-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
[ Focus on Chemical Machinery and Equipment Network ] Yesterday, * published an article titled "Science and technology are indispensable for a country with science and technology", which mentioned that "to make the general public realize that basic scientific research is equal to technological application.
" Important is a very difficult thing.
" And, from this perspective, it tells the author's understanding of a powerful country in science and technology.
Chemical machinery and equipment network hotspots pay attention to chemical machinery and equipment" Important is a very difficult thing.
" And, from this perspective, it tells the author's understanding of a powerful country in science and technology.
And one of the points in the article made me feel deeply: bid farewell to narrow cognition, based on a broader and forward-looking vision.
That's right, with the continuous growth of my country's technological strength, coupled with the rich experience accumulated in the production industry, now we also have our own technology, and have created many made in China that shocked the world.
But at the same time, there are also many companies that only care about short-term benefits.
Their products do not focus on the "connotation", but think about how to make consumers notice that they are "Made in China" in a short time, and they have "powerful" products.
"Strength", with "*" as the goal.
Killing chickens for eggs seems to have become their profit model.
That's right, with the continuous growth of my country's technological strength, coupled with the rich experience accumulated in the production industry, now we also have our own technology, and have created many made in China that shocked the world.
But at the same time, there are also many companies that only care about short-term benefits.
Their products do not focus on the "connotation", but think about how to make consumers notice that they are "Made in China" in a short time, and they have "powerful" products.
"Strength", with "*" as the goal.
Killing chickens for eggs seems to have become their profit model.
In fact, if only this is the case, it may be a conscious fall back for the company that does this, but for a country, it may be a heavy blow based on an industry.
Nowadays, with the continuous development of exchanges between various countries in tradeization, trade cooperation and product import and export have become very common.
Consumers also have more comparison samples and more choices for products.
At this time, if crude products are widespread in an industry, it is very likely that what consumers will leave behind is the lack of quality of a country’s products.
And, objectively speaking, as far as instrument companies are concerned, this phenomenon has already occurred, and the domestic acceptance of domestically-made instruments is an example.
Nowadays, with the continuous development of exchanges between various countries in tradeization, trade cooperation and product import and export have become very common.
Consumers also have more comparison samples and more choices for products.
At this time, if crude products are widespread in an industry, it is very likely that what consumers will leave behind is the lack of quality of a country’s products.
And, objectively speaking, as far as instrument companies are concerned, this phenomenon has already occurred, and the domestic acceptance of domestically-made instruments is an example.
So how should domestic instruments break through this pattern? Privately think it should be carried out from two aspects of market supervision and enterprise self-discipline.
There is no rule.
On the one hand, the market should more standardize the specifications of domestic instruments, including the product itself and product promotion, for example, a line for self-developed instruments.
Consumers can clearly understand which instruments are "new bottles and old wine" under the doctrine and which are "high-quality domestic products" that are truly self-developed.
For those companies that exaggerate their product promotion, or the quality of their instruments and follow-up services, certain restrictions, including export or bidding, should be imposed.
On the one hand, the market should more standardize the specifications of domestic instruments, including the product itself and product promotion, for example, a line for self-developed instruments.
Consumers can clearly understand which instruments are "new bottles and old wine" under the doctrine and which are "high-quality domestic products" that are truly self-developed.
For those companies that exaggerate their product promotion, or the quality of their instruments and follow-up services, certain restrictions, including export or bidding, should be imposed.
On the other hand, companies should pay more attention to the introduction of talents, and shift their focus from focusing on R&D on the visible and tangible technological achievements to a model that takes into account the common development of basic scientific research and technological applications.
And to reduce product innovation like squeezing toothpaste.
In addition, more attention should be paid to technology exchanges between enterprises rather than technology trading.
This is not easy.
For most companies, "technology" is almost the lifeblood of the company, but objectively speaking, using "private possession" as the secret of corporate development is indeed very detrimental to the development of the industry.
And to reduce product innovation like squeezing toothpaste.
In addition, more attention should be paid to technology exchanges between enterprises rather than technology trading.
This is not easy.
For most companies, "technology" is almost the lifeblood of the company, but objectively speaking, using "private possession" as the secret of corporate development is indeed very detrimental to the development of the industry.
In general, if domestic instruments want to break through the existing structure, they need to work together with market supervision to change the scientific research attitude of this domestic instrument market toward a positive direction.
Among them, what is needed is technical strength and hardware.
A common breakthrough in strength.
Among them, what is needed is technical strength and hardware.
A common breakthrough in strength.
Original title: Talking about how to break the pattern in the development of domestically produced instruments from a strong country
