colon cancer with RAS and BRAF.
    The trial is clinically significant in suggesting that triple therapy is not meaningful in these patients, including patients with left-sided primary and those considering
    eventual metastasectomy.


    Articles that are commented on

    Rossini D et al.
    Upfront modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan plus panitumumab versus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin plus panitumumab for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: The phase III TRIPLETE study by GONO.
    J Clin Oncol 2022 Sep 1; 40:2878.
    (https://doi.
    org/10.
    1200/jco.
    22.
    00839)


    NEJM Journal Collection

    Published by NEJM Group, NEJM Journal Watch invites internationally renowned doctors to review important papers in the medical field to help doctors understand and apply the latest developments
    .
    NEJM Medical Frontiers is translated several times a week, published on the app and official website, and selected 2-3 articles are published
    on WeChat.


    Copyright Information This article is translated, written or commissioned
    by Jiahui Medical Research and Education Group (J-Med) and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
    The full Chinese translation and the figures contained therein are exclusively licensed
    by NEJM Group.
    If you need to reprint, please leave a message or contact nejmqianyan@nejmqianyan.
    cn
    .
    Unauthorized translation is an infringement and the copyright owner reserves the right to
    pursue legal responsibility.

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.