echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Cancers: Efficacy of conventional therapy (CT, chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy) after treatment failure in dMMR/MSI metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

    Cancers: Efficacy of conventional therapy (CT, chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy) after treatment failure in dMMR/MSI metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

    • Last Update: 2022-02-19
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) progression followed by conventional therapy (CT, chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy) efficacy is unclear
    .

    Mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) progression followed by conventional therapy (CT, chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy) efficacy is unclear
    .


    Therefore, foreign researchers have carried out relevant studies to evaluate the efficacy of CT therapy after treatment failure in dMMR/MSI metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
    .


    The results were published in the journal Cancers


    Therefore, foreign researchers have carried out relevant studies to evaluate the efficacy of CT therapy after treatment failure in dMMR/MSI metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)


    A total of 31 dMMR/MSI mCRC patients were enrolled from June 2015 to January 2020
    .


    Median age was 56 years and 58% of patients had ECOG 0-1 when treatment was started after progression on ICI therapy


    A total of 31 dMMR/MSI mCRC patients were enrolled from June 2015 to January 2020


    Prior to ICI treatment, 48% of patients received targeted therapy with two or more chemotherapy regimens, and 100%, 94%, and 68% were exposed to fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, respectively


    In ICI therapy, 71% of patients (anti-PD-1, n = 15, anti-PDL-1, n = 7) were treated with anti-PD(L)-1 monotherapy, and 9 patients were treated with combination therapy


    The main chemotherapy regimens used after ICI treatment were FOLFOX (29%), FOLFIRI (29%) or trifluridine (16%), concomitant use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) The monoclonal antibody regimens were 39% and 19%, respectively


    The median follow-up time after ICI progression was 23.
    8 months, and the DCR was 45%, including 4 cases of PR and 10 cases of SD
    .


    Median PFS and OS were 2.


    The median follow-up time after ICI progression was 23.


    Prognostic factors found that only ECOG ≧2 was associated with worse PFS (HR=2.
    22, 95%CI 1.
    03, 4.
    77, p=0.
    045), but not OS
    .

    Prognostic factors found that only ECOG ≧2 was associated with worse PFS (HR=2.
    22, 95%CI 1.
    03, 4.
    77, p=0.
    045), but not OS
    .


    In summary, the study shows that previous ICI treatment does not enhance the efficacy of subsequent traditional treatment, but the sample size is limited, and further verification is required in the follow-up
    .

    In summary, the study shows that previous ICI treatment does not enhance the efficacy of subsequent traditional treatment, but the sample size is limited, and further verification is required in the follow-up
    .


    Studies have shown that previous ICI treatment does not enhance the efficacy of subsequent traditional treatment, but the sample size is limited, and further verification is needed in the future


    Original source:

    Original source:

    Bui, QL; Mas, L.
    ; Hollebecque, A.
    ; Tougeron, D.
    ; de la Fochardière, C.
    ; Pudlarz, T.
    ; Alouani, E.
    ; Guimbaud, R.
    ; Taieb, J.
    ; André, T.
    ; et al.
    Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Cancers 2022, 14,406.
    https://doi.
    org/10.
    3390/cancers14020406

    Bui, QL; Mas, L.
    ; Hollebecque, A.
    ; Tougeron, D.
    ; de la Fochardière, C.
    ; Pudlarz, T.
    ; Alouani, E.
    ; Guimbaud, R.
    ; Taieb, J.
    ; André, T.
    ; et al.
    Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Cancers 2022, 14, 406.
     https://doi.
    org/10.
    3390/cancers14020406 https://doi.
    org/10.
    3390/
    https :/ /doi.
    org/10.
    3390/ leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.