-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Compared with targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) produce unique anti-tumor responses and toxicity patterns
.
Patients who discontinue immunotherapy may be able to enjoy a period of disease control that does not require continuous anti-cancer treatment, but the toxicity of immunotherapy may persist
immunity
This study outlines the treatment-free survival (TFS) of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma undergoing immunotherapy with or without toxicity
.
The study data comes from the Phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial.
In this trial, a total of 1,096 newly-treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients received nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (n=550) or sunitinib ( n=546) Treatment
.
Definition of treatment-free survival: the time from the end of treatment to subsequent systemic treatment or death
Sunitinib
TFS in low-risk patients in the two treatment groups
TFS in low-risk patients in the two treatment groupsAt the 42nd month after randomization, 52% and 39% of the low- and medium-risk patients in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group and the sunitinib group were still alive; 18% and 5% of the patients, respectively No additional treatment was given
.
Among patients at favorable risk, 70% and 73% of the patients in the nivolumab+ipilimumab group and the sunitinib group were still alive; 20% and 9% of the patients were not treated with additional treatment, respectively
52% and 39% of low- and medium-risk patients in the nivolumab+ipilimumab group and sunitinib group, respectively, were still alive; 18% and 5% of the patients did not receive additional treatment, respectively
TFS of favorable risk patients in the two treatment groups
TFS of favorable risk patients in the two treatment groupsThe average EFS of low-risk patients in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group was twice that of the sunitinib group (6.
9 vs 3.
1 months); the average EFS of favorable-risk patients in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group It was three times that of the sunitinib group (11.
0 vs 3.
7 months)
.
In the two treatment groups, the average TFS with treatment-related adverse reactions of grade 3 and above accounted for only a small part of the time: nivolumab + ipilimumab group vs sunitinib group: 0.
The average EFS of low-risk patients in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group was twice that of the sunitinib group (6.
Regardless of the patient's risk, compared with the sunitinib group, patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab have significantly longer survival times without additional treatment without immune side effects
Original source:
Meredith M.
Treatment-free Survival after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy versus Targeted Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: 42-Month Results of the CheckMate 214 Trial in this message