Announcement of the State Administration for Market Regulation on Unqualified Sampling Inspection of 10 Batches of Food [2022 No. 4]

Recently, the State Administration for Market Regulation organized food safety supervision and sampling inspections , sampling processed grain products, edible agricultural products , sugar , tea and related products, dairy products , beverages , alcohol , cakes , roasted seeds and nuts products , biscuits , starch and starch products , Instant food , potato and puffed food , egg products , bee products , canned food , vegetable products, fruit products, meat products, aquatic products, condiments, frozen drinks, quick-frozen foods, candy products, infant formula food419 batches of samples of 28 categories of food, including health food, special dietary food, edible oil, grease and their products, among which 5 categories of food including edible agricultural products, tea and related products, beverages, aquatic products and infant formula food were detected 10 batches of samples failed
.
The main problems found were organic pollutant pollution, excessive pesticide residues, out-of-range use of food additives, and inconsistency between quality indicators and label values
.
Product sampling results can be found at https://spcjsac.
gsxt.
gov.
cn/
.

 

For the unqualified food found in the random inspection, the State Administration for Market Regulation has instructed the provincial market supervision departments in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Guangdong, Chongqing, Sichuan, Yunnan, Tibet, Qinghai and other provincial-level market supervision departments to immediately organize verification and disposal, find out the flow of products, and urge Enterprises take measures to control risks, such as withdrawing and recalling substandard products; strictly deal with violations of laws and regulations in accordance with the law; promptly disclose the risk prevention and control measures taken by enterprises and the status of verification and disposal to the public, and report to the General Administration
.

 

The specific situation of unqualified food for supervision and sampling inspection is hereby notified as follows:

 

1.
The problem of organic pollutant pollution

 

　　Tmall Tangpin flagship store (operated by Zhejiang Hangzhou Tangtang Food Co.
, Ltd.
) sold in Tmall Mall (online store), nominally distributed by Jiangsu Lianyungang Tangpin Food Co.
, Ltd.
, and Zhejiang Zhoushan Hengguan Food Co.
, Ltd.
The carbon-grilled squid shreds produced by the company (packaged separately), in which the detection value of N-dimethylnitrosamine does not meet the national food safety standards
.
The inspection agency is Shandong Institute of Food and Drug Inspection
.

 

　　2.
The problem of excessive pesticide residues

 

　　(1) The cowpeas sold by Yilong Wanxiang Store of Kunming Carrefour Supermarket Co.
, Ltd.
in Yunnan Province and from Kunming Shuhua Economic and Trade Co.
, Ltd.
in Yunnan Province, in which the residues of methylamino abamectin benzoate and omethoate are not in compliance with food safety National standard regulations
.
The inspection agency is Sichuan Food Inspection Research Institute
.

 

　　(2) Cowpeas from Qinghai Zhanhuan Trading Co.
, Ltd.
sold by Caiying Vegetable Store, Chengxi District, Xining City, Qinghai Province, the residues of methylaminoabamectin benzoate did not meet the national food safety standards
.
The inspection agency is Shandong Institute of Food and Drug Inspection
.

 

　　(3) Bananas sold by Chenggongxin Lianxin Supermarket in Kunming City, Yunnan Province from Jinma Zhengchang Fruit Market (Supplier: Yan Tianliang) in Guandu District, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, the residues of imidacloprid do not meet the national food safety standards
.
The inspection agency is Sichuan Food Inspection Research Institute
.

 

　　(4) Bananas sold by Xingzhiguang Supermarket in Chengdong District, Xining City, Qinghai Province and from Lulutong Vegetable Distribution Department, Chengbei District, Xining City, Qinghai Province, the residues of imidacloprid do not meet the national food safety standards
.
The inspection agency is Shandong Institute of Food and Drug Inspection
.

 

　　(5) Jinjian tea and Kangzhuan tea sold by Geely Stores in Karuo District, Changdu, Tibet Autonomous Region and nominally produced by Sichuan Ya’an Zhougongshan Tea Co.
, Ltd.
, contain glyphosate residues that do not meet the national food safety standards
.
The inspection agency is Chengdu Food Inspection Research Institute
.

 

　　3.
The problem of over-use of food additives

 

　　The Tipco orange juice (country of origin: Thailand) sold by Chongqing Hema Xiansheng Network Technology Co.
, Ltd.
Zifu Road Branch and officially distributed by Shanghai Hema Network Technology Co.
, Ltd.
The test value of Simi does not meet the requirements of national food safety standards
.
The Zifu Road Branch of Chongqing Hema Xiansheng Network Technology Co.
, Ltd.
objected to the inspection results and applied for a re-inspection; after the re-inspection by the Chongqing Customs Technology Center, the initial inspection conclusion was maintained
.

 

　　Fourth, the quality index does not match the label value

 

　　It is produced by Valio Ltd, Lapinlahti production plant and sold by Guangzhou Canchen Bio-Tech Co.
, Ltd.
Infant formula milk powder (0-6 months of age 1, country of origin: Finland), the inspection and research institute of Guangzhou Inspection, Testing and Certification Group Co.
, Ltd.
found that the iron content value was lower than 80% of the value indicated on the product label
.
Mierele Dairy (Shanghai) Co.
, Ltd.
objected to the inspection results and applied for re-inspection; after re-inspection by Shanghai Institute of Quality Supervision and Inspection Technology, the initial inspection conclusion was maintained
.
After that, the same batch of products distributed by Shandong Baohetang Trading Co.
, Ltd.
and sold by Mingshui Royal Beibei Maternity and Baby Products Store in Zhangqiu City, Jinan City, Shandong Province were followed up and sampled.
, the iron content value still does not meet the product labeling requirements
.
The Shanghai Municipal Market Supervision Bureau fined Shanghai Taihao International Trade Co.
, Ltd.
in two cases, confiscated 156,000 yuan of illegal gains and fined 1,306,000 yuan
.
Guangzhou Liwan District and Jinan Municipal Bureau of Market Supervision respectively charged Guangzhou Canchen Biotechnology Co.
, Ltd.
, Zhangqiu City, Jinan City, Shandong Province Mingshui Royal Beibei Maternity and Baby Products Store and distributor Shandong Baohetang who sold the above-mentioned substandard products.
The Commerce and Trade Co.
, Ltd.
imposed administrative penalties, with a total of 86,700 yuan of illegal income confiscated and a fine of 86,700 yuan
.

 

　　hereby notified
.

 

　　Attachment: 1.

Small knowledge of some unqualified inspection items

 

　　2.

Information on unqualified products in the supervision and sampling inspection of aquatic products

 

　　3.

Information on unqualified products in the supervision and sampling inspection of edible agricultural products

 

　　4.

Information on unqualified products in the supervision and sampling inspection of tea and related products

 

　　5.

Information on unqualified products in beverage supervision and sampling inspection

 

　　6.

Information on unqualified products in infant formula food supervision and sampling inspection

 

　　State Administration for Market Regulation

 

　　January 12, 2022