echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Blood System > 【BLOOD】Outcome after failure of CD19 CART for aggressive B-cell lymphoma from the French DESCAR-T registry study

    【BLOOD】Outcome after failure of CD19 CART for aggressive B-cell lymphoma from the French DESCAR-T registry study

    • Last Update: 2022-09-30
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    CD19 CAR T cell therapy is the mainstay of treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory sexually aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R invasive BCL
    ).


     

    In the JULIET study, nearly 60% of patients progressed 6 months after CAR T cell infusion; The ZUMA 1 and TRANSCEND studies showed that about 50% of patients relapsed at 6 months; These data have also been confirmed
    in multiple real-world studies.


     

    The DESCAR-T registry study is a French national registry study designed by LYSA/LYSARC to collect real-world data
    on commercial CAR-T cells (axi-cel and tisa-cel) within 15 years of CAR-T cell infusion.


     

    Professor Catherine Thieblemont of France led the analysis of patient outcomes of progression/relapse of CAR T cells registered in DESCAR-T and determined the prognostic markers and treatment options after CAR-T in this population, and deeply studied the relationship between
    treatment strategies at relapse and outcomes after CD19 CAR T failure.


    fruit

    patient

     

    From August 2018 to April 12, 2021, the DESCAR-T registry study registered 680 consecutive patients with R/R invasive BCL, of which 550 received an infusion at the time of analysis and patients received axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel, n=350) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, n=200).


     

    After a median follow-up of 7.


     

    At the time of treatment/before the treatment was decided, most patients (n = 178, 74.


     

    Of the 238 patients with relapse/disease progression after CAR T cell therapy, 54 patients (22.


     

    Treatment and remission in case of CAR T failure

     

    To further characterize treatment in patients with relapse/progression after CAR T cell therapy, the authors analyze subsequent treatments and types
    .


     

    Of the 154 patients with recurrence/progression after CAR T treatment, 120 (77.


     

    Efficacy outcomes for different treatment types after failure of CAR T therapy

     

    The authors further analyzed the response rate and survival outcomes after CAR-T recurrence and grouped treatments by category (Figure 1
    ).


     

    The median PFS-2 after bispecific antibody, lenalidomide, targeted therapy, and immunochemotherapy was 3.


     

    finale

     

    In the overall patient population receiving CAR T cell therapy, the median PFS was 4.


     

    For the 238 patients who failed, PFS-2 calculated since relapse/progression of CAR T cell infusion was 2.


     

    The authors also analyzed PFS-2 and OS-2 for relapse/progression time after CAR T cell infusion based on CAR T treatment failure time: median PFS-2 was 1.


     

    Prognostic factors

     

    In the univariate model, factors significantly associated with PFS-2 deterioration include high LDH at infusion (p< 0.


     

    Factors associated with poor OS-2 include high LDH (p< 0.
    0001, HR=2.
    66), ECOG PS≥2 (p=0.
    0008, HR= 2.
    37) during infusion, very early progression (D0-D30, p< 0.
    0001, HR=2.
    59), abnormal CRP and ferritin levels during infusion (CRP:p= 0.
    0006, HR= 1.
    05; ferritin: p= 0.
    0002, HR= 1.
    01); The type of treatment after CAR T also had no significant correlation with OS-2: bispecific antibodies (p=0.
    2, HR=0.
    51), lenalidomide (p=0.
    06, HR=0.
    60), targeted therapies (p=0.
    7, HR=0.
    91).

     

    In multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor PFS-2 included high LDH at infusion (p< 0.
    0001, HR= 3.
    42) and abnormal ferritin levels during infusion (p= 0.
    01, HR= 1.
    02) (Table 3); There was no significant correlation between the type of therapy after CAR T and PFS-2: bispecific antibodies (p=0.
    98, HR = not reached), lenalidomide (p=0.
    07, HR=0.
    55, with a tendency to improve), targeted therapies (p=0.
    3, HR=0.
    69).

     

    The multivariate analysis of OS-2 identified the following factors associated with the poorer outcome (Table 3): high LDH (p= 0.
    01, HR= 2.
    10), elevated CRP (p= 0.
    003, HR= 1.
    11), and very early progression (D0-D30, p= 0.
    0009, HR= 2.
    93).

    。 Some treatment types after CAR T were not significantly associated with OS-2: bispecific antibodies (p=0.
    15, HR=0.
    22) or targeted therapies (p=0.
    078, HR=0.
    47), but lenalidomide therapy was significantly associated with OS-2 optimization (p=0.
    01, HR=0.
    42).

     

    discuss

    CD19 CAR T cell therapy is an important breakthrough in R/R aggressive BCL therapy, but post-infusion failure is also common, with recurrence rates of up to 66%
    in key clinical studies and real-world reports.
    Features of patients at high risk of recurrence include total metabolic tumor volume, LDH, PS, CD19 status, etc.
    , and properties of CAR T cell products such as kinetics, dose, and intrinsic factors in the tumor also have an impact
    .

     

    This DESCAR-T registry study confirmed that outcomes remain extremely poor in patients who fail after CAR T cell therapy, and even worse
    if they fail within the first month.
    Alternative therapeutic strategies (bispecific antibodies, lenalidomide) may improve PFS rates
    in these patients.
    Overall, patients with R/R invasive BCL who fail after CD-19 CAR T cell therapy still have unmet medical needs and further innovative strategies are needed to improve outcomes
    in such patients.

     

    References

    Roberta Di Blasi,et al.
    Outcomes of patients with aggressive B-Cell lymphoma after failure of anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy: A DESCAR-T analysis.
    Blood .
    2022 Sep 19; blood.
    2022016945.
    doi: 10.
    1182/blood.
    2022016945.

    : ,
    。 Video Mini Program like, tap twice to cancel like in viewing, tap twice to cancel in viewing

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.