"17 yuan to eat Haidilao", complained that the service is not active, netizens hotly discuss whether to set a minimum consumption

01 "17 yuan eats up Haidilao", shouldn't it be scolded?

What is the concept of spending 27 a meal in Haidilao?

Anyway, this can only be regarded as a basic operation in the strategy of eating Haidilao at a low price.

In a certain sound and a certain book, there are a lot of posts similar to teaching you to squeeze Haidilao wool.

The secret is to try to avoid something.

For example, a netizen recently said that he spent 17 yuan on a Haidilao meal, and ordered four clear water pots (free), one for noodles, and one snack.

The rest is eating fruits, cold dishes, free snacks.

The netizen who mentioned at the beginning to eat Haidilao for 27 yuan was even more ruthless.

She took her two children to eat together.

As a result, after eating the baby steamed egg, children’s fruit plate, and tomato soup provided by Haidilao, and doing free hand care.

She complained that Haidilao's service was not so good, and her attitude was "very embarrassing.

In fact, this approach was particularly popular in the first two years.

Some people go to Haidilao for afternoon tea, bring their own juicer, and use Haidilao’s free ice cubes to make fruit smoothies;

Some people who use Haidilao as a kitchen, order four free compartments of water, and then cook porridge, mix cucumbers, and homemade tomatoes in the pot;

Anyway, there have been any strange ideas, and some of the bloggers who made the video were generous and didn't think there was anything wrong with their behavior;

But some also feel guilty and emphasize that they actually made normal consumption after filming the video.

The person who ate Haidilao for 27 yuan is a little different from this group of people.

She was picked out by netizens as a professional "wool blogger" and took her children to Starbucks to eat free pet cream.

After the post became popular, the first reaction of most netizens was to blame the parent.

Some say she is thick-skinned, and some say she doesn't think about children.

Everyone seems to have a consensus on this matter, that is, it must be indecent and morally lacking.

But as to whether this practice should be stopped, the opinions of netizens are quite divided.

Proponents feel that since this method of weaving wool is morally improper, it should not allow any part of the people to take advantage of the loopholes.

So some netizens suggested that Haidilao should set a minimum consumption or treat these low-consumption customers differently.

However, opponents believe that since the benefits provided by Haidilao allow people to take advantage of it, there is no reason to prohibit this kind of squeezing of wool.

"After all, everyone eats hot pot, there is no need to worry about selling hot pot.

When netizens were arguing about whether Haidilao should set a minimum consumption, the store in question came out to respond.

In response to the parent’s questioning that he was treated differently, Haidilao said that it is their freedom for the guests to consume.

"As long as they come, they will be served normally, and they will not be treated differently.

When asked if a minimum consumption would be set for this reason, the staff also made it clear that there is no such plan.

Haidilao still has not lost its most popular "pet fan" personality in dealing with the madness of the wool.

This approach is not unexpected.

After all, this is Haidilao, who was scolded for price increases during the epidemic and obediently lowered the price.

At least to please consumers, this hot pot restaurant has always done a lot.

But this time, some netizens were not actually pleased.

Haidilao's acquiescence to the wool, in their opinion, is not a happy ending for everyone.

At least from past experience, some people have a small advantage, but the final cost is often passed on to those who do not.

02 Endless stalking of wool, how many sheep have stalked dead?

There is nothing new under the sun.

The practice of using restaurant wool has been ruined more than 20 years ago.

Back then, Pizza Hut launched a salad buffet, the rule is that only one plate can be taken once per person.

Earlier, although people were crazy about loading fruits with the idea of ​​a strong meal of wool, but because of limited imagination, they only got a little air next to the wool.

Later, I don't know which great god has researched the fruit tower, and builds the fruit into a hill like a pile of wood.

、，。

X。

，，。

，，、。

，。，，。

。

2009，，“”。

、，。

，。

“”，。

。

3，。

。

，，，。

，，，0.

，。

，、。

，，，。

。

，，“”。

，，。

，。

，，、。

，。

，、，。

，。

03“”

。，。

，，“”。

，、；

，，，。

、“”，，。

，“”，。

，。

2，“”。

，。

，。

，，，，。

，。

，。

、：

“，，。”

“”，，。

，。

，。

，。

，，。

On short videos and grass-growing platforms, they are packaged as curious and maverick behaviors, which arouse people's interest in watching and imitating.

Various online celebrity shops and attractions have gradually become an incubator for popular videos from places of consumption.

Merchants who use short videos and social platforms to skyrocket the flow of traffic should not have imagined that one day they will become someone else’s traffic password.

The bottom line of connivability is beyond the control of dilemma businesses.

If you just go to an ordinary children's clothing store and squeeze children's clothing to take pictures, this behavior is both unqualified and embarrassing;

But if the check-in object becomes Uniqlo, it will become a trend and embrace fashion;

If you just go to an ordinary hot pot restaurant to order water pot and eat free fruit, the person will feel ashamed and uneasy;

But because the object of scalloping wool was changed to Haidilao, it became a kind of playful and interesting.

The word "net celebrity" has given more and more indecent behavior legitimacy.

In the face of the temptation of traffic, businesses are unable to sustain themselves, and continue to fuel this deformity trend.

Those who broke the rules eventually killed the rules and eventually plundered the rights of others.

Once more and more people are exploiting loopholes in the rules, businesses can stop losses in time.

Other ordinary people who steadfastly consume according to the rules have to give up their rights because of abiding by the rules, and suffer unpredictable disasters.

Businesses should understand that traffic is not something that can be manipulated at will.

If there is no bottom line to indulge a small number of people in exchange for traffic, it will ultimately hurt the interests of the majority.

It may not be far away from the day when the traffic is overwhelmed.

Source: WeChat public account: Vista sees the world

Note: All pictures in the article are reprinted on the Internet, and infringement will be deleted!