13 defendants in 4 units for illegally dumping more than 2,000 tons of waste

Global Coatings Network News:

Global Coatings Network News:

Hazardous waste is corrosive, toxic, flammable and other hazardous properties.

Hazardous waste is corrosive, toxic, flammable and other hazardous properties.

Recently, the Second Court of Environmental Resources of the Yangtze River Basin of Rugao Court issued a first-instance judgment on a case involving 4 defendants and 13 defendants involving illegal disposal and dumping of hazardous waste to pollute the environment.

"This is the environmental pollution case with the largest number of units and people involved, the worst offense, and the most complete crackdown chain since the establishment of the Second Court of Environmental Resources for the Yangtze River Basin.

Lu Fei established Yisheng Environmental Service Company by the Xinjiang Haihe River.

From February to April 2018, Lu Fei and Chen Xi negotiated and instructed company worker Zhang Bing to dump a total of more than 500 tons of waste acid received from Weike Chemical Company and others into Xinjiang Haihe, leaving 2.

In addition, the road also were received from Lu Fei Qing, Sheng Hong, Yuan Kang at the waste solvents solvents , hazardous waste and other waste emulsion total of more than 1700 tons, Zhang Bing and ordered all workers poured into the Haihe River in Xinjiang.

During the trial, Lu Fei only recognized some of the crime facts, Shi Xin did not recognize the crime and the crime facts.

After the incident, the defendants Weike Chemical Company and Shangya Company respectively paid 1 million yuan and more than 300,000 yuan in compensation for ecological damage to the ecological environment department.

After the incident, the defendants Weike Chemical Company and Shangya Company respectively paid 1 million yuan and more than 300,000 yuan in compensation for ecological damage to the ecological environment department.

The Rugao Court held that the defendants Wei Ke Chemical Company, Kelai Chemical Company, and the defendants Chen Xi, Lu Qing, Sheng Hong, Yuan Kang, etc.
, knowing that others do not have a hazardous waste business license, still provided it to others or entrusted others to dispose of hazardous waste.
Waste; the defendant Yisheng Environmental Service Company and the defendants Lu Fei, Zhang Bing and others illegally dumped hazardous waste received from others in violation of national regulations; among them, the defendant Yisheng Environmental Service Company and the defendants Lu Fei, Zhang Bing, etc.
The defendant Wei Ke Chemical Company and the defendant Zhang Liang, the defendant Kelai Chemical Company and the defendants Chen Xi, Yuan Kang, and Shi Xin all had serious environmental pollution consequences; the remaining defendants and the defendants seriously polluted the environment.

The Rugao Court held that the defendants Wei Ke Chemical Company, Kelai Chemical Company, and the defendants Chen Xi, Lu Qing, Sheng Hong, Yuan Kang, etc.
, knowing that others do not have a hazardous waste business license, still provided it to others or entrusted others to dispose of hazardous waste.
Waste; the defendant Yisheng Environmental Service Company and the defendants Lu Fei, Zhang Bing and others illegally dumped hazardous waste received from others in violation of national regulations; among them, the defendant Yisheng Environmental Service Company and the defendants Lu Fei, Zhang Bing, etc.
The defendant Wei Ke Chemical Company and the defendant Zhang Liang, the defendant Kelai Chemical Company and the defendants Chen Xi, Yuan Kang, and Shi Xin all had serious environmental pollution consequences; the remaining defendants and the defendants seriously polluted the environment.

The actions of the defendants and the defendants constituted the crime of environmental pollution.
According to the status and role of each defendant unit and defendant in joint crimes, recidivism, surrender, confession, return of money, attempted crimes, voluntary confession and punishment, payment of ecological restoration fees, criminal delinquency, etc.
With lenient and discretionary punishments, the Rugao Court made the above judgment, in which Lu Fei was sentenced to a maximum of seven years for environmental pollution and a fine of 400,000 yuan.
At the same time, continue to pursue the illegal income of Lu Fei, Vike Chemical Company, Shangya Company and Yuan Kang totaling 1.
6118 million yuan.
(The defendant and the parties in the text are all aliases).

The actions of the defendants and the defendants constituted the crime of environmental pollution.
According to the status and role of each defendant unit and defendant in joint crimes, recidivism, surrender, confession, return of money, attempted crimes, voluntary confession and punishment, payment of ecological restoration fees, criminal delinquency, etc.
With lenient and discretionary punishments, the Rugao Court made the above judgment, in which Lu Fei was sentenced to a maximum of seven years for environmental pollution and a fine of 400,000 yuan.
At the same time, continue to pursue the illegal income of Lu Fei, Vike Chemical Company, Shangya Company and Yuan Kang totaling 1.
6118 million yuan.
(The defendant and the parties in the text are all aliases).

WeChat public account

WeChat public account

WeChat public account

WeChat public account