All over Guangdong, the treatment of dead pigs thrown to sell fake drugs, different severity, the maximum fine of 200,000

Cities in Guangdong Province have formulated discretionary quantitative standards for administrative penalties since 2010, but most of them are trial versionsThere is no clear answer or a unified time for the Guangdong Provincial Government to make uniform adjustments and revisions to other cities according to the development of livestockDkJ
Since 2010, cities across Guangdong Province have formulated discretionary quantitative standards for administrative punishment, but most of them are trial versionsAccording to Xiao Jiayu, deputy director of the policy and regulation department of the Guangdong Provincial Agriculture Department, the planning for the revision and adjustment of the pilot version of guangdong cities is not clear, there is no inter-planning table, whether it needs to be revised, according to the specific situation of the cities to determine"Because according to the situation of different cities, for the discretionary measures, the local cities can be determined according to the actual situation, discretionary time two or more cases to consider, or directly to the numerical quantitative standards, the standards are also within acceptable range." "
DkJis understood that Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Agriculture this time announced the discretionary quantitative standards of administrative punishment has been formulated in 2010, and Dongguan City, Foshan City, etchave also issued the relevant standardsThe Regulations on the Discretionofof administrative punishment of Guangdong Province were officially implemented on January 1, 2012, requiring the administrative punishment authorities in various cities in Guangdong Province to formulate relevant quantitative standards for punishment, thus urging the implementation of the discretionary quantitative standard sizing of administrative penalties, and the municipalities in various places may formulate corresponding standards for punishment according to the actual situationDkJthrowing dead pigs with a maximum fine of 3000DkJrecently, Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Agriculture in 2010 to establish the "Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Agriculture, the discretionary quantitative standards for administrative punishment" has been adjusted and revisedCompared with the quantitative standards of discretion issued in various places, the reporter found that Jiangmen more use the cumulative number of violations to measure the degree of violations and determine the amount of punishment, Zhaoqing is more inclined to use the cumulative number of violations and the consequences of the two-way judgment, and the introduction of Foshan City in 2010 the discretionary quantitative standards of administrative punishment is not broken downDkJ
　　The animal carcasses and their excreta, which are unknown caused by unknown causes, are thrown indiscriminately, which is very easy to cause the spread of pathogenic microorganisms, and the death of pigs in the Huangpu River has been widely concerned In this Jiangmen introduced the discretionary refinement standard scant on it is also very harsh, for the initial violation of the epidemic prevention law Article 75, the initiative to reduce the consequences of the harm should also be 500-1000 fines, and again illegal and serious consequences of the penalty of 1000-2000 yuan fine DkJ
　　Compared with Jiangmen, Zhaoqing's punishment in this regard is more "gentle", Zhaoqing City Livestock and Veterinary Bureau will violate the provisions of the Animal Epidemic Prevention Law 75 into four types of circumstances, including two or more times to throw dead pig carcasses and other violations of the provisions will be punished by 1000 yuan or less DkJ
　　Foshan City, the provisions, in accordance with the provisions of harmless treatment of infected animals and their products, the illegal unit to be fined 3000 yuan, the individual who violated the law to a fine of 1000 yuan all over Guangdong to treat the throwing of dead pigs selling fake drugs different weight, the maximum penalty of 200,000 all over Guangdong to treat dead pigs to sell fake drugs different weight severity of 200,000 (2) 1 / 2 1 2 next page guangdong province cities since 2010 onwards developed a quantitative standard of administrative punishment, but most of them are trial version There is no clear answer or a unified time for the Guangdong Provincial Government to make uniform adjustments and revisions to other cities according to the development of livestock DkJ
　　Since 2010, cities across Guangdong Province have formulated discretionary quantitative standards for administrative punishment, but most of them are trial versions According to Xiao Jiayu, deputy director of the policy and regulation department of the Guangdong Provincial Agriculture Department, the planning for the revision and adjustment of the pilot version of guangdong cities is not clear, there is no inter-planning table, whether it needs to be revised, according to the specific situation of the cities to determine "Because according to the situation of different cities, for the discretionary measures, the local cities can be determined according to the actual situation, discretionary time two or more cases to consider, or directly to the numerical quantitative standards, the standards are also within acceptable range." "
DkJ is understood that Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Agriculture this time announced the discretionary quantitative standards of administrative punishment has been formulated in 2010, and Dongguan City, Foshan City, etc have also issued the relevant standards The Regulations on the Discretionofof administrative punishment of Guangdong Province were officially implemented on January 1, 2012, requiring the administrative punishment authorities in various cities in Guangdong Province to formulate relevant quantitative standards for punishment, thus urging the implementation of the discretionary quantitative standard sizing of administrative penalties, and the municipalities in various places may formulate corresponding standards for punishment according to the actual situation DkJ throwing dead pigs with a maximum fine of 3000 DkJ recently, Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Agriculture in 2010 to establish the "Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Agriculture, the discretionary quantitative standards for administrative punishment" has been adjusted and revised Compared with the quantitative standards of discretion issued in various places, the reporter found that Jiangmen more use the cumulative number of violations to measure the degree of violations and determine the amount of punishment, Zhaoqing is more inclined to use the cumulative number of violations and the consequences of the two-way judgment, and the introduction of Foshan City in 2010 the discretionary quantitative standards of administrative punishment is not broken down DkJ
　　The animal carcasses and their excreta, which are unknown caused by unknown causes, are thrown indiscriminately, which is very easy to cause the spread of pathogenic microorganisms, and the death of pigs in the Huangpu River has been widely concerned In this Jiangmen introduced the discretionary refinement standard scant on it is also very harsh, for the initial violation of the epidemic prevention law Article 75, the initiative to reduce the consequences of the harm should also be 500-1000 fines, and again illegal and serious consequences of the penalty of 1000-2000 yuan fine DkJ
　　Compared with Jiangmen, Zhaoqing's punishment in this regard is more "gentle", Zhaoqing City Livestock and Veterinary Bureau will violate the provisions of the Animal Epidemic Prevention Law 75 into four types of circumstances, including two or more times to throw dead pig carcasses and other violations of the provisions will be punished by 1000 yuan or less DkJ
　　Foshan City, the provisions, in accordance with the provisions of harmless treatment of infected animals and their products, the illegal unit to be fined 3000 yuan, the individual who violated the law to a fine of 1000 yuan