echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Diagnostic Test > Brain hemorrhage 6h maximum midline shift. 4mm prompt for poor prognosis

    Brain hemorrhage 6h maximum midline shift. 4mm prompt for poor prognosis

    • Last Update: 2020-06-27
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Ref: Yang WS, et alNeurocrit Care2018 Jun;28 (3): 314-321doi: 10.1007/s112028-017-0483-7brain haemorrhage (ICH) have high erality and mortality ratesInitial hematoma volume combined with other factors, such as age, first CT showing in-brain hemorrhage, and hospital GCS scores, can predict the clinical prognosis of spontaneous ICHHematoma directly damages, compresses and stimulates brain tissue as the main cause of early brain damage; Measuring midline shift (midline shift, MLS) is an easy way to quantify the early occupating effect of ICHknown to all, MLS is associated with poor prognosis in patients with cerebral hemorrhage, but the MLS threshold associated with poor prognosis in early ich is not yet knownMoreover, the relationship between MLS and prognosis of hematoma in different parts is also differentWen-Song Yang of the Department of Neurology at Yongchuan Hospital, affiliated with Chongqing Medical University, studied the relationship between MLS and clinical prognosis in 6h of ICH onset, and determined the optimal MLS threshold for predicting adverse prognosis, the results of which were published in the June 2018 issue of Neurocrit Carethe study included 199 cases of cerebral hemorrhage with 6hThe researchers measured MLS in several different locations, including pineal gland regions, transparent partitions, and brain sicklesThe so-called maximum MLS is the largest mid-line shift in different partsThe improved Rankin scale (mRS) evaluation function prognosis was used 3 months after onsetMultivariate logistic regression analysis analyzes the correlation between MLS and prognosisRoc curve analysis was used to determine whether MLS could predict adverse outcomes 90 days after onsetresults showed that of 199 patients, 78 (39.2%) had poor prognosis at 3 months after onset Comparing patients with good prognosis (mRS 3) and poor prognosis (mRS 3), it was found that the MLS and the largest MLS in the pineal area, transparent partition and brain sickle of patients with good prognosis were less than the patients with poor prognosis, and the difference was statistically significant (P.001) adjusted age, GCS score at the time of admission, ICH site, time to initial CT, initial ICH volume and ventricular hemorrhage, the maximum MLS was independently associated with poor prognosis (OR,1.30; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65; P-0.032) The author suggests that the maximum MLS 4mm should be set as the optimal threshold, and that there is a significant difference between the maximum MLS and the maximum MLS 4mm prediction poor prognosis (P 0.001) the final author thinks that the maximum MLS in the 6h after ICH is a separate factor to predict the patient's functional prognosis, and the maximum MLS-4mm is the best threshold for judging poor prognosis (compiled by Lushan Na, editor-in-chief of "Outside Information" and editor-in-chief of Fudan University's affiliated Huashan Hospital
    Professor Chen Jicheng ) related links
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.