-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Too long to not read the version (author's summary):
Too long to not read the version (author's summary):Why do this research?
Why do this research?-
Heart vascular whether the health affects physical activity (PA) and health outcomes between dose - response association is still controversial
-
Studies of cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients found different associations between PA and reduced mortality.
-
Recent studies have shown that the cardiovascular health benefits of PA or the risk of death may be field-specific, because PA during leisure time and PA during work report different outcomes
Heart vascular whether the health affects physical activity (PA) and health outcomes between dose - response association is still controversial
Heart vascular whether the health affects physical activity (PA) and health outcomes between dose - response association is still controversial
Blood vessel
Studies of cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients found different associations between PA and reduced mortality.
Studies of cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients found different associations between PA and reduced mortality.
Recent studies have shown that the cardiovascular health benefits of PA or the risk of death may be field-specific, because PA during leisure time and PA during work report different outcomes
Recent studies have shown that the cardiovascular health benefits of PA or the risk of death may be field-specific, because PA during leisure time and PA during work report different outcomes
What did the researchers do and what did they find?
What did the researchers do and what did they find?-
A cohort study (median follow-up of 6.
-
For healthy individuals and CVRF patients, the shape of the dose-response relationship between MVPA and cardiovascular events and death is curvilinear, while a linear relationship is found in CVD patients
-
The association between MVPA and the risk of cardiovascular disease or death is scenario-specific, because leisure time activities are associated with most benefits, non-leisure time activities have little benefit, and work activities have no benefit
A cohort study (median follow-up of 6.
A cohort study (median follow-up of 6.
Cardiovascular events
For healthy individuals and CVRF patients, the shape of the dose-response relationship between MVPA and cardiovascular events and death is curvilinear, while a linear relationship is found in CVD patients
For healthy individuals and CVRF patients, the shape of the dose-response relationship between MVPA and cardiovascular events and death is curvilinear, while a linear relationship is found in CVD patients
The association between MVPA and the risk of cardiovascular disease or death is scenario-specific, because leisure time activities are associated with most benefits, non-leisure time activities have little benefit, and work activities have no benefit
.
The association between MVPA and the risk of cardiovascular disease or death is scenario-specific, because leisure time activities are associated with most benefits, non-leisure time activities have little benefit, and work activities have no benefit
.
What do these findings mean?
What do these findings mean?-
MVPA is associated with risk reduction in all groups, but CVD patients should be encouraged in particular, and PA should be encouraged to "the more the better
.
" -
PA recommendations can be optimized by considering cardiovascular health status and MVPA scenarios
.
MVPA is associated with risk reduction in all groups, but CVD patients should be encouraged in particular, and PA should be encouraged to "the more the better
.
"
MVPA is associated with risk reduction in all groups, but CVD patients should be encouraged in particular, and PA should be encouraged to "the more the better
.
"
PA recommendations can be optimized by considering cardiovascular health status and MVPA scenarios
.
PA recommendations can be optimized by considering cardiovascular health status and MVPA scenarios
.
Regular physical activity (PA) is closely related to reducing the risk and mortality of non-communicable diseases
.
The 2020 WHO Physical Activity Guidelines recommends that adults do at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA per week, or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity PA per week, or an equivalent combination of the two
.
It also pointed out that people with chronic diseases should not follow a "one size fits all" approach and may benefit from alternative exercise prescriptions
.
This is especially important in light of the debate about whether health status affects the dose-response association between PA and event rate
.
.
guide
Data from the general population indicate that the benefits of PA on mortality and morbidity follow a curvilinear dose-response relationship, indicating that PA with low or moderate physical activity can produce a greater risk reduction, while further increases in physical activity have only a small additional benefit
.
In contrast, studies of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have shown conflicting results
.
Some studies have found a linear relationship between PA and reduced mortality, while other studies support the existence of a reverse J-shaped or U-shaped relationship
.
An important limitation of these studies is that they only included a single group.
No studies directly compared the PA dose-response relationship between individuals with different cardiovascular health conditions
.
.
This study compared healthy individuals, individuals with elevated levels of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and CVD individuals with moderate to severe (MV) PA doses and the relationship between major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality
.
The association of specific scenarios of cumulative moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (including leisure, non-leisure, and professional activities) on the outcome has also been studied, because recent studies have shown that the health benefits of PA may vary depending on the PA scenario
.
1.
Research population data
142,493
。(42[SD 12))、(40%)BMI(25 [Q2523 Q7528]CVRF(54[SD 11],45%,BMI 27 [Q2525, Q7530])CVD(60 [SD 11],65% ,BMI 28 [Q2525, Q7531]) (1)
。:,,HDL,,
。MVPA(3666 MET/[Q251825;Q757344]),CVRF(3420 MET/[Q251,674;Q756,567])CVD( MET 3333 / [Q251,460;Q756,093]3MVPA
。MVPA68%,CVRF78%,CVD89%
。
。
2、
2、 6.
8 (Q255.
7;Q757.
9),5799:1605,4194MACE
。2.
2%(1120182485),CVRF7.
9%(279822214),CVD40.
9%(24931019)
。Kaplan-Meier,,(1)
。
8 (Q255.
7;Q757.
9),5799:1605,4194MACE
。2.
2%(1120182485),CVRF7.
9%(279822214),CVD40.
9%(24931019)
。Kaplan-Meier,,(1)
。 6.
8 (Q255.
7;Q757.
9),5799:1605,4194MACE
。2.
2%(1120182485),CVRF7.
9%(279822214),CVD40.
9%(24931019)
。Kaplan-Meier,,(1)
。2.
2%CVRF7.
9%CVD40.
9%,
3、MVPA
,MVPA(HR 0.
998/500 MET min/[95% CI 0.
993, 1.
00],P = 0.
36)MACE(HR 0.
997/500 MET min/ [95% CI 0.
986, 1.
01],P = 0.
86)(2)
。,CVD,MVPA(HR 0.
991 [95%CI 0.
9830.
999],P = 0.
04)
。 ,CVRFP(P = 0.
002<0.
001),MVPA、MACE
。
002<0.
001),MVPA、MACE
。MVPA、MACE
MVPA ,, MACE (2,2)
。(2),,(HR 0.
71 [95% CI 0.
560.
89],P = 0.
004),(HR 0.
72 [95% CI 0.
570.
91],P = 0.
006)(HR 0.
76 [95% CI 0.
600.
96],P = 0.
02)HR
。 MVPA,CVRFHR(HRs Q1 0.
69 [95% CI 0.
57 - 0.
82],P <0.
001,Q2 0.
66 [95% CI 0.
55 - 0.
80],P <0.
001,Q3 0.
64 [95% CI 0.
530.
77],P <0.
001,Q4 0.
69 [95% CI 0.
570.
84],P <0.
001)
。 ,CVD,MACE(HRs Q1 0.
80 [95% CI 0.
62, 1.
03],P = 0.
09,Q2 0.
82 [95% CI 0.
63, 1.
06],P = 0.
13,Q3 0.
74 [95% CI 0.
57, 0.
95],P = 0.
02,Q4 0.
70 [95% CI 0.
53, 0.
93], P = 0.
01)
。
。(2),,(HR 0.
71 [95% CI 0.
560.
89],P = 0.
004),(HR 0.
72 [95% CI 0.
570.
91],P = 0.
006)(HR 0.
76 [95% CI 0.
600.
96],P = 0.
02)HR
。 MVPA,CVRFHR(HRs Q1 0.
69 [95% CI 0.
57 - 0.
82],P <0.
001,Q2 0.
66 [95% CI 0.
55 - 0.
80],P <0.
001,Q3 0.
64 [95% CI 0.
530.
77],P <0.
001,Q4 0.
69 [95% CI 0.
570.
84],P <0.
001)
。 ,CVD,MACE(HRs Q1 0.
80 [95% CI 0.
62, 1.
03],P = 0.
09,Q2 0.
82 [95% CI 0.
63, 1.
06],P = 0.
13,Q3 0.
74 [95% CI 0.
57, 0.
95],P = 0.
02,Q4 0.
70 [95% CI 0.
53, 0.
93], P = 0.
01)
。, MACE P
Therefore, the relationship between MVPA and health outcomes is different between healthy individuals and CVD patients (interaction P: Q1 P = 0.
39, Q2 P = 0.
01, Q3 P = 0.
20, Q4 P = 0.
11; Figure 2 Table 2)
.
In further adjustment of additional covariates (model 3), as the MVPA increases, the reduction in adverse consequences persists, but many estimates are no longer statistically significant, especially in healthy individuals
.
Repeating the analysis of these secondary results greatly strengthened the relationship between MVPA and event rates (S2 and S3 tables)
.
Sensitivity analysis (S4 table) confirmed the main analysis and showed that reverse causality bias and age restriction did not substantially change the results
.
39, Q2 P = 0.
01, Q3 P = 0.
20, Q4 P = 0.
11; the relationship between MVPA and health outcomes The relationship between healthy individuals and CVD patients is different ( Figure 2 and Table 2)
.
After further adjusting for additional covariates, as the MVPA increases, the reduction in adverse consequences persists, but many estimates are no longer statistically significant, especially in healthy individuals
.
Repeating the analysis of these secondary results greatly strengthened the relationship between MVPA and event rates (S2 and S3 tables)
.
(S4 form)
4.
The dose-response relationship of total MVPA
Increasing the MVPA level reduced the risk for all groups (Figure 3)
.
For CVRF patients and healthy individuals, the shape of the dose-response relationship is curved, indicating that there is no additional health benefit above a certain dose of PA
.
This finding is in contrast with CVD patients, who exhibit a linear dose-response correlation, indicating that PA has no greatest impact on health
.
In the first part of the dose-response relationship (ie, at lower MVPA levels), the size and shape of the dose-response relationship of total MVPA and the primary outcome are significantly different between healthy individuals and CVD patients (P is the interaction: Spline 1 = 0.
004, Spline 2 = 0.
04, Spline 3 = 0.
08, Spline 4 = 0.
21)
.
Finally, it is also found that the education level of healthy individuals also has different dose-response correlations (P value for interaction: spline 1 = 0.
21, spline 2 = 0.
061, spline 3 = 0.
048)
.
Healthy individuals with low levels of education have a U-shaped dose-response relationship, and high MVPA levels lead to reduced health benefits (Figure S2)
.
Age and gender do not affect the dose-response correlation of MVPA
.
.
For CVRF patients and healthy individuals, the shape of the dose-response relationship is curved, indicating that there is no additional health benefit above a certain dose of PA
.
This finding is in contrast with CVD patients, who exhibit a linear dose-response correlation, indicating that PA has no greatest impact on health
.
In the first part of the dose-response relationship (ie, at lower MVPA levels), the size and shape of the dose-response relationship of total MVPA and the primary outcome are significantly different between healthy individuals and CVD patients (P is the interaction: Spline 1 = 0.
004, Spline 2 = 0.
04, Spline 3 = 0.
08, Spline 4 = 0.
21)
.
For CVRF patients and healthy individuals, the shape of the dose-response relationship is curved, indicating that there is no additional health benefit above a certain dose of PA
.
This finding is in contrast with CVD patients, who exhibit a linear dose-response correlation, indicating that PA has no greatest impact on health
.
In the first part of the dose-response relationship (ie, at lower MVPA levels), the size and shape of the dose-response relationship of total MVPA and the primary outcome are significantly different between healthy individuals and CVD patients (P is the interaction: Spline 1 = 0.
004, Spline 2 = 0.
04, Spline 3 = 0.
08, Spline 4 = 0.
21)
.
In the first part of the dose-response relationship (ie, at lower MVPA levels), the size and shape of the dose-response relationship of total MVPA and the primary outcome are significantly different between healthy individuals and CVD patients (PIs the interaction: spline 1 = 0.
004, spline 2 = 0.
04, spline 3 = 0.
08, spline 4 = 0.
21)
.
(P Finally, it is also found that the education level of healthy individuals also has different dose-response correlations (P value for interaction: spline 1 = 0.
21, spline 2 = 0.
061, spline 3 = 0.
048)
.
Education of healthy individuals There are also different dose-response correlations at different levels.
Healthy individuals with low education have a U-shaped dose-response relationship, and high MVPA levels lead to reduced health benefits (Figure S2)
.
Age and gender do not affect the dose-response correlation of MVPA
.
5.
The dose-response relationship of scene-specific MVPA
The dose-response relationship of scene-specific MVPA
The total amount of MVPA largely depends on recreational PA (Table 1)
.
Consistent with total MVPA, participation in leisure time MVPA is associated with a gradual decrease in adverse outcomes, and more leisure time MVPA is associated with a greater reduction in all-cause mortality and accident MACE in healthy individuals and CVRF patients (Figures 2 and 3, S5- S7 table)
.
However, in CVD patients, leisure time MVPA has nothing to do with all-cause mortality and MACE
.
The association between non- leisure time MVPA and poor results is not consistent (Figures 2 and 3, S8-S10 tables)
.
In healthy individuals, the non- leisure MVPA quartile risk estimate is < 1, but it does not reach statistical significance
.
Among CVRF patients, non- leisure MVPA was associated with a decrease in event rate
in Q1 (HR 0.
86 [95% CI 0.
77; 0.
97], P = 0.
02) and Q2 (HR 0.
84 [95% CI 0.
74; 0.
95], P = 0.
006) , But in 3 and Q4, there is no risk reduction .
Among CVD patients, compared with inactive individuals, only non- leisure MVPA Q2 (HR 0.
76 [95% CI 0.
62-0.
93], P = 0.
008) was associated with a lower event rate
.
Leisure or non- leisure timeThe results of MVPA, cardiovascular-related mortality and MACE are comparable
.
The all-cause mortality rate of leisure MVPA is relatively strong, and the all-cause mortality rate of non- leisure MVPA is relatively weak (S7 and S10 tables)
.
When the working time MVPA is separated from the non- leisure time MVPA, it is found that there is no correlation between the working time MVPA and the primary and secondary results (Figures 2 and 3, S11-S13 tables)
.
.
Consistent with total MVPA, participation in leisure time MVPA is associated with a gradual decrease in adverse outcomes, and more leisure time MVPA is associated with a greater reduction in all-cause mortality and accident MACE in healthy individuals and CVRF patients (Figures 2 and 3, S5- S7 table)
.
The total amount of MVPA largely depends on recreational PA (Table 1)
.
Consistent with total MVPA, participation in leisure time MVPA is associated with a gradual decrease in adverse outcomes, and more leisure time MVPA is associated with a greater reduction in all-cause mortality and accident MACE in healthy individuals and CVRF patients (Figures 2 and 3, S5- S7 table)
.
Consistent with total MVPA, participation in leisure time MVPA is associated with a gradual decrease in adverse outcomes, and more leisure time MVPA is associated with a greater reduction in all-cause mortality and accident MACE in healthy individuals and CVRF patients (Figures 2 and 3, S5- S7 table)
.
However, in CVD patients, leisure time MVPA has nothing to do with all-cause mortality and MACE
.
In CVD patients, the association between leisure time and non- leisure time MVPA and adverse outcomes is not consistent (Figures 2 and 3, S8-S10 tables)
.
Leisure time In healthy individuals, the non- leisure MVPA quartile risk estimate is < 1, but it does not reach statistical significance
.
Leisure < In CVRF patients, non- leisure MVPA is associated with the event in Q1 (HR 0.
86 [95% CI 0.
77; 0.
97], P = 0.
02) and Q2 (HR 0.
84 [95% CI 0.
74; Leisure 0.
95], P = 0.
006) Rate reduction is related, but in 3 and Q4, there is no risk reduction
.
Among CVD patients, compared with inactive individuals, only non- leisure MVPA Q2 (HR 0.
76 [95% CI 0.
62-0.
93], P = 0.
008) was associated with a lower event rate
.
Leisure leisure or leisure time MVPA, cardiovascular mortality and MACE comparable results
.
Leisure leisure time leisure MVPA strong all-cause mortality, non- spare MVPA weaker all-cause mortality (S7 and S10 table)
.
Leisure and leisure When separating the working time MVPA from the non- leisure time MVPA, it is found that there is no correlation between the working time MVPA and the primary and secondary results (Figures 2 and 3, S11-S13 tables)
.
free time
In general, in all groups, higher MVPA levels were associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular disease and death, but in healthy individuals and CVRF patients, the benefit stabilized when the amount of PA was high
.
Cardiovascular health affects the dose-response correlation between PA and MACE and all-cause mortality
.
Specifically, compared with healthy people and CVRF patients, the greater the amount of MVPA in CVD patients, the greater the health benefits
.
Healthy people and CVRF patients have a curvilinear relationship, while CVD patients have a linear relationship
.
In addition, we have also observed important differences in risk reduction in different scenarios of MVPA
.
Leisure time MVPA brings the most health benefits, non-leisure MVPA brings few health benefits, and working time MVPA has no health benefits
.
.
Cardiovascular health affects the dose-response correlation between PA and MACE and all-cause mortality
.
Specifically, compared with healthy people and CVRF patients, the greater the amount of MVPA in CVD patients, the greater the health benefits
.
Healthy people and CVRF patients have a curvilinear relationship, while CVD patients have a linear relationship
.
In addition, we have also observed important differences in risk reduction in different scenarios of MVPA
.
Leisure time MVPA brings the most health benefits, non-leisure MVPA brings few health benefits, and working time MVPA has no health benefits
.
Original source:
Esme´e A.
Bakker,et al.
Dose--response association between moderate to vigorous physical activity and incident morbidity and mortality for individuals with a different cardiovascular health status: A cohort study among 142,493
adults from the Netherlands.
PLOS Medicine | https:/ /doi.
org/10.
1371/journal.
pmed.
1003845 December 2, 2021
Leave a message here