echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Endocrine System > Chinese study: What is the optimal criteria for weight gain during pregnancy?

    Chinese study: What is the optimal criteria for weight gain during pregnancy?

    • Last Update: 2023-01-07
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Yimaitong edited and arranged, please do not reprint
    without permission.


    Maternal weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy is closely related to pregnancy outcomes, and excessive or insufficient GWG can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes and even affect the health of
    offspring.
    Recently, a study based on Chinese groups found that GWG in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in China increased, and pregnant women in China were more sensitive
    to the optimal weight gain value than previous guideline recommendations.
    The findings were published in J Obstet Gynaecol Res
    .


    According to the specific BMI classification in China, the optimal GWG range is as follows: ➤The optimal GWG range for underweight women is 11.
    0-17.
    5kg; ➤ Normal weight women are 3.
    7-9.
    7kg; ➤Overweight women are -0.
    6~4.
    8kg➤Obese women are -9.
    8~4.
    2kg
    .

     

     

     

    The GWG standards for pregnant women with pre-pregnancy BMI are different in international and domestic countries

     

    At present, China's gestational weight management standards are implemented in the "Recommended Standards for Weight Growth of Pregnant Women" issued by the National Health Commission in July 2022, and the specific recommendations are shown in Table 1
    .

     

    Source: People's Republic of China Health Industry Standard WS/T801—2022

     

    According to the 2009 recommended standards of the American Institute of Medicine (IOM), there are some differences
    with the existing standards in China.


     

    Source: IOM

     

    The study included a total of 8103 pregnant women with GDM from 2017 to 2020, used a quadratic function model and the overall predicted probability of adverse pregnancy outcomes to obtain optimal GWG, and analysed the difference
    in the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes between the optimal GWG recommendation and the IOM 2009 GWG guidelines.

     

    China's best GWG, more sensitive than international

     

    1.
    According to the specific BMI classification in China, the optimal GWG range is as follows:


    ➤ The optimal GWG range for underweight women is 11.
    0-17.
    5kg;

    ➤ Normal weight women are 3.
    7-9.
    7kg;

    ➤ -0.
    6~4.
    8kg for overweight women

    ➤ Obese women are -9.
    8~4.
    2kg
    .

     

    2.
    Impact of GWG excess:


    ➤ Have a higher large-for-gestational age (LGA) (OR: 2.
    99, 95% CI 2.
    42–3.
    70);

    ➤ macrosomal risk (OR: 2.
    35, 95% CI 1.
    77–3.
    12);

    ➤ risk of pre-eclampsia (OR: 1.
    91, 95% CI 1.
    37–2.
    65);

    ➤ risk of hypertension during pregnancy (OR: 1.
    65, 95% CI 1.
    24–2.
    19);

    risk of caesarean section (OR: 1.
    29, 95% CI 1.
    15–1.
    44);

    ➤ Risk of postpartum haemorrhage (OR: 1.
    29, 95% CI 1.
    02–1.
    64).

     

    3.
    Impact of GWG deficiency:


    ➤ small-for-gestational-age infants were at higher risk (OR: 1.
    82, 95% CI 1.
    20 to 2.
    75); ➤ Compared with the IOM 2009 GWG guidelines, the prevalence of macrosomia, LGA, and postpartum hemorrhage were significantly reduced in GWG (P <0.
    05).

     

    brief summary

     

    The study found a specific BMI classification in China and compared the IOM 2009 GWG guidelines and found that pregnant women in China were more sensitive
    to the best GWG recommendations.

     

    Source: Fan X, Dai J, He J, et al.
    Optimal gestational weight gain in Chinese pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A large retrospective cohort study [published online ahead of print, 2022 Oct 2].
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res.
    2022; 10.
    1111/jog.
    15448.
    doi:10.
    1111/jog.
    15448

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.