echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Anesthesia Topics > [Classical high-scoring literature reading] Under the action of spontaneous breathing, volatile anesthetics are better than propofol to maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation

    [Classical high-scoring literature reading] Under the action of spontaneous breathing, volatile anesthetics are better than propofol to maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation

    • Last Update: 2022-02-24
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration MAC-related concepts ①MAC: The lowest alveolar concentration of inhalation anesthetic that can make 50% of patients have no action response to standardized stimulation (such as skin incision), about 1MAC
    .

    ②MAC awake95: The concentration of alveolar gas anesthetic when 95% of patients can open their eyes to simple instructions MACawake = 0.
    4 MAC ③ED50 (50% effective dose): the dose that causes 50% of the positive response (quality response) or 50% of the maximal effect (quantity response).
    or concentration
    .

    1.
    Background Although general anesthetics inhibit spontaneous breathing, the comprehensive effects of general anesthetics on respiratory function are unclear
    .

    Objective To investigate the effect of general anesthesia on spontaneous respiration in different types and doses of non-intubated mice
    .

    2.
    Methods Adult C57BL/6J mice were injected with intravenous anesthetics (propofol and etomidate) and inhaled anesthetics (0.
    5, 1.
    0, 2.
    0 MAC/ED50 sevoflurane and isoflurane) to reduce the righting reflex
    .

    Whole body plethysmography (WBP) was used to measure respiratory parameters without endotracheal intubation
    .

    At the same time, the changes of respiratory sensitivity to CO2 in patients under general anesthesia were measured
    .

    The following respiratory parameters were continuously recorded during anesthesia or CO exposure: respiratory rate (FR), tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (MV), expiratory time (TE), inspiratory time (TI), inspiratory-expiratory Time ratio (I/E) and peak inspiratory frequency
    .

    3.
    Results Sevoflurane or isoflurane at sub-anesthesia concentration of 0.
    5MAC increased respiratory rate (FR), tidal volume (TV) and minute ventilation (MV)
    .

    Under sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia, respiratory rate (FR), tidal volume (TV), and minute ventilation (MV) decreased with increasing CO2 concentration
    .

    Propofol and etomidate cause respiratory depression, manifested as a decrease in respiratory rate (FR), tidal volume (TV), and minute ventilation (MV)
    .

    During pure oxygen (100% O2) ventilation, the respiratory rate (FR) of propofol and etomidate were 69.
    63±33.
    44 times/min and 55.
    68±64.
    42 times/min, respectively
    .

    In 3% CO2 ventilation, they were 88.
    72±34.
    51 times/min and 225.
    10±59.
    82 times/min, respectively
    .

    In 5% CO2 ventilation, they were 144.
    17±63.
    25 times/min and 197.
    70±41.
    93 times/min, respectively
    .

    Compared with the propofol group, the mice in the etomidate group were more sensitive to CO2
    .

    Compared with etomidate, sevoflurane and isoflurane at equivalent doses, propofol resulted in a greater reduction in respiratory rate (FR), minute ventilation (MV), and inspiratory-expiratory time ratio (I/E).
    big
    .

    4.
    Conclusion The regulation of spontaneous breathing by general anesthesia is different
    .

    Inhalation anesthetics increase respiratory rate (FR), tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (MV) at sub-anaesthetic concentrations, while suppressing these respiratory parameters at higher concentrations
    .

    Propofol inhibited respiratory parameters to a greater extent than etomidate
    .

    5.
    Figure & Table F1.
    Comparison of MAC sevoflurane and isoflurane F2.
    The effect of sevoflurane on respiratory function is dose-dependent F3.
    The effect of isoflurane on respiratory function is dose-dependent F4.
    Intravenous anesthetics on breathing in vivo Effects of Response F5F6END
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Related Articles

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.