Why should wearable medical device data be used only as a reference?

Business Agency March 31 , smart medical equipment development is very fast, it is said that many projects have been invested, but intelligent medical equipment monitoring out of the data hospital and doctors do not admit that intelligent medical equipment if you really want to enter the people's homes, must be accepted by the traditional medical system, please ask guests, how long do you think this process needs to be achieved? When will smart medical devices really explode?special answer guest, inspired venture capital managing director Xue Jun:first, this problem appears very normal, there is nothing abnormalIn the past, the field of healthhealthwas strictly regulated by the government, this matter is the same all over the world, which countries are the same, the more developed countries are more stringent, in fact, China is still the least strict countryto some extent, Chinese bureaucracy is much better than America'sBecause medical care is a strict supervision of the industry, there are strict norms, any medical equipment, a testing method must pass the national testing and approval processin the past period of time, wearable smart devices and other products and services generated by Internet thinking, in a sense is not medical equipment, nor health services, but the common people do not understand this matter, if you gethospitalto see the doctor, the doctor can not use this thing to see the doctor, absolutely nottherefore, it can be said that this problem is not a problem, can also be said to be a problem, to solve this problem, the company of these products and services to understand whether you are providing medical services or general Internet-based servicesI'm giving a real case to a company in Silicon Valley that makes semiconductor sensors that can hold chips in mobile phonesThere are two contacts behind the phone, the user put his finger on that one, can measure the electrocardiogramDomestic manufacturers have introduced similar mobile phones, can measure the electrocardiogram, but this electrocardiogram can never be taken to the doctor, no doctor dare to take this electrocardiogram as a basis for diagnosis, as entertainment or their daily reminder is a reference valuehow does wearable smart medical devices compare to hospital devices? Some of the propaganda says that compared with hospital equipment is 90% accurate, I consulted the teacher of Qing School of Medicine, he said that the calculated figure is up to 50%, and this 50% is already a remarkable achievementif the accuracy rate is 90%, can it be consideredused as a medicalinstrument? Professionals tell us that wearable medical devices cannot still be defined as medical instruments, and that if they are defined as medical instruments, they must apply to the FDA for approvalSo, now can only talk to consumers that this is to play for you, reference on the line, really sick, but also have to see a doctorprofessionals say that the exact value of a point in a wearable medical device is meaningless and that long-term monitoring makes senseto give another example, after hitting the target, you will find that you did not hit the bull's-eye, but the shooting point is in the seven ring that place, indicating that you hit very accurate, may be the gun itself is not calibratedtherefore, the wearable medical devices available on the market today can be said to be accurate, but from a medical point of view is considered "biased"The industry has potential in the future, and in three or five years it will solve the problems of genuine integration into the health care system, including the possibility that the FDA might change its policy